This document discusses two types of niche HTSFs (High Technology Small Firms): niche producers and new product-based firms. Niche producers focus on small, specialized markets that are not attractive for large firms. New product-based HTSFs develop novel technologies with potential for mass markets. While this offers strong growth, it also brings risks of competitors copying the technology. Some new product firms pursue a "grow to sell" strategy where they plan to be acquired once reaching a predicted stage. However, the reality is strategies often change based on evolving market conditions.
This document discusses two types of niche HTSFs (High Technology Small Firms): niche producers and new product-based firms. Niche producers focus on small, specialized markets that are not attractive for large firms. New product-based HTSFs develop novel technologies with potential for mass markets. While this offers strong growth, it also brings risks of competitors copying the technology. Some new product firms pursue a "grow to sell" strategy where they plan to be acquired once reaching a predicted stage. However, the reality is strategies often change based on evolving market conditions.
This document discusses two types of niche HTSFs (High Technology Small Firms): niche producers and new product-based firms. Niche producers focus on small, specialized markets that are not attractive for large firms. New product-based HTSFs develop novel technologies with potential for mass markets. While this offers strong growth, it also brings risks of competitors copying the technology. Some new product firms pursue a "grow to sell" strategy where they plan to be acquired once reaching a predicted stage. However, the reality is strategies often change based on evolving market conditions.
HTSF BY: GROUP 3 Niche Producer HTSFs Niche producer HTSFs • Niche production is another type of HTSF activity that is, again, less. glamorous than many large-scale HTSF activities. • This niche type of production has many advantages, not least of which is an absence of the problems experienced by HTSF executives who seek to exploit a new product that has high mass-market potential. •A major problem for any new HTSF seeking to exploit a novel product technology with mass-market potential is, ironically • Strong growth potential is also a problem, since the road from invention to exploitation for such a firm is paved with many potential pitfalls, mainly associated with protecting the intellectual property involved. • • The very high potential that the new technology possesses will ensure that large international firms will seek to gain access to this new knowledge. • • 'Reverse engineering' its new product to produce an (often improved) patent-infringing copy. • There are a number of high technology markets where the scope for mass production does not exist. - Because the size of the total market is small (e.g. specialist measuring instruments; laboratory equipment; specialist high- performance electronic components) - Or because the type of products produced are bespoke in that the specification for the product will vary with each individual customer (c.g. control equipment for industrial production systems or small power stations). • Small and Medium Firms - Small and medium-sized firms in these types of activities can achieve profitability that offers a good return for the management and workers of an HTSF, such returns would not be great enough to interest. - A much larger firm. Thus, due to the lack of a threat from larger firms in high- technology sectors and the relatively small size of the market predatory activity by large firms in this sub-sector is rare. The new Product-based HTSF The new product-based HTSF • The third type of firm, based on a new product with high or very high growth potential is the kind of HTSF most commonly recognized by the public as archetypal. • Not all HTFS grow from garage- based business to multinational enterprises • Example of a successful HTFs is Microsoft which started in a garage in new Mexico by bill gates and his friends • Many Firms produced a new product with strong growth potential for opt for “grow to sell” approach to their business strategy and in these cases the problems of survival and growth are reduced by an acceptance at the outset that the firm will be sold at a predicted point in the business plan. • However in practice the reality is that whatever strategy the firms adopts in birth it may be modified to suit changing conditions in the firm develops the product that was its raison d'etre . • For example a firm that was founded on a “grow to sell” basis might not be sold on the predetermined time remaining independent thought buying out its investors while a firm that was founded on strongly independent principles if it is cause by its reluctance to disturb lucrative mainframe market this new firm was able to exploit a window of opportunity that was open for six year between 1972 to 1978 , and launch its new desktop computer before IBM realize that the mainframe computer market was under threat by the time IBM recognized the threat It was too late and Apple Computer Inc. Was way on becoming number one. Thank you for Listening Credits to slidego.com and the owner for the template