Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bridge Health Monitoring System 4.29.11 Final Presentation
Bridge Health Monitoring System 4.29.11 Final Presentation
System
for
Bridges
COMPUTER ENGINEERING SENIOR PROJECT – Semester 2 , Spring 2011
Ralph Kliza
April 29, 2011
AGENDA
Background
Project Motive
Project Scope
Design Process
System Architecture and Components
Conclusion
Background:
I-35W Bridge Collapse,
August 1, 2007
Background:
NTSB Report Findings
Visual Inspections alone are inadequate
Inspections failed to give attention to gussets
Failure of tracking and documentation of
structural component conditions
Gusset plates not used in computer modeling
Improperly designed gusset plates
Background:
Texas Bridges
Over 50,000 bridges in Texas, July 2008
Steel Truss same as Minnesota: 6
1,871 bridges rated as “structurally
deficient”, July 2008
$330 million spent on replacing, widening,
rehabilitation and maintenance of Texas
bridges, August 2007 – August 2008.
Project Motive
Paradigm Shift in Civil Structures
Prevent Catastrophic Structural Failures
Adaptability to Other Civil Structures
Aid in Evaluation / Inspection of
Structurally Deficient Bridges
H.R. 3999 “Highway Bridge Reconstruction
and Inspection Act”, July 2008
Project Scope:
Hardware
- Strain Gauge Circuit
- Traffic Counter Circuit
- Rechargeable Power System
- Imote2 to PC Interface
Software
- GUI
- Database
- Data Analysis
- PC Interface
Design Process [4]
Requirements
Analysis
Specifications
System Architecture
Integration
And
Test
Requirements:
Requirements Gathering
I-35 W Bridge Collapse NTSB Report
International Society of Structural Health
Monitoring, www.ishmii.org
Academic Research / Papers
Senior Project Scope
Requirements:
User Requirements [2]
Quantify the overall integrity of the structure over a given period of time.
Detect changes in structure geometry after completion and over the life of
the structure, due to repetitive large live loads or dead loads or other
unusual loads.
computational core
data storage: 256 KB
program memory: 256 KB
processing capabilities engineering analyses
2. Portability
3. Reliability SIGNAL CONDITIONER
1. Wheatstone Bridge
2. In-Amp
IMOTE2 IMOTE2
- AD623 & AD8223 POWER INTFC
System Architecture:
AD8223 IN-AMP
System Architecture:
ADC, Computation & Wireless
- Imote2 Sensor Board (ITS400)
Analog-to-Digital Conversion (ITS400)
- Maxim MAX1363 12 bit / 4 Channel
System Architecture:
ADC, Computation & Wireless
- Imote2 Processor Radio Board (IPR2400)
Computational Core used for Data Analysis
- Intel Xscale Processor PXA271
- 13 – 416 MHz
Wireless Communication
- Wireless MMX Coprocessor TI CC2420
- 802.15.4 radio / 2.4 GHz
- 250 kb/s
System Architecture:
User Interface / Software
Data Management / Analysis
- Imote2 Builder Kit
Visual Studio 2005 - .NET & C#
Several Manufacturer Namespaces
- Serial Dump
- Data Base
QUESTIONS?
References:
1. Lynch, Jerome Peter, “An overview of wireless
structural health monitoring for civil structures”,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal A Society,
14 Dec 2006
2. “Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, August 1, 2007”, Accident Report NTSB
HAR-08/03 PB2008-916203.
3. “Imote2 Hardware Reference Manual”, Rev. A,
September 2007, Crossbow Technology, Inc..
4. Ford, Ralph M., Coulston, Chris S., “Design for
Electrical and Computer Engineers: Theory,
Concepts and Practice”, McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc., New York, NY, 2008.