This document discusses the history of sound technologies from early recording devices to modern synthesizers. It covers several key points:
1) Early recording and broadcasting relied on analogue/mechanical technologies, with electricity later enabling widespread radio. This allowed for some editing but was limited.
2) Institutional studios like those at radio stations facilitated experiments with musique concrète and tape editing but access was restricted.
3) Personal devices like records and tape machines democratized music creation as the technologies became cheaper, enabling new creative techniques.
This document discusses the history of sound technologies from early recording devices to modern synthesizers. It covers several key points:
1) Early recording and broadcasting relied on analogue/mechanical technologies, with electricity later enabling widespread radio. This allowed for some editing but was limited.
2) Institutional studios like those at radio stations facilitated experiments with musique concrète and tape editing but access was restricted.
3) Personal devices like records and tape machines democratized music creation as the technologies became cheaper, enabling new creative techniques.
This document discusses the history of sound technologies from early recording devices to modern synthesizers. It covers several key points:
1) Early recording and broadcasting relied on analogue/mechanical technologies, with electricity later enabling widespread radio. This allowed for some editing but was limited.
2) Institutional studios like those at radio stations facilitated experiments with musique concrète and tape editing but access was restricted.
3) Personal devices like records and tape machines democratized music creation as the technologies became cheaper, enabling new creative techniques.
Electricity and Sound First sound technologies analogue/mechanical, electricity involved later Lots of important devices eventually created to exploit electrical circuitry Alongside the intended uses (often to do with dissemination), devices also open up new possibilities for creating music Two dimensions for the discussion today: Recording and/or playback devices vs synthesised sound Institutional vs private contexts Overarching story of increasing accessibility follows on from previous classes (e.g. Class 2 – Acoustic Instruments) But diversity of users might not make it into the standard story Early Recording and Broadcasting Phonograph invented late 19th-century (became known as a Gramophone after the company) Recording onto cylinders with various media (wax, later foil) Electric motors incorporated in 1910s and 20s, making them easier to use and more reliable Electricity also makes widespread radio broadcasting possible, takes off in 1920s (via telephone-based precursors) Focus at this stage primarily on recording and playback alone, no editing Large-scale cuts or reordering possible, but technical capacity for more involved changes is limited Significant developments in editing of recordings emerge in 1930s and 40s Institutional Contexts (1) Devices that emerge for editing recordings initially very expensive/bulky, so difficult for musicians to own themselves Radio and television and companies most likely to own it anyway since equipment is useful for editing broadcasts, but could also be used creatively Experiments with studio devices lead to idea of ‘musique concrète’ in mid- 1940s/early 1950s, essentially collages of live sounds Composers start residencies in broadcasting ‘studios’ e.g. Pierre Schaeffer at Radiodiffusion nationale, or Daphne Oram at BBC Key factor: not everyone gets access to these studios, only those invited by the people in charge or those who successfully apply for entry Overall result is that only approved work produced, difficult for outsiders to make careers through these channels Personal Devices (1) For as long as recording/playback devices have existed, versions are eventually created for personal use Discs take over from cylinders, made of shellac until WW2 shortage, leading to re-investigation of material that became known as vinyl Magnetic tape invented in 1928 in Germany, kept secret until a device was captured by the Allies towards end of WW2 Developed in America post-War alongside records: tape masters often used to create vinyl discs New techniques become possible: looping, reversing, splicing etc., All of these options become available to individuals once devices are cheap enough Creativity with Devices Lots of creative ways to use recording and playback devices in themselves Important component of ‘experimental music’, e.g. challenging what counts as a valid instrument John Cage wrote several pieces for radios, e.g. Imaginary Landscape No.4 Idiosyncrasies of tape players led to Steve Reich’s interest in ‘phasing’ via Come Out (1966) Tape doesn’t have to go through a machine, e.g. Laurie Anderson’s Tape-Bow Violin Creativity with Devices Lots of creative ways to use recording and playback devices in themselves Important component of ‘experimental music’, e.g. challenging what counts as a valid instrument John Cage wrote several pieces for radios, e.g. Imaginary Landscape No.4 Idiosyncrasies of tape players led to Steve Reich’s interest in ‘phasing’ via Come Out (1966) Tape doesn’t have to go through a machine, e.g. Laurie Anderson’s Tape-Bow Violin In principle any device that makes a sound could count as well Actively draws attention to technology as the point of the piece in itself, rather than being ‘just’ the medium through which it happens Recording and Obsolescence History of recording and broadcasting normally described as ‘progression’ through different devices and storage media, each one an improvement But you could also write this history as a sequence of things falling out of use DAB overtaking traditional LW/FM radio, might eventually make Cage’s pieces for radios unperformable Old storage media can no longer be used as device manufacture stops Emerging concept of ‘digital rot’ refers to loss of information over time as systems change – could include songs/pieces of music Vinyl has made a resurgence, perhaps because (unlike others) it retains flexibility for live manipulation Break Reminders Registration for next term’s modules closes at midnight tonight, sign up today if you want to do another subject Submit your proposed Essay/Podcast/Vlog topic via Google Form by 6pm on Wednesday 15th December Reflective Diary should be submitted via Blackboard, due by 4pm on 20th December Main Assessment should be submitted via Blackboard, due by 4pm on 7th January Synthesised Sound Creation of sound from purely technical source rather than an acoustic source Various different methods of achieving this, technically Early instruments might use capacitors (Theremin, 1920), or vacuum tubes and radio oscillators (Ondes Martenot, 1928) Later instruments based on increasingly digital production methods Deep transformation of music recognised almost immediately Possibility to create any sound, beyond human or acoustic limitations, stimulates huge amount of creative activity Though took time for reality to catch up with ideas Institutional Contexts (2) Initially part of the (West) German institutional/corporate context Same techniques as tape (looping, reversing, splicing), but now new options, including filtering and reverb Still very exclusive, e.g. Karlheinz Stockhausen controlling access to studios in Köln (Cologne) Pieces are not necessarily exclusively synthesised, e.g. acoustic sounds blended into Gesang der Jünglinge (1956) Work with synthesised sound in radio and television studios naturally filters through to broadcast products Especially common for sci-fi (and fantasy), e.g. theremins for ‘ghost’ noises Forbidden Planet score by Bebe and Louis Barron (1956) an important early example, though via a non-institutional route Influence on Acoustic Sound Possibilities for synthesised sounds start to feed back into how people treat acoustic instruments Spectralist music a very literal example: pieces for acoustic instruments based on spectrograms of sound, e.g. Gérard Grisey Partiels (1975) Unusual sounds/gestures for instruments in avant-garde or experimental music might have origins in artificial sonic effects Hyper-detailed notation for some music relies on idea that such accuracy increasingly is achievable, even if only electronically Superhuman demands on performers have to be met as best as possible, pieces might not come across as precisely as intended Personal Devices (2) Some of the most important developments in synthesised sound for 1960s and 70s happen outside institutional contexts e.g. Robert Moog experimenting with new devices over 1960s (started out with Theremin kits) Moog Synthesisers gave total control over sounds coming out of a keyboard Later models (e.g. Minimoog) were among first truly portable synthesisers Taken up by a range of classical composers, e.g. Ruth White, but also becomes associated with popular music very quickly Once anyone can create sounds, no longer limited to avant-garde elite Avant-garde circles start to use the word ‘research’ to describe their musical activities, retains prestige even as pop usage gets equally sophisticated Technology and Performance Music created using these technologies raise new questions about how it should be performed If the piece still requires a live performance, what does this look like? How does the performer behave? If a piece only exists only in recorded form, where is it presented? How is it premiered? Which one a creator prefers can tell you a lot about their approach to music Those who want control over all aspects of how a piece sounds will prefer recordings, creating a ‘perfect’ version that will never change Those who are interested in chance or spontaneity will produce music that requires live performers and events Technology and Diversity Electronic and digital technologies take off during era of feminism and civil rights, makes for greater diversity in history Women take advantage of limited stereotypes for theremin, becoming main champions of new instrument, e.g. Clara Rockmore or Lucie Bigelow Rosen Global phenomenon, depending on resources: Halim El-Dabh and musique concrète in 1940s Cairo, or Toshiro Mayuzumi in NHK Studio from 1954 Trans history too, e.g. Wendy (née Walter) Carlos, another Moog pioneer Nonetheless, standard history is already overwhelmingly white and male Influential composers quickly forgotten if institutions don’t care to remember E.g. lack of interest in Bebe Barron separately from her husband Institutional/Private Crossover Corporate vs private distinction has started breaking down over last few decades Laptops and sound software for individual users very big business, ditto online streaming platforms for listeners Musicians increasingly expected to know how to use these products, taking hours to learn Pieces once made over days/weeks using extremely specialised equipment could now be created in minutes, and broadcast almost immediately on YouTube Responses vary: some push for ‘real’ acoustic sound or ‘traditional’ instruments Others turn to hardware hacking, making DIY electronic sound devices rather than corporate products, ‘just like they did back in the 50s and 60s’ Widespread digital training means tech won’t be going away any time soon Next Week: The Future of Music Field trip, meet at the Front Desk of the Royal College of Music for a 4pm start, allowing time to sign in. Guest Lecturer: Dr George Waddell, from the RCM’s Centre for Performance Science Come prepared to give a 30-second ‘elevator pitch’ for a music-related technology, ignoring any practical limitations. It could be viable in 5, 10, 20, or 50 years. What do you want to see? (No slides or props please!)