Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formulation and Characterization of Local Materials For Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) Enhanced Oil Recovery
Formulation and Characterization of Local Materials For Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) Enhanced Oil Recovery
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Introduction
Oil Recovery Mechanisms
Primary Recovery
Tertiary Recovery
Surfactant Solutions
CO2
Polymers Steam or Hot Water
Inert Gas
Alkali Flue gas Insitu Combustion
Miscible Solvent
Polymer/Alkali
Alkali/Surfactant/Polymer Figure 1: Oil recovery process
Foams Other:
Infill Drilling PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Statement of Problem
Bypassed oil (residual oil saturation more than one-half OOIIP) after
conventional water flooding,
SLIDE 4
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Aim
SLIDE 5
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Objectives
• To identify some potential local materials, formulate Alkaline, Surfactants, and
polymers slurries and characterize them for ASP flooding.
1
• To carry out laboratory flooding experiments on a core sample from the Niger
2 Delta region with the prepared solutions
SLIDE 6
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
SCOPE OF STUDY
SLIDE 7
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
RESEARCH GAP
From literatures, several researchers have developed bio-ASP formulation with materials
such as okra, ogbono, achi, waterleaves, akawun etc. However, these materials constitute
as food and therefore its industrial utilization would cause more havoc than good.
Also, biomaterials used by researchers previously were not characterized to ascertain the
presence of active ASP agents as selection was based on physical behaviour of the
materials and intuition.
SLIDE 8
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology – Materials
Dump site of Irvingia Dump site of discarded palm husk Dump site of discarded plantain stalk
Gabonensis mesocarp
SLIDE 9
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology – Materials
SLIDE 10
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology – Materials & Equipment
Materials Equipment
B
D
EOR setup
Core sample
Powder from samples AAS full setup SLIDE 11
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
The Core Flooding
Setup
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology – Experimental Workflow
SLIDE 14
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology – Modelling of Experimental Outcome
SLIDE 15
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology Cont’d - Particle Swarm Optimization
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology Cont’d - Particle Swarm Optimization
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology Cont’d - Particle Swarm Optimization
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Methodology – PSO Algorithm
Implementation steps with a computer software
1. Choose the number of particles
2. Initialize the position of the particles
3. Evaluate the objective function at the initial position
4. Set the iteration number as t = t+1
5. Find the personal best for each particles
6. Find the global best
7. Find the velocities of the particles
8. Find the new value of the particles’ position
9. Find the objective function value of the new particle’ position
SLIDE 19
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – Alkaline Characterization
Atomic Absorption Spectrometer
Average oxide
Mg(OH)2 Ca(OH)2
Samples NaoH mg/g concentration
mg/g mg/g
mg/g
Irvingia According to the
Gabonensis 1.975 6.678 11.102 6.585 International Union of Pure
mesocarp and Applied Chemistry
(2005), the minerals present
Treculia
in alkalis (alkaline materials)
Africana 1.664 6.098 10.081 5.946 are magnesium, calcium,
husk sodium, and oxides.
Palm Fruit
0.812 9.676 12.056 7.515
Fiber
Aloe Vera 0.948 4.898 9.457 5.101
Plantain
2.899 8.666 9.987 7.184
stalk
SLIDE 20
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – Polymer Characterization
Irvingia Gabonensis mesocarp and Treculia Africana husk have the highest percentage mass
of polymers and are chosen as the polymers for the ASP flooding.
SLIDE 21
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – Surfactant Characterization
The presence of saponin in a plant is an indication of its ability to behave like surfactant.
SLIDE 22
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Results – Performance of Single Plant Agent
4.5 Plantain Stalk Ash Palm Husk Ash
5
4
4.5
3.5
4
3
3.5
oil recovered (ml)
2.5
3
Oil Recovered
2 2.5
1.5 2
1 1.5
0.5 1
0 0.5
0.10% 0.20% 0.40%
0
Aloe vera concentration
0.50% 1.00% 2.00%
Concentration of alkaline
Figure 3: Recovery performance of surfactant flooding
100.00 Bush Beans Ogbono Mesocarp
Figure 4: Recovery performance of alkaline flooding
90.00
80.00
Oil recovered (%)
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00 Figure 5: Recovery performance of alkaline flooding
0.00
0.20% 0.50% 1.00%
Concentration of polymer solution SLIDE 23
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – Consortium (Double) Performance
45.00 67:33 83:17
40.00
35.00 29:71
30.00
25.00
Oil Recovered (%)
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
Plantain Stalk Ash @ 2% + Aloevera @0.4% + Ogbono plantain Stalk Ash @2% +
Ogbono Mesocarp @ 1% Mesocarp @1% Aloe vera @0.4%
Slurry concentration
SLIDE 24
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – ASP Performance
80.00
ASP Waterflooding
70.00
60.00
Oil Recovered (%)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
3000 4000 5000 6000
Pressure (psi)
SLIDE 25
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – PSO Model of Experimental Outcome
Particle Movement
10000
9000
8000
7000
Particle Cost
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
6 Experimented Predicted
VOLUME OF OILRECOVERED
5
4
3
2
1
0
% % 0 0 0 0
1 2 % 41 % 2 % . 5 % 1 % 2 % .2 % . 5 % 1 % .2 % .5 % 1 % 1 % 1 % .4 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% 5
0. 0. 0.
@ @ 0. 0 @ @ 0 0 @ 0 0 @ @ @ 0 3 4 5 6
@ @ @ @ sh sh @ sh sh s @ s @ ns @ @ r p M M @ @ @ @ @
era era era Ash k A k A Ash k A k A an an
l l s s B ea arp arp oca + O + O era ASP ASP ASP ASP
e V e V e V lk
a S ta Sta usk Hu Hu Be Be
sh soc soc es 2% 4% e v
o o o t sh ush Bu me me o m @ 0. o
Al Al Al in S tain tain H lm lm u n + Al
a a B B no ono b o P S A r a @
n ta lan lan Palm P P o g 2%
la P P b b O v e
P Og Og loe SA
@
A P
SAMPLES
R2 0.6358
SLIDE 28
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Result – Economic Evaluation
The economic parameters are presented below
Days of production per annum equals 360
Number of years of profitability analysis equals 6years Items Cost ($/bbl)
Crude oil price of $60 per barrel was used Lifting 0.67
Corporate Income Tax (CIT) of 30% was charged on Water handling 0.08
assessable profit. Water injection 0.12
The royalty of 12.5% was used
Fixed annual cost ($/year) 10,000
Water softening 0.56
Operating expedition for the ASP flooding
Alkali 0.13
Parameter Value Surfactant 1.16
Polymer 1.25
NPV (M$) 119352.816
P/I 1.79
SLIDE 29
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Conclusion
The study concludes that almost all samples have more than one active compound present,
1
therefore, making them very prolific as they complement themselves.
It further concludes from the core flooding experiments that the formulated ASP slurry was effective
2
as can be observed by the high additional oil recovery of up to 40% OOIIP.
The economic analysis proves that using these materials for ASP flooding would be very profitable,
3 as illustrated by the low payback period (1.589 yrs.) and the high internal rate return (65%) etc. this
will also encourage farming of these materials and reduction of environmental pollution.
As observed from the analysis and evaluation, the particle swarm optimization algorithm optimized
the developed model to an average absolute relative error of 0.085970, a sum of squared error of
4
3.4862, a standard deviation of 0.6299 and a coefficient of fitness of 0.6358, presenting a good
prediction correlation for the volume of oil produced.
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Recommendation
i. The outcome of the laboratory result should be modeled with a reservoir simulator to
capture reservoir heterogeneities.
ii. Modification and optimization of the core flooding experimental setup to prevent fluid
losses and accumulation within the core holder and accommodate formation temperature
iv. Pilot testing should be done with these materials to affirm the laboratory results.
SLIDE 31
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Contribution to Knowledge
i. Irvingia Gabonensis mesocarp, Treculia Africana husk, Aloe Vera, plantain stalk and palm
fruit fiber, have been characterized and found to contain chemical compounds used in
different fields and, more importantly, as agents for alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP)
flooding.
ii. Development of a new mathematical correlation for predicting the volume of oil recovered
as a function of the volume and concentration of chemical injected.
iii. Evaluation of the profitability of the system based on some economic criteria (NPV, IRR,
PBP and P/I)
SLIDE 32
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007
Thank You For Listening
PG/PHD/FEN/17/007