Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Site Investigation Geophysic Test
Site Investigation Geophysic Test
geophysic test
11/01/22
1
Geophysics
1. Resistivity
2. Seismic Refraction
3. Seismic Reflection
4. Gravity
5. elektromagnetic
11/01/22
2
Geophysical exploration
The technique of determining underground
materials by:
measuring some physical property of the
material and,
through correlations, using the obtained
values for identification.
Determination over a sizeable distance
(compare: boring/test pit: “point” checking).
The measurements can be rapidly obtained.
11/01/22
3
The methods have proven to be
reliable but,
there are limitations as to the data can
be obtained,
a number of borings are required to
obtained test samples to make
accurate determinations of soil
properties,
it is the boring that can provide the
detail required.
Geophysical and boring data are
complementary one to another.
11/01/22
4
1. Resistivity survey
11/01/22
5
Resistivity
11/01/22
6
Resistivity
Uses:
11/01/22
7
Resistivity Sounding
11/01/22
8
Resistivity Sounding
11/01/22
9
Field Work - Procedure
Schematic illustration
basic concept of
electric resistivity
measurement.
11/01/22
10
Methodology
11/01/22
11
Methodology
11/01/22
12
Methodology
Field Work - Equipments
11/01/22
13
Methodology
Field Work - Procedure
C1 P1 P2 C2
C1 and C2 = Current electrode
a a a
P1 and P2 = Potential electrode
a = Electrode spacing
11/01/22
14
Methodology
Field Work - Procedure
Cable
Switching
system
11/01/22
15
Methodology
Field Work - Procedure
11/01/22
18
Methodology
Data collection – RES2DINV
11/01/22
19
Cont’d
Advantages:
11/01/22
20
Cont’d
Disadvantages:
Igneus& Metamorf m 1
Granite 5x103 –106 10-6-2x10-4
Basalt 103-106 10-6-10-3
Slate 6x102-4x107 2.5x10-8-1.7x10-3
Marble 102-2.5x108 4x10-9-10-2
Quarzite 102-2x108 5x10-9-10-2
Sedimentary Rock
Sandstone 8-4x103 2.5x10-4-0.125
Shale 20-2x103 5x10-4-0.05
Limestone 50-4x102 2.5x10-3-0.02
1-100 0.01-1
Soil and Water
Clay
Alluvium 10-800 1.25x10-3-0.1
Groundwater (Clean) 10-100 0.01-0.1
Marine water 0.15 6.7
11/01/22
22
Application of resistivity survey to
determine weathering profiles
11/01/22
23
Application of resistivity survey to
determine weathering profiles
11/01/22
24
Application of resistivity survey to determine sinkholes or cavity of limestone
11/01/22
25
Application of resistivity survey to
determine water boundaries
11/01/22
26
Study Area
Kg.Tanjung Laboh; Johor
Small Airport
Location map
Actual location
11/01/22
27
Study Area
11/01/22
28
Geology Map Study Area
11/01/22
29
Geology Of Tanjung Laboh Batu Pahat; Johor
11/01/22
30
well located nearby the coastal area (10m).
500m from the study area.
11/01/22
31
RESULT ANALYSIS
11/01/22
32
RESULT ANALYSIS
Y1 Y1
Y2Y2 Fresh water
Water table zone ??
Brackish
Saline intrusion Y3 zone
Y3
11/01/22
33
Result Analysis
11/01/22
34
Results Based on Inverse Model
11/01/22
35
Results Based on Inverse Model
Salinity:
The salinity appeared
to have intruded
inland as indicated by
the concave curve
Y1-Y2-Y3 whose
ordinates, like above,
are respectively:
(25m, 90m), (30m,
150m), and (55m,
200m).
11/01/22
36
Results Based on Inverse Model
11/01/22
37
Results Based on Inverse Model
Fresh water:
No fresh water zone was
detected by the survey line
which was limited in capability
only up to 50m depth and the
survey distance of 1 Km from
the shore. The freshwater
zone might be detected had
the survey capability been
extended in depth and
distance. About 2 Km inland,
some activities of aquaculture
ponds were observed using
tube wells and dug-well water
supply for individual domestic
use.
11/01/22
38
Results Based on Inverse Model
Aquifer:
No aquifer thickness
could be estimated within
the limits of the study
(60m depth and distance
1 Km), indicating that an
aquifer might be present
to depths exceeding 60m
and distance exceeding 1
Km from the shore due to
the fact that the
impermeable layer
(bedrock or clay layer)
was not detectable.
11/01/22
39
2. Seismic Refraction
Seismic refraction measurements are made by measuring the travel time of
a refracted seismic wave as it travels from the surface through one layer to
another and is refracted back to the surface where it is picked up by
geophones.
The wave speed relating to the density and bonding characteristics of the
material.
The travel time of a seismic wave is a function of soil and rock density and
hardness.
11/01/22
40
Seismic refraction wave movement into
subsurface
11/01/22
41
Seismic Refraction Concept
11/01/22
43
Borehole
11/01/22
44
Seismic refraction
11/01/22
45
Field survey:
Obtaining a series of geophone reading at different distance
along a straight line directed from the impact point;
for geophone spacing close to the strike plate the
vibration picked up by geophone will be from those direct
through the upper layer,
the time to reach the geophone is proportional to the
distance from the point of impact.
When the surficial layer is underlain by harder layer, the
waves also progress downward and enter the harder layer.
The velocity will be greater in the harder material.
Waves traveling through the upper portion of the harder
layer transfer energy back into the upper layer refracted
wave.
For large strike-geophone distances, the refracted wave will
reach the geophone more quickly than directed wave, even
though the path of travel is longer.
11/01/22
46
Velocity, v, of P waves in a medium
E = modulus of elasticity of
E (1 )
v the medium
(1 2 )(1 ) unit wt of the medium
g = acceleration due to
g gravity
m = Poisson’s ratio
11/01/22
47
Procedure………
x
A v1 (x1) B (x2) C (x3) D
Velocity v2 c
Layer II b
Ti1
v3
Velocity v3 Layer III a xc Distance, x
11/01/22
48
Procedure ………
11/01/22
49
P-wave velocity in various soils & rock
11/01/22
50
Example: The result of are fraction survey are given in
the following table. Determine P-wave velocities and
thickness of the material encountered (BM Das pp 138)
Distance from the Time of first arrival
point of impact (m) (sec x 103)
2.5 11.2
5 23.3
7.5 33.5
10 42.4
15 50.9
20 57.2
25 64.4
30 68.6
35 71.1
40 75.5
11/01/22
51
80
x 1 0-3 sec b c
65
11/01/22
52
Thickness of layers:
xc = 10.5 m Z1 1 v2 v1 xc
2 v2 v1
Thus:
1 814.8 228
Z1 10.5 3.94 m
2 814.8 228
11/01/22
53
Cont’d
Uses:
Advantages:
11/01/22
55
Cont’d
Disadvantages:
11/01/22
57
Determination of subsurface profile
using seismic refraction method
11/01/22
58
Determination of subsurface profile
using seismic refraction method
11/01/22
59
Determination of subsurface profile using seismic refraction method
11/01/22
60
Determination of subsurface profile
using seismic refraction method
11/01/22
61
Determination of subsurface profile and geological structure
using seismic refraction method
11/01/22
62
Rotary Wash Boring Method
11/01/22
63
A Sample Seismogram
11/01/22
64
Table 1: Typical velocities of earth materials
11/01/22
65
Table 2: Typical velocities of earth materials by geologic age
11/01/22
66
11/01/22
67
Rotary Wash Boring
Distance (m)
BH1 20 BH2
0
Ground Water Table
10
Clay
15
Depth (m)
20
25
Sand
Silt
30
Clay
35
11/01/22
68
Seismic Refraction
Distance(m)
BH1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 BH2
0
Loose Soil
Ground Water Table
10
Original Soil
Residual Soil
20
Depth(m)
30
40
Rock
50
Distance(m)
BH1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 BH2
0
Ground Water Table
10
20
Pinnacle
Depth(m)
30
Lensa Sand
Hard Clay
Cliff
Cavity
40
Limestone
50
11/01/22
70
3. Seismic Reflection
The seismic reflection technique measures
the travel time of seismic waves from the
ground surface downward to a geologic
contact where part of the seismic energy is
reflected back to geophones at the surface
while the rest of the energy continues to the
next interface.
11/01/22
71
Schematic diagram of seismic reflection
11/01/22
72
Cont’d
Uses:
11/01/22
73
Cont’d
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
11/01/22
75
4. Gravity
11/01/22
76
Sketch of gravity survey over cavity
11/01/22
77
Gravity survey
11/01/22
78
Cont’d
Uses:
Advantages:
11/01/22
80
Cont’d
Disadvantages: