Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Personal and Professional Attributes and Interpersonal Effectiveness
Personal and Professional Attributes and Interpersonal Effectiveness
EFFECTIVENESS
Answer : B
Q: Which of the following are not considered rights of a Public School Teacher?
Answer: C
Answer : C
Q: The father of Krisel Mallari already a c c e p t the f act that her daughter was not
the Class Valedictorian. During the interview with the m e d i a it shows that her
Answer : C
Sec. 8. Rights of Parents. — In addit ion t o other rights under existing laws, all
parents w h o h a v e children enrolled in a school h a v e t he following rights:
Q: Mr. Swabe is a regular client of MTMAS for the past 15 years. He always p a y
his dues on time until on e d a y Mr. Swabe work a b r o a d as migrant worker.
Because of negligenc e he forgot to p a y his remaining dues amounting to 75,000
Pesos. His four (4) c o- mak er s were d e d u c t e d p a y m e n t from their salaries
causing t hem to file c om p la in to MTMAS.
Is the basis of the lending c o m p a n y to d e d u c t amortization to its co-worker
valid?
Answer: B
Legal basis :
Form No. OP-004, Revised 092013 APPLICATION FOR LOAN MTMAS
Answer: B
Q: What are the five k e y reform thrust of the BESRA p olicy action?
A: The BESRA policy actions are organized under Five Key Reform Thrusts:
Answer :
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NINE POSITIVE QUALITIES OF BESRA:
Q: What is NCBTS?
Answer: D
Teachers give t he learners opportunity t o experience failure a n d success.
2. Universal
repetitionschool
in first participat ion aAll
three grades. n d children
elimination a g eof
d drop-outs a n d school
six should enter
r ea d y t o learn a n d p r e p a r e d t o a c h i e v e t h e required c om p et e n ci es for
Grades 1 t o 3.
3. Universal c omple t i on of t h e full c y c l e of basic e d u c a t i o n schooling with
satisfactory a c h i e v e m e n t levels b y all a t every g r a d e or year.
4. Total c om munit y c o m m i t m e n t t o a t t ai n me n t of basic e d u c a t i o n
c ompet enc ies for all: Every co m mu n it y should mobilize all its social,
political, cultural a n d e c o n o m i c resources a n d capabilities t o support
t he universal at t a in m en t of basic e d u c a t i o n c om p et e n ci es in Filipino
a n d English.
3. Social
a c h i e vcapital. Education
e m e n t of for all
certain ends t hbuilds
at wo usocial
l d notcapital. It makes
otherwise b e a t tpossible
a in a b le the
in absence.
4. Cultural practices. Cultural values c a n b e a highly pr od uc t ive c o m p o n e n t
of social capital, allowing communities a n d t h e wh ole country t o
efficiently restrain opportunism a n d resolve problems of collective a c t i o n
such as individual refusal t o serve t h e public g o o d , et c.
5. Individual f reedom. Education for all is really a b o u t assuring t h e c a p a c i t y
t o fully exercise f r e e d o m b y all.
I. General Introduction
5. Along
eight twithi m e b―Education for All‖, t targets
o u n d a n d specific he Philippines
under is also
t he c o m m i t t eDeclaration
Millennium d t o pursue
which it signed o n September 2000. The Declaration, in general, aims t o
r e d u c e poverty b y half in 2015 (22.65 p e r c e n t proportion of t he
populat ion b e l o w poverty in c id en ce a n d 12.15 p e r c e n t b e l o w
subsistence incide n c e b y 2015). With t h e a d o p t i o n of t h e Declaration, t he
Philippines likewise affirmed its c o m m i t m e n t t o t h e Millennium
Dev elopm ent Goals (MDG) g e a r e d towards r ed uc in g poverty, hunger,
diseases, illiteracy, environmental d e g r a d a t i o n a n d discrimination against
w om e n . These goals h a v e b e e n mainst reamed in t he country’s M e d i u m
Term Philippine De v e lo pm e nt Plan (MTPDP) 2004-2010 including policies
a n d plans related t o children, access t o primary e d u c a t i o n a n d g e n d e r
1. In 1990, there was a World Declaration o n Education for All (EFA) in
Jomtiem, Thailand, which prescribed t h a t Basic Learning Needs shall b e
m e t for all b y various means. As a response, t he Philippines c r a f t e d a n d
i mp l em en t ed t he 10-year EFA Philippine Plan of Act ion covering 1991-
2000.
14. Though t he gover nme n t officially a p p r o v e d t h e Philippine EFA 2015 Plan only
in 2006, it was alr eady used b y t h e DepEd as its overall planning a n d policy
framework as early as 2003 a n d was alr ea d y in t eg ra t e d in t h e formulation a n d
u p d a t i n g of t he MTPDP 2001-04 a n d 2005-2010. Instead of six t a rg et dimensions
as a d v a n c e d b y g lo b a l EFA, t he Philippines g r o u p e d t h e m into four
component objectives w h e n it considered t h e local situation, all g e a r e d
towards t he overall g o a l of providing basic c o mp e t e n c ie s t o everyone t o
a c h i e v e functional literacy b y 2015. This will b e d o n e through four c o m p o n e n t
objectives (as
against t he six of global EFA), namely:
of 2015
The following are eligible t o t a k e t he test
1. O n e year as H e a d Teacher
2.2 years as Master Teacher or Teacher in C h a r g e
3. Five Years as T-III
Current Issues/Topics:
1. Senior High School
2. School Based
M a n a g e m e n t 3. DepEd
Rationalization Plan 4. RPMS