Supervision of coaching environments can help frame ideas of critical pedagogy by reflecting on power dynamics and current discourse. Reflection acts as a technology of power that determines individual behavior and submission to ends of domination, creating objective subjects. The dominant language used to discuss reflection follows a Cartesian cognitive tradition dating to the 17th century, focusing on epistemic constructions from an epistemological and ontological perspective.
Supervision of coaching environments can help frame ideas of critical pedagogy by reflecting on power dynamics and current discourse. Reflection acts as a technology of power that determines individual behavior and submission to ends of domination, creating objective subjects. The dominant language used to discuss reflection follows a Cartesian cognitive tradition dating to the 17th century, focusing on epistemic constructions from an epistemological and ontological perspective.
Supervision of coaching environments can help frame ideas of critical pedagogy by reflecting on power dynamics and current discourse. Reflection acts as a technology of power that determines individual behavior and submission to ends of domination, creating objective subjects. The dominant language used to discuss reflection follows a Cartesian cognitive tradition dating to the 17th century, focusing on epistemic constructions from an epistemological and ontological perspective.
Supervision of coaching environments can help frame ideas of critical pedagogy by reflecting on power dynamics and current discourse. Reflection acts as a technology of power that determines individual behavior and submission to ends of domination, creating objective subjects. The dominant language used to discuss reflection follows a Cartesian cognitive tradition dating to the 17th century, focusing on epistemic constructions from an epistemological and ontological perspective.
MARCO NIM. 0602521009 Conceptualization of choice reflection
Supervision of the coaching environment can help in
framing the ideas of 'critical pedagogy' (Girox, 1989; Williams & Manley, 2014). Reflexion as a technology of power—supervision
The technology of power (disciplinary or political
technology) 'determines the behavior of individuals and submits them to certain ends or domination, an objectivity of the subject' Foucault (1988, 1988). Re-discourse part—object and subject
The language and discourse currently used for discussing, researching,
and writing about choice reflection is 'cognitive' in derivation and has an epistemic construction in the epistemological and ontological tradition of Cartesian rationality that has been followed since the seventeenth century (Fendler, 2003; Packer & Goicoecha, 2000). THANKS