Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Application of Concepts

Session 7
Sanket Sunand Dash
Problem Statement for InterfaceRAISE
• Problem statement: Increase impact of InterfaceRAISE by generating
new revenue sources, convincing CEO to increase funding and
changing organizational structure
SCQA for InterfaceRAISE
• Situation: InterfaceRAISE is operating in the sustainability consulting
market that is growing at 34 percent annually and is expected to grow
from $377 million in 2009 to $2 billion in 2015.
• Complication: InterfaceRAISE’s organizational structure is preventing it
from taking advantage of growth in market
• Question: How should InterfaceRAISE increase its impact while
dealing with organizational constraints?
• Answer: InterfaceRAISE should target above-average industry growth
by leveraging its consultant network and revamping its organizational
structure.
Increase the number of projects

Ensure SMEs are compensated


for their service

Use external SMEs more


Generate new revenue sources
extensively

Construct an
issue tree Tie-up with other consutants

regarding the
dilemma in the Hartzfeld spends more time in
marketing InterfaceRAISE
case.
Appraise of the need for high
growth

Increasing Impact given Convince CEO to increase


reluctance to increase funding funding

Show alignment with


organizational vision

Contemplate ways to structure


investment as loans for which
InterfaceRAISE is legally liable

Hire separate COO-level post for


InterfaceRAISE

Divide InterfaceRAISE into


Strengthen organizational
departments with full-time
structure
practice leaders

Develop an internal pool of full-


time SMEs
MINTO Pyramid for InterfaceRAISE

Target above-average
industry growth by leveraging
its consultant network and
revamping its organizational
structure
Why?

Can provide the full gamut of Loans from parent company


Overall market is growing at Current org. structure inhibits
services in sustainability Can leverage network effects can finance InterfaceRAISE
34% YoY InterfaceRAISE growth
consulting growth
How? How?
How?
Why?
Brand name of Interface Gaps are mostly in Projects requiring deep and External and internal Current structure does not
Interface employees possess Consulting exhibit network No dedicated resource for InterfaceRAISE can legally
enables InterfaceRAISE to tap communication-related broad competencies major coordination is done by same support functional
a diverse set of competencies effect business development incur liabilities
external consultants competencies revenue source person specialization

External communication Tapping external consultants Rapid growth in industry


Current Interface employees Most revenue comes from
experts can be integrated InterfaceRAISE is a pioneer and Interface employees suggests high probability of
are not incentivized enough few customers
easily requires different skills payback

Increasing competition will


Compensate for their efforts Leveraging network effect In line with Interface
hinder growth in coming
at market value requires new clients philosophy
years

5
Thank You

Course Name || Indian Institute of Management Rohtak 6

You might also like