MESYUARAT PENYELARASAN

INISIATIF DAN PROGRAM

BAHASA INGGERIS ANJURAN
ELTC 2017
 Highly Immersive Programme (HIP) 2016

A Glance into the Impact of HIP in 2016

HIGHLY IMMERSIVE PROGRAMME

The MBMMBI Umbrella

Programme under Wave 2 The Highly Immersive

of MEB
Highly Immersive
Programme is a programme
Programme
under the MBMMBI policy.
HIP supports the 5 Shifts of
THE 5 SHIFTS OF THE MEB
the Malaysia Education
Blueprint (MEB) and
reinforces the 1999 Circular

Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 Shift 5 Shift 9

 HIGHLY IMMERSIVE PROGRAMME

HIP Implementation (2016-2018)

Year No. of Schools Targeted Achievement

2016 94 schools (Phase 1) Target achieved: 100% (1200

1106 schools (Phase 2) schools)

2017 5500 schools

2018 10,000 schools

 3 Monitoring visits were conducted throughout 2016

Methodology

OBJECTIVES
i. Investigate the effectiveness of HIP
implementation in schools.

i. Observe the impact of HIP on student

outcomes.

ii. Ascertain the implementation of the

Whole School Approach.
SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL

Phase 1: 6 states (94 schools) Phase 2: 10 states (1106 schools

 TEACHER AND STUDENT QUESTIONNAIRES

i. The effectiveness of HIP was measured in the From Students’ Perspective

4 thematic areas as below.
Development of Highly-immersive Environment
Students’ (3.17) mean scores were highest in this domain. This is an
indication that students are responding positively towards the
development of a highly-immersive environment which is supportive of
students’ learning.

Development of Whole-School Approach

Students’ questionnaires produced the lowest means scores in this area.
(2.60). Item analysis showed that students gave low scores to parental
involvement, community engagement and alumni in HIP activities. More
effort is needed to engage with the wider community so that the ‘Whole-
School Approach’ can become a reality.

Student Learning Outcomes

The students questionnaire generated average scores of (2.69). This
implies that the HIP implementation which is aimed at improving students’
learning outcomes is still an on-going process.

Student Behaviour change

Students scores (2.83) are above average indicative of the fact that
students are beginning to experience positive change in their behaviours
towards English language in their schools.
Student Questionnaire Item Analysis

 Mean
Themes Items Description of Items
Score
There are a lot of materials and
Part A Item 1 3.27
resources around the school.
Materials and resources help
  Item 5 3.41 promote my English language
proficiency.
School encourages parental
Part B Item 10 2.43
involvement.
School encourages alumni
  Item 11 2.28
involvement.
School encourages community
  Item 12 2.57
involvement.
Part C Item 16 2.44 I speak English with my friends.

  Item 18 2.24 I speak English with my parents.

Part D Item 29 3.58 I like to learn English.

  Item 31 2.32 I organise activities in my school.

I am responsible for my own
  Item 36 3.25
learning.
 Way Forward
Share best practices among schools during the HIP colloquium.

School Heads spearhead and support the development of HIP

immersive environment in school.
SUCCESS
Teachers interact in English with students.

School Heads engage actively with the Parent-Teachers’

Association in English language school activities.

Pupils take charge of their own language development by

engaging in English language activities.

District and State department officers play a critical role in

providing support and monitoring to ensure the school
community is committed to the implementation of HIP.
 HIGHLY IMMERSIVE PROGRAMME 2016

HIP Pledge
• The success of HIP rests on the commitment and support from
all stakeholders within the education fraternity.

• Let’s do this for our students!

HIGHLY IMMERSIVE
PROGRAMME
2017 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
HIGHLY IMMERSIVE PROGRAMME

CONTENT

i. 2017 – Number of schools involved and school list template

ii. HIP Implementation - Approach
iii. HIP implementation process
iv. HIP planner 2017
v. Data collection
vi. Online reporting template
vii. Survey questionnaire
 HIP EXPANSION
No. of schools in 2016 No. of schools in 2017
States Primary Secondary Total States Primary Secondary Total
Perlis 74 28 102
Perak 94 28 122 Perlis 0 2 2
Negeri Perak 286 104 390
103 44 147
Sembilan Negeri Sembilan 83 81 164
Pahang 82 41 123
Pahang 206 98 304
Sabah 149 63 212 Sabah 384 156 540
Sarawak 271 49 320 Sarawak 423 140 563
Pulau Pinang 10 10 20
Pulau Pinang 124 65 189
Kedah 10 10 20
Selangor 10 10 20 Kedah 237 126 363
Melaka 10 10 20 Selangor 259 178 437
Johor 10 10 20 Melaka 99 458 147
Kelantan 10 10 20 Johor 296 193 489
Terengganu 10 10 20 Kelantan 167 119 286
Kuala Terengganu 152 87 239
10 10 20
Lumpur Kuala Lumpur 93 56 149
Putrajaya 10 10 20 Putrajaya 4 1 5
Labuan 10 10 20 Labuan 7 0 7
  873 353 1226    2820 1454   4274
 HIP IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH
Concept of
‘HANDHOLDING FORMAL ORIENTATION
i) Existing PPDs to create ii) New PPDs
clustering of schools
HIP PLANNER 2017
 Data collection 2017

Sample Data Collection Template

Contact No. Mobile No. of the
State PPD No. Name of School (School) Code Name of School Head School Head
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               

i) Data on Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan

ii) Data on Sekolah Kebangsaan
iii) Data SJK (Cina)
iv) Data SJK (Tamil)
v) Data SKPK
vi) Data SA/SMA
 Online reporting template
1st entry – April 2017
2nd entry – October 2017

KPI: Peratus sekolah HIP yang menunjukkan peningkatan  tahap immersive BI.

(sekurang-kurangnya tahap 2)

TOTAL MEAN LEVEL OF

      MEAN SCORES SCORE /320 IMMERSION
NAMA OF NAME OF TOTAL STUD. SCHOOL TEACHERS STUDENTS PARENTS
STATE SCHOOL ENROLMENT HEAD

NAME OF  
PPD SCHOOL A        
   SCHOOL B          
   SCHOOL C          
             
Data management
• The online reporting template is sent by schools to the following address using
the format below.

RUMUSAN DATA ONLINE DI PERINGKAT PPD    

TOTAL LEVEL OF NO OF
MEAN IMMERSI NO OF STUDENT NO OF SUCCESS CHALLENG
      MEAN SCORES SCORE VENESS STUDENTS % S % STUDENTS % STORIES ES
NAMA NO OF TOTAL SCHOOL TEACHERS STUDENTS PARENTS   OUT OF   EXTRA OUTREACH
PPD SCHOOLS STUD HEAD CLASS CLASS
ENROL  
MENT        
PPD  
KERA
MAT                              
                                 
                                 
                                 
Online reporting template
In-Class

Total no. of students

Activity(s) Objective(s)
involved %

       

       

Out-of-Class

Total no. of students

Activity(s) Objective(s)
involved %

       

       
 Online Reporting Template
Extra Classes
Total no. of students
Activity(s) Objective(s)
involved %

       

       

Outreach
Total no. of students
Activities Objectives
involved %

       

       
• Link for Survey Monkey
•  
•  
• Teachers : https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HIPTFQ1
• Student (English) : https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HIPstud
• Student (BM) : https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HIPlawatan
•