Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shares
Shares
Shares
Stock
Valuation
Chapter Outline
• Common Stock
– Shareholder Voting
• Straight Voting
• Cumulative Voting
• Classes of Stock
– Shareholder Rights
• Annual Meeting
• Proxy
– Proxy Contest
• Preferred Stock
– Cumulative versus Non-Cumulative Preferred
Stock
– Preferred Stock: Equity or Debt?
• Market Order
• Limit Order
• Round Lot
• Super Display Book System
• Floor Broker
• Dealer
(Eq. 7.1)
(Eq. 7.2)
Problem:
• Suppose you expect Longs Drug Stores to pay an annual
dividend of $0.56 per share in the coming year and to trade
$45.50 per share at the end of the year. If investments with
equivalent risk to Longs’ stock have an expected return of
6.80%, what is the most you would pay today for Longs’
stock? What dividend yield and capital gain rate would you
expect at this price?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq. 7.1 to solve for the beginning price we would
pay now (P0) given our expectations about dividends
(Div1=$0.56) and future price (P1=$45.50) and the return we
need to expect to earn to be willing to invest (rE=0.068).
• We can then use Eq. 7.2 to calculate the dividend yield and
capital gain rate
Div1 P1
P0 (Eq. 7.1)
1 rE
Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-14
Example 7.1 Stock Prices and
Returns
Execute:
Div1 P1 $0.56 $45.50
P0 $43.13
1 rE 1.0680
• Referring to Eq. 7.2 we see that at this price, Longs’ dividend
yield is Div1/P0 = 0.56/43.13 = 1.30%. The expected capital
gain is $45.50 - $43.13 = $2.37 per share, for a capital gain
rate of 2.37/43.13 = 5.50%.
Evaluate:
• At a price of $43.13, Longs’ expected total return is 1.30% +
5.50% = 6.80%, which is equal to its equity cost of capital
(the return being paid by investments with equivalent risk to
Longs’). This amount is the most we would be willing to pay
for Longs’ stock. If we paid more, our expected return would
be less than 6.8% and we would rather invest elsewhere.
Problem:
• Suppose you expect Koch Industries to pay an annual
dividend of $2.31 per share in the coming year and to trade
$82.75 per share at the end of the year. If investments with
equivalent risk to Koch’s stock have an expected return of
8.9%, what is the most you would pay today for Koch’s stock?
What dividend yield and capital gain rate would you expect at
this price?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq. 7.1 to solve for the beginning price we would
pay now (P0) given our expectations about dividends
(Div1=$2.31) and future price (P1=$82.75) and the return we
need to expect to earn to be willing to invest (rE=0.089).
• We can then use Eq. 7.2 to calculate the dividend yield and
capital gain.
Div1 P1
P0 (Eq. 7.1)
1 rE
Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-18
Example 7.1a Stock Prices and
Returns
Execute:
Div1 P1 $2.31 $82.75
P0 $78.11
1 rE 1.089
• Referring to Eq. 7.2 we see that at this price, Koch’s dividend
yield is Div1/P0 = 2.31/78.11 = 2.96%. The expected capital
gain is $82.75 - $78.11 = $4.64 per share, for a capital gain
rate of 4.64/78.11 = 5.94%.
Evaluate:
• At a price of $78.11, Koch’s expected total return is 2.96% +
5.94% = 8.90%, which is equal to its equity cost of capital
(the return being paid by investments with equivalent risk to
Koch’s). This amount is the most we would be willing to pay
for Koch’s stock. If we paid more, our expected return would
be less than 8.9% and we would rather invest elsewhere.
Problem:
• Suppose you expect Harford Industries to pay an annual
dividend of $5.35 per share in the coming year and to trade
$63.32 per share at the end of the year. If investments with
equivalent risk to Harford’s stock have an expected return of
12.5%, what is the most you would pay today for Harford’s
stock? What dividend yield and capital gain rate would you
expect at this price?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq. 7.1 to solve for the beginning price we would
pay now (P0) given our expectations about dividends
(Div1=$5.35) and future price (P1=$63.32) and the return we
need to expect to earn to be willing to invest (rE=12.5%).
• We can then use Eq. 7.2 to calculate the dividend yield and
capital gain.
Div1 P1
P0 (Eq. 7.1)
1 rE
Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-22
Example 7.1b Stock Prices and
Returns
Execute:
Evaluate:
• At a price of $61.04 Harford’s expected total return is 8.76%
+ 3.74% = 12.50%, which is equal to its equity cost of capital
(the return being paid by investments with equivalent risk to
Harford’s). This amount is the most we would be willing to
pay for Harford’s stock. If we paid more, our expected return
would be less than 12.50% and we would rather invest
elsewhere.
• A Multiyear Investor
– Suppose we planned to hold the stock for two
years
• Then we would receive dividends in both year 1 and
year 2 before selling the stock, as shown in the
following timeline:
• A Multiyear Investor
– The formula for the stock price for a two-year
investor is the same as that for a sequence of
two one-year investments
Div1 Div2 P2
P0 (Eq. 7.3)
1 rE 1 rE
2
Div1
P0 (Eq. 7.6)
rE g
Problem:
• Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison), is a regulated utility
company that services the New York City area. Suppose Con
Edison plans to pay $2.30 per share in dividends in the
coming year. If its equity cost of capital is 7% and dividends
are expected to grow by 2% per year in the future, estimate
the value of Con Edison’s stock.
Solution:
Plan:
• Because the dividends are expected to grow perpetually at a
constant rate, we can use Eq. 7.6 to value Con Edison. The
next dividend (Div1) is expected to be $2.30, the growth rate
(g) is 2% and the equity cost of capital (rE) is 7%.
Execute:
Div1 $2.30
P0 $46.00
rE g 0.07 0.02
Evaluate:
• You would be willing to pay 20 times this year’s dividend of
$2.30 to own Con Edison stock because you are buying claim
to this year’s dividend and to an infinite growing series of
future dividends.
Problem:
• Suppose Target Corporation plans to pay $0.68 per share in
dividends in the coming year. If its equity cost of capital is
10% and dividends are expected to grow by 8.4% per year in
the future, estimate the value of Target’s stock.
Solution:
Plan:
• Because the dividends are expected to grow perpetually at a
constant rate, we can use Eq. 7.6 to value Target. The next
dividend (Div1) is expected to be $0.68, the growth rate (g) is
8.4% and the equity cost of capital (rE) is 10%.
Execute:
Div1 $0.68
P0 $42.50
rE g .10 .084
Evaluate:
• You would be willing to pay 62.5 times this year’s dividend of
$0.68 to own Target stock because you are buying claim to
this year’s dividend and to an infinite growing series of future
dividends.
Problem:
• Suppose The Walt Disney Company plans to pay $0.38 per
share in dividends in the coming year. If its equity cost of
capital is 10.6% and dividends are expected to grow by 9.5%
per year in the future, estimate the value of Disney’s stock.
Solution:
Plan:
• Because the dividends are expected to grow perpetually at a
constant rate, we can use Eq. 7.6 to value Disney. The next
dividend (Div1) is expected to be $0.38, the growth rate (g) is
9.5% and the equity cost of capital (rE) is 10.6%.
Execute:
Div1 $0.38
P0 $34.55
rE g .106 .095
Evaluate:
• You would be willing to pay 90.9 times this year’s dividend of
$0.38 to own Disney stock because you are buying claim to
this year’s dividend and to an infinite growing series of future
dividends.
(Eq. 7.8)
Change in Earnings
Earnings Growth Rate =
Earnings
Retention Rate Return on New Investment
(Eq. 7.11)
Problem:
• Crane Sporting Goods expects to have earnings per share of
$6 in the coming year. Rather than reinvest these earnings
and grow, the firm plans to pay out all of its earnings as a
dividend. With these expectations of no growth, Crane’s
current share price is $60.
Problem:
• Suppose Crane could cut its dividend payout rate to 75% for
the foreseeable future and use the retained earnings to open
new stores. The return on investment in these stores is
expected to be 12%. If we assume that the risk of these new
investments is the same as the risk of its existing
investments, then the firm’s equity cost of capital is
unchanged. What effect would this new policy have on
Crane’s stock price?
Solution:
Plan:
• To figure out the effect of this policy on Crane’s stock price,
we need to know several things. First, we need to compute
its equity cost of capital. Next we must determine Crane’s
dividend and growth rate under the new policy.
• Because we know that Crane currently has a growth rate of 0
(g = 0), a dividend of $6 and a price of $60, we can use Eq.
7.7 to estimate rE.
Plan:
• Next, the new dividend will simply be 75% of the old dividend
of $6. Finally, given a retention rate of 25% and a return on
new investment of 12%, we can use Eq. 7.12 to compute the
new growth rate (g). Finally, armed with the new dividend,
Crane’s equity cost of capital, and its new growth rate, we can
use Eq. 7.6 to compute the price of Crane’s shares if it
institutes the new policy.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 7.7 to estimate rE we have
Div1
$6
rE g 0% 0.10 0 10%
P0 $60
• In other words, to justify Crane’s stock price under its current
policy, the expected return of other stocks in the market with
equivalent risk must be 10%.
Execute:
• Next, we consider the consequences of the new policy. If
Crane reduces its dividend payout rate to 75%, then from Eq.
7.8 its dividend this coming year will fall to Div1 = EPS1 x
75% = $6 x 75% = $4.50.
• At the same time, because the firm will now retain 25% of its
earnings to invest in new stores, from Eq. 7.12 its growth rate
will increase to:
Execute:
• Assuming Crane can continue to grow at this rate, we can
compute its share price under the new policy using the
constant dividend growth model of Eq. 7.6
Div1 $4.50
P0 $64.29
rE g 0.10 0.03
Evaluate:
• Crane’s share price should rise from $60 to $64.29 if the
company cuts its dividend in order to increase its investment
and growth, implying that the investment has positive NPV.
By using its earnings to invest in projects that offer a rate of
return (12%) greater than its equity cost of capital (10%),
Crane has created value for its shareholders.
Problem:
• Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad (PW) expects to have
earnings per share of $0.48 in the coming year. Rather than
reinvest these earnings and grow, the firm plans to pay out all
of its earnings as a dividend. With these expectations of no
growth, PW’s current share price is $10.
Problem:
• Suppose PW could cut its dividend payout rate to 67% for the
foreseeable future and use the retained earnings to expand.
The return on investment in the expansion is expected to be
11%. If we assume that the risk of these new investments is
the same as the risk of its existing investments, then the
firm’s equity cost of capital is unchanged. What effect would
this new policy have on PW’s stock price?
Solution:
Plan:
• To figure out the effect of this policy on PW’s stock price, we
need to know several things. First, we need to compute its
equity cost of capital. Next we must determine PW’s dividend
and growth rate under the new policy.
• Because we know that PW currently has a growth rate of 0 (g
= 0), a dividend of $0.48 and a price of $10, we can use Eq.
7.7 to estimate rE.
Plan:
• Next, the new dividend will simply be 67% of the old dividend
of $0.48. Finally, given a retention rate of 33% and a return
on new investment of 11%, we can use Eq. 7.12 to compute
the new growth rate (g). Finally, armed with the new
dividend, PW’s equity cost of capital, and its new growth rate,
we can use Eq. 7.6 to compute the price of PW’s shares if it
institutes the new policy.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 7.7 to estimate rE we have
Div1 $0.48
rE g 0 4.8% 0% 4.8%
P0 $10
• In other words, to justify PW’s stock price under its current
policy, the expected return of other stocks in the market with
equivalent risk must be 4.8%.
Execute:
• Next, we consider the consequences of the new policy. If PW
reduces its dividend payout rate to 67%, then from Eq. 7.8 its
dividend this coming year will fall to Div1 = EPS1 x 67% =
$0.48 x 67% = $0.32.
• At the same time, because the firm will now retain 33% of its
earnings to invest in new stores, from Eq. 7.12 its growth rate
will increase to
Execute:
• Assuming PW can continue to grow at this rate, we can
compute its share price under the new policy using the
constant dividend growth model of Eq. 7.6
Div1 $0.32
P0 $27.35
rE g .048 .0363
Evaluate:
• PW’s share price should rise from $10 to $27.35 if the
company cuts its dividend in order to increase its investment
and growth, implying that the investment has positive NPV.
By using its earnings to invest in projects that offer a rate of
return (11%) greater than its equity cost of capital (4.8%),
PW has created value for its shareholders.
Problem:
• Lengefeld Manufacturing expects to have earnings per share
of $1.80 in the coming year. Rather than reinvest these
earnings and grow, the firm plans to pay out all of its
earnings as a dividend. With these expectations of no
growth, Lengefeld’s current share price is $24.
Problem:
• Suppose Lengefeld could cut its dividend payout rate to 50%
for the foreseeable future and use the retained earnings to
open an additional factory. The return on investment in the
new factory is expected to be 15%. If we assume that the
risk of the new factory is the same as the risk of its existing
factories, then the firm’s equity cost of capital is unchanged.
What effect would this new policy have on Lengefeld’s stock
price?
Solution:
Plan:
• To figure out the effect of this policy on Lengefeld’s stock
price, we need to know several things. First, we need to
compute its equity cost of capital. Next we must determine
Lengefeld’s dividend and growth rate under the new policy.
• Because we know that Lengefeld currently has a growth rate
of 0 (g = 0), a dividend of $2.00 and a price of $24, we can
use Eq. 7.7 to estimate rE.
Plan (cont'd):
• Next, the new dividend will simply be 50% of the old dividend
of $2.00. Finally, given a retention rate of 50% and a return
on new investment of 15%, we can use Eq. 7.12 to compute
the new growth rate (g). Finally, armed with the new
dividend, Lengefeld’s equity cost of capital, and its new
growth rate, we can use Eq. 7.6 to compute the price of
Lengefeld’s shares if it institutes the new policy.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 7.7 to estimate rE we have
Div1 $2.00
rE g 0% 0.0833 0 8.33%
P0 $24
• In other words, to justify Lengefeld’s stock price under its
current policy, the expected return of other stocks in the
market with equivalent risk must be 8.33%.
Execute:
• Next, we consider the consequences of the new policy. If
Lengefeld reduces its dividend payout rate to 50%, then from
Eq. 7.8 its dividend this coming year will fall to Div1 = EPS1 x
50% = $2.00 x 50% = $1.00.
• At the same time, because the firm will now retain 50% of its
earnings to invest in new stores, from Eq. 7.12 its growth rate
will increase to:
Execute:
• Assuming Lengefeld can continue to grow at this rate, we can
compute its share price under the new policy using the
constant dividend growth model of Eq. 7.6
Div1 $1.00
P0 $120.48
rE g 0.0833 0.075
Evaluate:
• Lengefeld’s share price should rise from $24 to $120.48 if the
company cuts its dividend in order to increase its investment
and growth, implying that the investment has positive NPV.
By using its earnings to invest in projects that offer a rate of
return (15%) greater than its equity cost of capital (8.33%),
Lengefeld has created value for its shareholders.
Problem:
• Suppose Crane Supporting Goods decides to cut its dividend
payout rate to 75% to invest in new stores, as in Example
7.3. But now suppose that the return on these new
investments is 8%, rather than 12%. Give its expected
earnings per share this year of $6 and its equity cost of
capital of 10% (we again assume that the risk of the new
investments is the same as its existing investments), what
will happen to Crane’s current share price in this case?
Solution:
Plan:
• We will follow the steps in Example 7.3, except that in this
case, we assume a return on new investments of 8% when
computing the new growth rate (g) instead of 12% as in
Example 7.3.
Execute:
• Just as in Example 7.3, Crane’s dividend will fall to $6 x 75%
= $4.50. Its growth rate under the new policy, given the
lower return on new investment, will now be g = 25% x 8% =
2%. The new share price is therefore
Div1
$4.50
P0 $56.25
rE g .10 .02
Evaluate:
• Even though Crane will grow under the new policy, the return
on its new investments is too low. The company’s share price
will fall if it cuts its dividend to make new investments with a
return of only 8%. By reinvesting its earnings at a rate (8%)
that is lower than its equity cost of capital (10%), Crane has
reduced shareholder value.
Problem:
• Suppose Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad decides to cut its
dividend payout rate to 67% to invest in new stores, as in
Example 7.3a. But now suppose that the return on these new
investments is 4%, rather than 11%. Give its expected
earnings per share this year of $0.48 and its equity cost of
capital of 4.8% (we again assume that the risk of the new
investments is the same as its existing investments), what
will happen to PW’s current share price in this case?
Solution:
Plan:
• We will follow the steps in Example 7.3a, except that in this
case, we assume a return on new investments of 4% when
computing the new growth rate (g) instead of 11% as in
Example 7.3a.
Execute:
• Just as in Example 7.3a, PW’s dividend will fall to $0.48 x
67% = $0.32. Its growth rate under the new policy, given
the lower return on new investment, will now be g = 33% x
4% = 1.32%. The new share price is therefore
Div1 $0.32
P0 $9.20
rE g .048 .0132
Evaluate:
• Even though PW will grow under the new policy, the return on
its new investments is too low. The company’s share price
will fall if it cuts its dividend to make new investments with a
return of only 4%. By reinvesting its earnings at a rate (4%)
that is lower than its equity cost of capital (4.8%), PW has
reduced shareholder value.
Problem:
• Suppose Lengefeld Manufacturing decides to cut its dividend
payout rate to 50% to invest in new stores, as in Example
7.3b. But now suppose that the return on these new
investments is 8%, rather than 15%. Give its expected
earnings per share this year of $2 and its equity cost of
capital of 8.33% (we again assume that the risk of the new
investments is the same as its existing investments), what
will happen to Lengefeld’s current share price in this case?
Solution:
Plan:
• We will follow the steps in Example 7.3b, except that in this
case, we assume a return on new investments of 8% when
computing the new growth rate (g) instead of 15% as in
Example 7.3b.
Execute:
• Just as in Example 7.3b, Lengefeld’s dividend will fall to $2 x
50% = $2.00. Its growth rate under the new policy, given
the lower return on new investment, will now be g = 50% x
8% = 4%. The new share price is therefore
Div1 $1.00
P0 $23.09
rE g .0833 .04
Evaluate:
• Even though Lengefeld will grow under the new policy, the
return on its new investments is too low. The company’s
share price will fall if it cuts its dividend to make new
investments with a return of only 8%. By reinvesting its
earnings at a rate (8%) that is lower than its equity cost of
capital (8.33%), Lengefeld has reduced shareholder value.
Div N 1
PN (Eq. 7.13)
rE g
Problem:
• Small Fry, Inc., has just invented a potato chip that looks and
tastes like a french fry. Given the phenomenal market
response to this product, Small Fry is reinvesting all of its
earnings to expand its operations. Earnings were $2 per
share this past year and are expected to grow at a rate of
20% per year until the end of year 4. At that point, other
companies are likely to bring out competing products.
Analysts project that at the end of year 4, Small Fry will cut
its investment and begin paying 60% of its earnings as
dividends. Its growth will also slow to a long-run rate of 4%.
If Small Fry’s equity cost of capital is 8%, what is the value of
a share today?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Small Fry’s projected earnings growth rate and
payout rate to forecast its future earnings and dividends.
After year 4, Small Fry’s dividends will grow at a constant 4%,
so we can use the constant dividend growth model (Eq. 7.13)
to value all dividends after that point. Finally, we can pull
everything together with the dividend-discount model (Eq.
7.4).
Execute:
• The following spreadsheet projects Small Fry’s earnings and
dividends:
Execute:
• Starting from $2.00 in year 0, EPS grows by 20% per year
until year 4, after which growth slows to 4%. Small Fry’s
dividend payout rate is zero until year 4, when competition
reduces its investment opportunities and its payout rate rises
to 60%. Multiplying EPS by the dividend payout ratio, we
project Small Fry’s future dividends in line 4.
Execute:
• After year 4, Small Fry’s dividends will grow at the constant
expected long-run rate of 4% per year. Thus we can use the
constant dividend growth model to project Small Fry’s share
price at the end of year 3. Given its equity cost of capital of
8%,
Div4 $2.49
P3 $62.25
rE g 0.08 0.04
Execute:
• We then apply the dividend discount model (Eq. 7.4) with this
terminal value:
Evaluate:
• The dividend-discount model is flexible enough to handle any
forecasted pattern of dividends. Here the dividends were zero
for several years and then settled into a constant growth rate,
allowing us to use the constant growth rate model as a
shortcut.
Problem:
• Small Fry, Inc., has just invented a potato chip that looks and
tastes like a french fry. Given the phenomenal market
response to this product, Small Fry is reinvesting all of its
earnings to expand its operations. Earnings were $5 per
share this past year and are expected to grow at a rate of
30% per year until the end of year 3. At that point, other
companies are likely to bring out competing products.
Analysts project that at the end of year 3, Small Fry will cut
its investment and begin paying 75% of its earnings as
dividends. Its growth will also slow to a long-run rate of 5%.
If Small Fry’s equity cost of capital is 9%, what is the value of
a share today?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Small Fry’s projected earnings growth rate and
payout rate to forecast its future earnings and dividends.
After year 3, Small Fry’s dividends will grow at a constant 5%,
so we can use the constant dividend growth model (Eq. 7.13)
to value all dividends after that point. Finally, we can pull
everything together with the dividend-discount model (Eq.
7.4).
Execute:
• The following spreadsheet projects Small Fry’s earnings and
dividends:
Execute:
• Starting from $5.00 in year 0, EPS grows by 30% per year
until year 3, after which growth slows to 5%. Small Fry’s
dividend payout rate is zero until year 3, when competition
reduces its investment opportunities and its payout rate rises
to 75%. Multiplying EPS by the dividend payout ratio, we
project Small Fry’s future dividends in line 7.
Execute:
• From year 3 onward, Small Fry’s dividends will grow at the
expected long-run rate of 5% per year. Thus we can use the
constant dividend growth model to project Small Fry’s share
price at the end of year 3. Given its equity cost of capital of
9%,
Div3 $8.24
P2 $206.00
rE g .09 .05
Execute:
• We then apply the dividend discount model (Eq. 7.4) with this
terminal value:
Evaluate:
• The dividend-discount model is flexible enough to handle any
forecasted pattern of dividends. Here the dividends were zero
for several years and then settled into a constant growth rate,
allowing us to use the constant growth rate model as a
shortcut.
• Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks
– Many companies do not pay dividends, thus the
dividend-discount model must be modified
• Share Repurchases
– The firm uses excess cash to buy back its own
stock
• Two Consequences:
1. The more cash the firm uses to repurchase shares, the
less cash it has available to pay dividends
2. By repurchasing shares, the firm decreases its share
count, which increases its earnings and dividends on a
per-share basis
• Share Repurchases
– In the dividend-discount model, a share is valued
from the perspective of a single shareholder,
discounting the dividends the shareholder will
receive:
$1.48 billion
PV (Future Total Dividends and Repurchases) $52.86 billion
.12 - .092
$52.86 billion
P0 $75.73 per share
698 million shares