Aline Alana Apresentação

Efficiency analysis of a
lead ingots production line
Aline Alana Oliveira Silva

Dataset
• The dataset in question shows the results of how many
ingots are considered approved taking in consideration
the cost, lead time and quantity of materials needed in
production of each alloy.
INPUTS OUTPUTS
TIPO DE LIGA CUSTO DE PRODUÇÃO ($100) INSUMOS (uni.) TEMPO DE PRODUÇÃO (horas) LINGOTES APROVADOS (uni.)
LIGA M 57 6 20 150
LIGA W 97 5 15 240
LIGA S 85 3 30 130
LIGA A 50 2 30 215
LIGA B 59 5 20 64
LIGA T 92 3 24 200
LIGA V 70 4 17 180
LIGA Z 75 6 23 200
LIGA H 74 3 27 164
LIGA J 39 4 16 210
LIGA Q 84 5 26 230
LIGA G 61 5 28 170
LIGA O 65 4 15 170
LIGA P 90 4 15 220
LIGA K 77 4 15 195
LIGA E 56 3 29 150
LIGA R 81 6 17 215
LIGA U 87 3 25 180
LIGA I 80 3 29 157
LIGA L 55 3 24 147
First Visualizations – Boxplot of inputs
PRODUCTION COST (x1) QUANTITY OF MATERIALS (x2) LEAD TIME (x3)

Min: $39 Min: 2 Min: 15
1º Qu.: $58,50 1º Qu.: 3 1º Qu.: 16,75
Median: $74,50 Median: 4 Median: 23,50
Mean: $71,50 Mean: 4 Mean: 22,25
3º Qu.: $84,25 3º Qu.: 5 3º Qu.: 27,25
Max: $97 Max: 6 Max: 30
First Visualizations – Boxplot of output
APPROVED INGOTS (y)

Min: 64
1º Qu.: 155,2
Median: 180
Mean: 179,3
3º Qu.: 211,2
Max: 240
First Visualizations – Boxplot
First Visualizations – Dispersion Plots
First Visualizations – Histograms
First Visualizations – Q-Q Plots
Efficiency Analysis
Data Envelopment Analysis

DEA – Return to Scale Test
As the p-value < 0.05, we can reject

the assumption that we have a
constant return to scale. Therefore,
the correct methods we should use is
the one for a variable return to scale.
DEA – Return to Scale Test
As the p-value < 0.05, we can reject

the assumption that we should use
the FDH method, because we have a
Variable Return to Scale
DEA – Efficiency Analysis
Efficiency Score
TYPE OF
LIGA M (1) LIGA W (2) LIGA S (3) LIGA A (4) LIGA B (5) LIGA T (6) LIGA V (7) LIGA Z (8) LIGA H (9) LIGA J (10)
ALLOY
Efficiency
0,78856153 1 0,85714286 1 0,79459281 0,96774194 0,95744681 0,67942521 0,90909091 1
Score
TYPE OF
LIGA Q (11) LIGA G (12) LIGA O (13) LIGA P (14) LIGA K (15) LIGA E (16) LIGA R (17) LIGA U (18) LIGA I (19) LIGA L (20)
ALLOY
Efficiency
0,92491166 0,69794382 1 1 1 0,87795993 0,89926332 0,94736842 0,87378641 0,97060008
Score
Benchmarking of Best Practices
TYPE OF
ALLOY
Benchmarking
10 2 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 10
of BP
Benchmarking
13 NA 14 NA 10 14 13 10 14 NA
of BP
Benchmarking
NA NA NA NA 13 NA 15 13 NA NA
of BP
TYPE OF
ALLOY
Benchmarking
2 4 13 14 15 4 2 4 4 4
of BP
Benchmarking
4 10 NA NA NA 10 10 14 14 10
of BP
Benchmarking
10 13 NA NA NA 13 13 NA NA 13
of BP
DEA –
Efficiency
Analysis
Variable Return to Scale
Weight of contribution of each input
TYPE OF
ALLOY
u1 0,0017331 0,0014611 0 0,00133179 0,00065941 0 0 0,00091444 0 0,00166983
u2 0,04506066 0,03284966 0,01904762 0,02140947 0,01714474 0,02150538 0,0212766 0,04049641 0,02020202 0,03754247
u3 0 0,0731056 0,14285714 0,14556323 0,12363996 0,16129032 0,15957447 0 0,15151515 0,08354926
TYPE OF
ALLOY
u1 0,0114841 0,00057921 0 0,00159393 0,00128601 0,0007286 0,00119925 0 0 0,00080548
u2 0 0,01505937 0,02222222 0,03583599 0,05889918 0,01894353 0,05310947 0,02105263 0,01941748 0,02094241
u3 0,00706714 0,10860122 0,16666667 0,07975157 0,00437243 0,13661202 0 0,15789474 0,14563107 0,15102698
Weight of contribution of the output
TYPE OF
ALLOY
v 0 0,00416667 0 0,00465116 0 0 0 0,00041803 0 0,0047619
TYPE OF
ALLOY
v 0,02243816 0 0 0,00454545 0,00066872 0 0,00054823 0 0 0
Slack of Reduction of inputs
TYPE OF
ALLOY
x1 0 0 11,4285714 0 0 20,9677419 0 0 2,72727273 0
x2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x3 0,73136915 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,00613978 0 0
TYPE OF
ALLOY
x1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,5789474 7,47572816 0
x2 8,43904594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,91699503 0 0 0
Slack of increase of the output
TYPE OF
ALLOY
y 50,8492201 0 86,4285714 0 134,171777 17,2580645 0,70035461 0 52,8181818 0
TYPE OF
ALLOY
y 0 40,0941211 0 0 0 59,3351548 0 37,1052632 59,5533981 52,8006444
Efficiency Analysis
Directional Distance Function

Directional of improvement
TYPE OF
ALLOY
x1 0 0 31,7647059 0 0 25,3529412 0 0 14,0588235 0
x2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y 39,3473193 0 85,2941176 0 122,421911 17,0588235 8,89705882 11,3348416 52,1764706 0
TYPE OF
ALLOY
x1 4,6 0 0 0 0 0,52941176 0 22,5882353 24,5294118 0
x2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x3 3,8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y 0 40,361991 0 0 0 65,5882353 0 36,7647059 58,5882353 51,4731935

Aline Alana Apresentação

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aline Alana Apresentação

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Efficiency analysis of a

lead ingots production line

Aline Alana Oliveira Silva

PRODUCTION COST (x1) QUANTITY OF MATERIALS (x2) LEAD TIME (x3)

APPROVED INGOTS (y)

Data Envelopment Analysis

As the p-value < 0.05, we can reject

As the p-value < 0.05, we can reject

Directional Distance Function

You might also like