The document discusses a presentation made by Arup+GHD as consultants for Manila Water about a proposed step-feed sewerage system for Antipolo. It outlines the step-feed configuration and process, describes existing step-feed plants in Melbourne, Australia and Kungsängen, Sweden, and notes advantages of the step-feed process such as lower carbon usage and operational flexibility.
The document discusses a presentation made by Arup+GHD as consultants for Manila Water about a proposed step-feed sewerage system for Antipolo. It outlines the step-feed configuration and process, describes existing step-feed plants in Melbourne, Australia and Kungsängen, Sweden, and notes advantages of the step-feed process such as lower carbon usage and operational flexibility.
The document discusses a presentation made by Arup+GHD as consultants for Manila Water about a proposed step-feed sewerage system for Antipolo. It outlines the step-feed configuration and process, describes existing step-feed plants in Melbourne, Australia and Kungsängen, Sweden, and notes advantages of the step-feed process such as lower carbon usage and operational flexibility.
The document discusses a presentation made by Arup+GHD as consultants for Manila Water about a proposed step-feed sewerage system for Antipolo. It outlines the step-feed configuration and process, describes existing step-feed plants in Melbourne, Australia and Kungsängen, Sweden, and notes advantages of the step-feed process such as lower carbon usage and operational flexibility.
Existing Step-feed Plant Melbourne Water – Eastern Treatment Plant
MANILA WATER FRAMEWORK FOR CONSULTANCY SERVICES
STP Treatment Design – STEP FEED PROCESS STEP FEED REACTOR
MANILA WATER FRAMEWORK FOR CONSULTANCY SERVICES
STEP FEED PROCESS ADVANTAGES
Lower consumption of External Carbon Source
Operational flexibility Having a higher MLSS compared to the conventional Shock loading will not be a problem since the flow is introduced along different points.