This document discusses techniques for evaluating pavements, including non-destructive and destructive tests. Non-destructive tests mentioned include falling weight deflectometer (FWD), Benkelman beam rebound deflection, plate load test, and wave propagation methods. FWD applies an impulsive load to measure deflection of the pavement surface. Destructive tests involve obtaining core samples in test pits for laboratory analysis, but are more expensive and disruptive than non-destructive methods.
This document discusses techniques for evaluating pavements, including non-destructive and destructive tests. Non-destructive tests mentioned include falling weight deflectometer (FWD), Benkelman beam rebound deflection, plate load test, and wave propagation methods. FWD applies an impulsive load to measure deflection of the pavement surface. Destructive tests involve obtaining core samples in test pits for laboratory analysis, but are more expensive and disruptive than non-destructive methods.
This document discusses techniques for evaluating pavements, including non-destructive and destructive tests. Non-destructive tests mentioned include falling weight deflectometer (FWD), Benkelman beam rebound deflection, plate load test, and wave propagation methods. FWD applies an impulsive load to measure deflection of the pavement surface. Destructive tests involve obtaining core samples in test pits for laboratory analysis, but are more expensive and disruptive than non-destructive methods.
This document discusses techniques for evaluating pavements, including non-destructive and destructive tests. Non-destructive tests mentioned include falling weight deflectometer (FWD), Benkelman beam rebound deflection, plate load test, and wave propagation methods. FWD applies an impulsive load to measure deflection of the pavement surface. Destructive tests involve obtaining core samples in test pits for laboratory analysis, but are more expensive and disruptive than non-destructive methods.
BENKELMAN BEAM REBOUND DEFLECTION PLATE LOAD TEST WAVE PROPAGATION TESTS FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER ( FWD) In falling weight deflectometer (FWD) test an impulsive load is applied It corresponds to the effect of loading due to standard axle on in-service pavement. The instantaneous deflections of the road surface is measured at a number of points at different distances radially outward from the centre of the falling weight. Thus, the shape of deflection bowl is obtained. Data used to calculate the stiffness related parameters of pavement structure. The elastic moduli of individual layers in a multi- layer system can be calculated based on surface deflections Helpful in Overlay design Back calulation to find E value PLATE LOAD TEST WAVE PROPAGATION METHODS
Ground Penetration Radars
Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) Ultra Sonic Surface Wave (USW) Methods Used to determine pavement thickness as well as to determine linear elastic modulus of pavement layers These methods operate by measuring surface seismic waves generated by an impulsive source Advantages: This is a test method that can take the place of lab testing of cores or cylinders. Test can be made within hours of construction. Limitations: These measurement systems must occupy a particular location to be tested and remain stationary during the measurement process, with set and measurement time proportional to the number of receivers used. Therefore, road and bridge closures would be necessary for surveying existing pavements. DESTRUCTIVE TESTS
Traditional test method to determine physical
pavement properties Tests are conducted in test pits, samples are obtained from core borings, and laboratory tests are conducted on the samples These tests have the advantage of examining actual in-service materials Disadvantages Destructive tests are expensive, particularly considering the amount of testing necessary for a network-level survey Most properties determined by destructive testing change very little between surveys Destructive testing can also have a significant impact on traffic.