Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BM Unit 1.7 Organizational Planning Tools
BM Unit 1.7 Organizational Planning Tools
Planning Tools
Unit 1.7 HL
Organizational Objectives
• Serve to guide a business and give it a
sense of direction
• To Motivate
• objectives can help inspire managers and employees to reach a
common goal
• To Direct
• objectives provide an agreed and clear focus for all individuals and
departments of an organization
Organizational Planning Tools
• Tools that will help businesses plan in
order to achieve their organizational
objectives:
• Fishbone diagram
• Decision tree
• Force field analysis
• Gantt chart
Fishbone diagram
• Also known as an Ishikawa or cause-and-effect diagram,
is a diagram that attempts to identify the causes of an
event.
• It gets its name from the fact that the diagram resembles
the skeleton of a fish.
• The diagram was created by Kaoru Ishikawa, who
pioneered quality management processes in the
Kawasaki shipyards, and became one of the founding
fathers of Japanese modern management.
• Fishbone analysis provides a structured way to help think
through all possible causes of a problem.
Fishbone diagram using the 4Ms to identify
different categories of the causes:
Unsuitable management Unskilled workers, a lack of
style and miscommunication training and insufficient
with the workforce personnel
Demotivated or
unproductive
employees
Technological failures, Sub-standard (poor
faulty equipment and quality) materials
the use of outdated and delayed
machinery deliveries
• Methods – are the bottles used clean?
• Machines – are there rusty pipes in the
production machines?
• Manpower – is it skilled enough?
• Materials – are the raw materials to blame?
• Measurement – is the calibration incorrect?
• ‘Mother nature’ (the environment) – is the
working environment contaminated?
Another example:
STEPS IN BRIEF
1.Agree on a problem statement (effect). Write it at the
center right of the flipchart or whiteboard. Draw a box
around it and draw a horizontal arrow running to it.
• Disadvantages:
• Tends to be simplistic for some real world problems
• Must use with other decision making frameworks to
establish the root cause(s) of a problem
When not to use it:
•
The problem is simple or is already known.
• The team size is too small for brainstorming.
• There is a communication problem among the team members.
• There is a time constraint; all or sufficient headcount is not
available for brainstorming.
• The team has experts who can fix any problem without much
difficulty.
Exam Tip!
Many students claim that certain
decisions should not be pursued due
to the risk involved, yet there is an
element of risk associated with
almost every business decision. It is
the role of the skilled managers to
ensure that decision-making carries
as much quantifiable, rather than
unquantifiable, risk as possible.
Create your own
Fishbone Diagram
Decision Trees
Decision Trees
Context
Outcomes/Chance
Nodes Probability/ Chance
Profit or Loss
Decision
Success
Point $15 Million
0.2
B
Failure
A 0.8
-$2 Million
Success
$7 Million
0.4
=$3m - $1.6m
=$ 1.4m
A friend has given you a sum of money for your 18th birthday. Which you
want to invest in shares. A local independent financial advisor suggest
that you ought to consider three companies:
A
Failure 0.5
- $ 800
Success 0.3
$ 3,000
A B
Failure 0.7
- $ 500
Success 0.8
$ 1,200
C
Failure 0.2
- $ 900
A: (.5)(2,000) - (.5)(800) = 1,000 - 400 = $ 600
B: (.3)(3,000) - (.7)(500) = 900 - 350 = $ 550
C: (.8)(1,200) - (.2)(900) = 960 - 180 = $ 780
Mini Case
A business is deciding whether or not to launch a new product. It could
do some market research, costing $12,000 which would mean the
chance of a successful launch would be estimated at 70%. Without
market research the chance of a successful launch would be only 50%.
A successful launch would earn profit of $ 60,000 for the business, but
if it failed, only $20,000 would be earned.
$60,000
Success 0.7
Launch
Do not launch
$0
Success 0.5
$60,000
Launch without research
Success 0.5
$20,000
Expected Values
Node 1:( 60,000*0.7) + (20,000*0.3) =$48,000 - $12,000 = $36,000
Node 2: (60,000*0.5) + (20,000*0.5) = $40,000
Question? Which option do you recommend? Justify your answer.
Problems of using decision trees
It is purely quantitative technique, which is designed to allow for
probability and pay-off. There is no allowance for external issues which
may be relevant to the decision being made.
The forecast pay-offs are assumed to be correct, which may not be the
case in reality. If both probability and forecast pay-offs are incorrect
then the decision becomes as good as the information which is issued.
There are no in-between value for probability, that is, the pay-off can
be one of three options – successful, moderate, poor. All the
probabilities must add up to one, but in reality there is a wider range of
answers, each with an associated probability.
Conclusion
Given the problems and assumptions, what is the
point of using decision trees in the first place?
15-34
34
Lewin’s Force Field Analysis Model
Restraining forces
• Resistance to change -- employee Driving
behaviors that block the change process Forces
Steps:
1. Identify a specific
Change
2. Identify forces for and
againsty change
3. Prioritise the forces
4. Develop Strategies to
overcome opposing
and reinforce
supporting forces
15-36
What is a Gantt chart?
A Gantt Chart is a graphic display of
schedule-related information.
15-37
Example of a Gantt Chart
Framework
Task Bars
Dependancy links
Milestones
15-38
Structure of a Gantt Chart
15-39
Benefits of Gantt Charts
15-40
Exam Tip!
You may be required to construct a
Gantt chart from given information in
the exams. This tool can be very
challenging for a lot of students, so
the only way to improve is by
practicing your techniques. Even if
your Gantt chart is slightly wrong,
marks are awarded for correctly
interpreting and explaining the
diagram.
Gantt charts will be used for the Action
Plan in the IA research proposal.
Review Pages 104-105
Question 1.7.3 & 1.7.4
Read the CUEGIS
Key Terms
Decision Trees
• Are a quantitative organizational
planning tool that calculates the
probable values of different options,
helping managers to minimize the
risks in decision-making.
Force Field Analysis
• With the forces for and against
change. Driving forces are the
benefits of change (such as reduced
costs or improved productivity) while
restraining forces are the causes of
resistance to change.
Fishbone diagram (or
cause and effect model)
• Is an organizational planning tool
based on identifying and dealing with
the root causes of a problem or issue
facing a business.
Gantt Charts
• Are a visual representation of all the
tasks in a particular project plotted
against the timescale. As a planning
and scheduling tool, it allows project
managers to monitor progress.
Organizational Planning
Tools
• Are the various methods that
businesses use to aid their decision-
making, e.g. decision trees, fishbone
diagrams, Gantt chars and force field
analysis.