Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 RBS Residentification Class
2 RBS Residentification Class
1
From the previous session
• Strategy- direction
• Growth
• Business model
2
The reality of resources
• Resources come into play immediately after
the firm is formed
– There are a few resources within the firm, as
compared to that available outside in the market
– The firm becomes an owner- has some kind of
ownership right over different resources
– The nature of resources change with the evolution
of the firm
3
Characteristics of a resource
• Classification- typology
• Location
• How do we measure/quantify it/identify it
4
Creating value from resources
• Resource combinations- indicated by the
business model/value chain
• Leverage into new contexts where the
resource is relevant
• Use it commercially/sell it to realise value for
the firm
5
Assets
6
Assets
• Human
• Non- Human-
– Financial
– Physical- plant and machinery, land
– Legal- IP
• Intangible vs tangible
– Knowledge, informal processes
• Organizational
– Culture, structure, processes, brand, networks
7
Types of competencies/capabilities
8
Competencies and capabilities
• Threshold
• Non-core and Complementary
• Core
9
How to identify competencies
10
How to identify competencies/res
• Activity based- value chain, activity map,
business model
• Product/market based- product/market
matrix, Competency tree
• Resource Audit/Identify nuggets- functional,
• Use of internal/external capabilities for
resource identification
• Understanding micro linkages of cap-skills =>
task specific=>functional=> cross functional
11
Identifying resources on the value
chain
• The value chain can be used to understand the
resources at each activity level
• Where is it used- at what level?
12
13
Concept of business model
• Value proposition: the offering; the target
customer; the basic strategy to win customers
and gain competitive advantage
• Value Creation and delivery system: Resources
and Capabilities; Organization (the value
chain, activity system, business processes);
position in the value network
• Value capture- Revenue sources; the
economics of the business
14
Going from resources to resource
combinations
15
Impact of resources
• Implications of combinations
– Eg. Impact of defense forced based on
• Skills: soldiering and weapon training
• Cultural traditions: Independent action, adherence to
mission
• Commitment to ideology- motivation
• General staff- overall coordination
• Combination of all the above
– Differences of team performances when the coach
changes
– Each resource- importance and relative strength
16
Decisions after resource
identification
• What decisions does a value chain/business
model analysis enable you to take?
17
Decisions after resource
identification
• Which resources in which activity?
• Vertical integration
• Scale/scope of operations
• Location of operations
• Linkages across different parts of the value
chain
18
• How do we go about identifying the
resources?- benefits/costs of audit vs activity
approach
• Using both approaches to identify resources
• Is there a pattern to the accumulation of
resources? What patterns can be identified?
19
20
Resources and capabilities
21
Using functional divisions to
approximate capabilities
22
Functional capabilities of organizational capabilities
Functional area Capabilities Examples
Functional area Financial control Capabilities
CORPORATE Examples
ExxonMobil, PepsiCo,
Functional area Management development Capabilities Examples
General Electric, Shell,
FUNCTIONS
CORPORATE Financial control ExxonMobil,
CORPORATE Strategic
Financial Innovation
control Google, Haier, Unilever,
ExxonMobil,
FUNCTIONS Management development
Multidivisional coordination PepsiCo, General
Shell, Cisco Systems,
FUNCTIONS Management
Strategic
AcquisitionInnovationdevelopment
management PepsiCo, General
Electric, Shell,
Strategic
Multidivisional
International Innovation
coordination
management Electric,Haier,
Google, Shell,
Multidivisional
Acquisition coordination
management Google, Haier,
Unilever, Shell, Cisco
Acquisition management
International management Unilever,
Systems, Shell, Cisco
Management Comprehensive, integrated MIS network linked to
International management Walmart,
Systems, Dell
information managerial decision making computers
Management Comprehensive, integrated MIS network Walmart, Dell
RESEARCH
Management
information AND Research
Comprehensive,
linked to managerial integrated
decisionMIS network
making IBM, Merck,Dell
Walmart,
computers 3M, Apple
DEVELOPMENT
information Innovative new productdecision
linked to managerial developmentmaking computers
Fast
RESEARCH AND Research cycle new product development IBM, Merck, 3M,
RESEARCH AND Innovative
DEVELOPMENT Research new product development IBM, Merck, 3M,
Apple
OPERATIONS
DEVELOPMENT Fast Efficiency
Innovative in volume
newproduct manufacturing
product development Toyota,
Apple Harley
Continuous improvementsdevelopment
cycle new in operations Davidson
Fast cycleand
Flexibility new product
speed development
of response
OPERATIONS Efficiency in volume manufacturing Toyota, Harley
OPERATIONS
PRODUCT Efficiency
Continuous inimprovements
Design capability volume manufacturing
in operations Toyota,
DavidsonHarley
Apple, Nokia, P&G, J&J,
DESIGN Continuous
Flexibility improvements
and speed of response
Brand Management in operations Davidson
L’Oreal
MARKETING Flexibility
Building and speed
reputation of response
for quality
PRODUCT Responsiveness
Design capability to market trends Apple, Nokia, P&G,
PRODUCT
DESIGN DesignManagement
Brand capability Apple,
J&J, Nokia, P&G,
L’Oreal
DESIGN
Sales and
MARKETING Brand Management
Effective
Building sales promotion
reputation for and execution
quality J&J, L’Oreal
Pepsoco, Pfizer
MARKETING
distribution Efficiency and speed
Building reputation
Responsiveness to of processing
for
marketquality
trends
Speed of distribution
Responsiveness to market trends 23
Customer service
The hierarchical nature of capabilities
Resources
24
Strategic resource mapping?
• Trying to map individual resources to the
competencies
25
Assessing quality of capabilities
• Identify the major capabilities you believe your firm needs to
have to "play" in your competitive environment
26
Dynamic capabilities
Session 7
27
What changes and what remains?
• Developing anchors for change
• What should not change
• Existing core competencies
• Core values
28
IBM- Identified reasons for struggling
business
• The existing management system rewards execution directed at short-
term results and does not value strategic business building.
“Breakthrough thinking” was not a valued leadership capability
• The company is preoccupied with current served markets and existing
offerings.
• The business model emphasizes sustained profit and EPS improvement
rather than actions oriented towards higher price/earnings.
• The firm’s approach to gathering and using market insight (fact based
analysis is inadequate for embryonic markets.
• The company lacks established disciplines for selecting,
experimenting, funding, and terminating new growth businesses.
• Once selected, many new ventures fail in execution
29
IBM- EBO revenue as a percent of total revenue
30
Dynamic capability
• “capacity of an organization to purposefully create,
extend or modify its resource base’
• ‘Includes the capacity with which to identify the need or
opportunity for change, formulate a response to such a need or
opportunity and implement a course of action (different dynamic
capabilities may serve these different purposes)
• Capacitity to
• Sense and shape opportunities and threats
• TO seize opportunities and
• To maintain competitiveness through enhancing, combining,
protecting and where necessary- reconfiguring the business
enterprise’s intangible and tangible assets
31
Dynamic capabilties- not easily acquired
• IBM(1993-2004)
• Kodak
• Boeing
32
Percentage of Tires Shipped by Construction Type: 1961-1989
Sources: Rubber Manufacturers Association, “Tire Shipments by Construction,” Tire Industry Facts
(Akron, Ohio, 1990); Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, “Sales Forecasts,” Corporate Archives
(Akron, Ohio, 1980).
Citation:
Sull, Donald. “The Dynamics of Standing Still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the Radial Revolution,” Business History Review, 1999, pp. 430-464. 33
Disk Drive Industry Evolution
146 firms founded; 125 failures
2.5”
Prairietek, Quantum,
Market 3.5” Conner, Western Digital
14”
Control Data, IBM, Memorex,
Diablo, DEC, Ampex
35
Paths
• Sub-optimal lock in: there are competing technologies and strong increasing
returns, "one technology will come to dominate the market, and it is not possible
to predict -ex ante- which of the technologies will do so. It is likely, however, that
the technology which first makes large advances along its learning curve will
emerge dominant"
• Path creation (mindful deviation) vs path dependency
36
Capabilities linked to modifying the
resources
• Sensing
• Seizing
• Reconfiguring assets
37
Effect of competitive environment on
performance
• Firms deploying dynamic capabilities in highly competitive markets
will benefit because “when rivalry is fierce, companies must innovate
in both products and processes, explore new markets, find novel ways
to compete, and examine how they will differentiate themselves from
competitors.” In highly competitive environments, responding to
competitive challenges through opportunity identification activities
should also prepare organizations better for survival.
• Thus, the effects of dynamic capabilities are enhanced when the
company faces some degree of competitive intensity, as otherwise the
organization may not require, or put to use, dynamic capabilities to the
same extent and, as a result, the development of such capabilities may
come at a cost that exceeds the benefits
38
Other important ‘routines’ that impact capabilities
39
Dynamic capabilities: eg. Product
development
• Routines involve cross functional teams
• Routines that ensure concrete and joint experiences among team
members such as working together to fix specific problems or
brainstorming together
• Common consumer visits and feedback
• External communication facilitated by strong leaders
40
Thus , dynamic capabilities indicate
• Propensity to change the resource base
• Propensity to sense opportunities and threats
• Propensity to make timely decisions
• Propensity to make market oriented decisions
41
Fast response
• Mechanisms to increase speed
• Flexible organizational structures, peripheries and organizational
boundaries
• Organizational slack
• Flexible and agile organizational forms that can accommodate novelty and
innovation
• Modularity- organization, products
• Ambidextrous learning organizations- organizations that can change
as well as learn
42
‘Flexibility’
• Being agile- fast on one’s feet
• Ability to move rapidly
• Change course to take advantage of an opportunity or to side step a
threat
• Ability to be versatile- doing different things and applying different
capabilities depending on the needs of a particular situation
43
Event pacing: traditional response
• Response to events such as:
• Moves by competition
• Response to a new technology
• Follow a plan and deviate when performance begins to weaken
44
Time pacing
• Not to be confused with speed
• Counteracts the natural tendency of managers to wait too long, move
too slowly and lose momentum
• Helps set the pace for change
• Is regular, rhythmic and proactive
45
Time pacing
• Phased product/service introductions
(British Airways)
• Target of revenues from new products(3M, Gillette)
• Market expansion/entering new markets (Starbucks)
• Time paced capacity build up
• Launching new businesses
46
Time based performance metrics
• Measures based on time- such as elapsed time, speed, rate
• Measuring every critical transition process with at least some time
based measure such as
• Number of products per quarter
• Average time from concept to commercial launch
• Average downtime between products
47
Capabilities created- time pacing
• Managing transitions: shifts from one activity to the next
• Managing rhythm: pace at which companies change
48
Slack
• Extent of resource utilization
• Those resources that an organization possesses that are not
committed to a necessary organizational activity
49
Uses of slack
• Slack as an inducement
• Slack as a resource for conflict resolution
• Slack as a technical buffer
• As a facilitator for strategic behaviour
50
Organizational structure
• Advantages for less formal structures in sensing, seizing and
reconfiguration
51
‘Flexible’ organizational forms
• Multi functional multi unit teams
• Sub contracting
• Collaborative partnerships
52
‘Flexibility’
• Being agile
• Fast movement
• Able to change course
• Take advantage of an opportunity or side step a threat
• Resilience to shocks
53
Role of modularity in flexibility
• Modular products- incremental additions to basic platforms
• Satisfy changing customer demands by minor alternations in products
• Choice available to the firm- between a faster but partial design or a
slower but complete redesign
54
Unique processes
• E.g Intels system of overlapping project teams which ensures that
there is one project halfway through even when the previous version
of the product is being launched
• Cisco’s system of letting its customers decide on which technologies
(and hence firms) are important.
55
Issues in dynamic capabilities
• Strategic learning and change
• Technological innovation and adaptation
• Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities
• Ambidexterity as dynamic capabilities
• Strategic alliances
56
Strategic learning and change
• knowledge assets that are leveraged into human capital and organizational
capabilities through learning mechanisms on multiple levels
• creation, recombination and integration of knowledge is crucial to the firm’s
overall innovation capacity
• the dynamization of the RBV- towards issues of strategic learning and change.
57
Technological innovation and adaptation
• Technological adaptation may be inhibited by organizational routines,
such as process management practices, that disadvantage incumbents
in the face of radical discontinuities
• In particular, pre-existing capabilities have an impact on the choice of
sourcing modes that, in turn, affect the acquisition of new capabilities
58
Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities
• Components of capabilities and to investigate how they interrelate across the
individual and the collective levels
• a knowledge-based view of corporate acquisitions
• integration capabilities and learning mechanisms that foster post-acquisition
knowledge spillovers.
59
Ambidexterity as dynamic capability
• Ambidextrous organizations are able both to explore new
knowledge domains and to exploit current ones.
• Factors that promote ambidexterity include integration
mechanisms at the senior team level, intellectual capital
architectures, total quality management, organizational
design, executive leadership and managerial cognition
60
Strategic alliances
• Learning from alliance partners- what enables firms to
source knowledge beyond their own boundaries and what the
outcomes of such processes are.
• what kind of experience a firm has gained from previous
alliances and how this is combined with internal sourcing
strategies
• how firms can retain knowledge that they have sourced
outside their boundaries and how they can use
interorganizational relations to extend their knowledge base
• Vertical scope- strategic outsourcing
61
62
Evolution of RBV
• Ricardian
• Selznick etc – distinctive capabilities
• Penrosean
• Demsetz etc- anti- trust studies
68
Introduction stage
Late 80s
• Barney, 1986 Theorized about how organizational culture
could be a source of sustained competitive advantage
• Dierickx & Cool, 1989 Developed the notion that
resources are especially useful when no effective
substitutes are available
• Barney, 1991 Presented and developed the core tenets of
RBV; presented a detailed definition of resources; and
articulated the full set of characteristics that make a
resource a potential source of competitive advantage (i.e.,
valuable, rare, inimitable, and nonsubstitutable)
70
90s
• Harrison, Hitt, Hoskisson, & Ireland, 1991 Highlighted the
value of resources and synergy between resources in the
context of diversification
• Castanias & Helfat, 1991 Characterized CEOs as firm
resources that possess varying (idiosyncratic) qualities
and quantities of general, industryspecific, and firm-
specific skills
• Fiol, 1991 Organizational identity proposed as a core
competency leading to competitive advantage
• Conner, 1991 Juxtaposed the RBV with industrial-
organization economics in order to demonstrate that RBV
was developing as a new theory of the firm
71
---2000s--
• Makadok & Barney, 2001 Built theory about the
information firms should emphasize as they attempt to
purchase scarce resources
• Makadok, 2001 Synthesized ideas on excess profits
offered by RBV and theory on dynamic capabilities
• Lippman & Rumelt, 2003 Initiated discussion of the micro-
foundations of RBV by introducing a payments
perspective
• Ireland, Hitt, & Sirmon, 2003 Introduced strategic
entrepreneurship as recognizing the resources required to
exploit growth opportunities in order to create and sustain
competitive advantage
76
-2000s--
• Winter, 2003 Introduced and explained the concept of
higher order capabilities
• Gavetti, 2005 Built theory about the micro-foundations of
dynamic capabilities by emphasizing the roles of cognition
and hierarchy
• Foss & Foss, 2005 Built conceptual bridges between RBT
and property rights theory
• Teece, 2007 Specified the nature and micro-foundations
of the capabilities necessary to sustain superior enterprise
performance in an open economy with rapid innovation
and globally dispersed sources of invention, innovation,
and manufacturing capability
77
--2000s to 2010
• Sirmon, Hitt, & Ireland, 2007 Built theory about the
underexplored processes (i.e., the “black box”) that lie
between resources on the one hand and superior
profitability on the other
• Armstrong & Shimizu, 2007 Reviewed and critiqued the
research methods used in resource-based inquiry
• Crook, Ketchen, Combs, & Todd, 2008 Used meta-
analysis to establish that strategic resources explain a
significant portion of variance in performance across
extant evidence
• Kraaijenbrink, Spender, & Groen, 2010 Considered the
merits of prominent critiques of RBT
78
Way forward
• RB- strategy framework
• Problems- tautology etc
• Empirical support
• Integration with other perspectives- TC,
Agency etc- further swings of the pendulum
82
Core competence
• Core competence as: the result of the cumulative
learning process that takes place within an
organization about how to coordinate and deploy
assets and capabilities [from a macro level], and is
carried mainly by a superior technological
advantage.
• Unique combination of knowledge, capabilities,
structures, technologies and processes in an
organization, which makes it possible to provide
products or services which absolutely no other
organization can produce in the same way, at the
same moment and at the same speed.
88
OPERATIONS/TECHNOLOGY
CAPABILITIES
Session 5
89
Technological capabilities
• Traditionally seen as a requirement to align technology to
the strategy- must for effective implementation
• “strategic management of technology”
91
What is technology?
92
---Assessing technology
• Assessing costs and benefits of new technologies
(patents, annual contribution from new products/
processes)
• Life cycle position of new technologies
• Emergent technologies not yet used by the organization
• Phases (design, development, production, marketing,
post-marketing) where the top management spends its
time
95
Market 1 Product 1
Product 2
Market 2 Product 3
Product 4
96
Precision Fine
Mechanics Optics
Micro-
Electronics
98
Steering Capability
• Path Finding Capability
• Decision Making And Implementing Capability
• Integrating Capability
109
Operationalising capabilities
• Deciding indicators for different levels for each capability
• Rating the organization on each of these capabilities
• Understanding the gap and resources required for
reaching the desired level
110
Levels of capabilities
1. The linkage between the HR policies, tools
and practices
2. HR capabilities that are indicated by a
reputation (with a lag)
3. Indicated by outcome measures such as
metrics of HR performance
if the firms do well in the HR variables, they would be able to
manage organizational performance as well as ensure maximum
performance from the individuals in the organizations
117
Resources
• Human capital
• HR Practices,
• Organizational routines and processes- including
learning routines
• Intellectual capital including knowledge
• Organizational climate
118
Desired outcomes
- Best places to work
- High employee productivity
- High employee engagement
- High organization performance induced by improvement in
innovation and efficiently and other metrices
- Manage performance of a firm, leverage technology and
maintain levels on parameters such as safety and
sustainability, and also create resources across both
permanent and temporary and full time/ at home employees
119
Human capital
• Individual competencies- to innovate, network,
perform required tasks
• Attitude
• Types of employees- temporary vs permanent,
generalists vs specialists, ability to manage at
different scales, top management team- Infosys
• Employee capabilities impacted by variables such
as job satisfaction and training that are impacted
by HR practices
120
Organizational climate
• Impacted by Culture, Control systems
131
Nature of leadership
• Thought leadership- executing growth, market insight,
strategic (long term) orientation
• People and organizational leadership- change,
organizational capability, team leadership, collaborating
and influencing
• Business leadership- Customer impact, results orientation
133
Location of HR capabilities
• Within the functional domain of HRM
• Within line managers
• As a separate shared function- with options
• be an extension of the HRM department
• as an infrastructure
• located within one of the business units,
• an internal joint venture
136
137
What is a platform
• A platform is a business model that creates value by facilitating
exchanges between two or more interdependent groups, usually
consumers and producers.
• In order to make these exchanges happen, platforms harness and create
large, scalable networks of users and resources that can be accessed on
demand. Platforms create communities and markets with network
effects that allow users to interact and transact.
138
Players in a platform ecosystem
139
Network effects
• Demand side economies of scale
• Enhanced by technologies that enable efficiencies in social networking,
demand aggregation, app development,
• Suppliers and customers may be seen as resources
140
Roles within platforms
• Accretive vs depletive roles
• Platform competition from unrelated industries
• Competition from established platforms with superior network effects
• Target an overlapping customer base with a distinctive new offering that
leverages network effects
• Competition from platforms that collect the same set of data as your firm
141
Shift from being a pure ‘pipeline’ business to
a platform business
• Resource control to resource orchestration
• Internal optimization to external interaction
• Change from focus on customer value to ecosystem value
142
Resources in platforms
• Strong up front design that can attract the desired participants, and
enable the desired interactions
• Start with a single type of high value interaction, and spread the
scope later
• Categories of resources in platforms
• Resources that enable a firm to create a platform
• Resources that enable a firm to leverage a platform to create profits
• Resources that enable a firm to enter a market where competing platforms
are already dominant
• Resources that enable a firm to resist attacks from competing platforms
143
Access openness and resource openness
• Access openness refers to the granting of access to external
complementors to participate and conduct business on a platform by
providing them with dedicated resources to interact with the
platform. For example, a host can provide interfaces, such as APIs
(Application programming interface), to allow outside developers to
create new apps on top of the platform. Here, access refers to the
access to participate.
• By contrast, resource openness refers to opening the platform’s
valuable resources by forfeiting the IPR of the resource. For example,
a platform owner can opensource a platform’s codebase
144
Examples of platforms
• Google Search, Facebook, Amazon Web Services, Amazon
Marketplace, Android
145
Differences between various platforms
• Platforms are very different in how they create network effects,
interactions they enable, approaches to solving “chicken and egg”
problems (do you build the demand side first or the supply side?),
openness levels, growth dynamics, subsidies, competitive strategies
and monetisation methods
• Getting the critical mass is important in getting a platform started.
Getting the first 1000 or million customers may be the most difficult.
Hence resources that enable firms to achieve this may be critical.
146
Platform forking
• A hostile firm, i.e., a forker, bypasses the host’s controlling boundary
resources and exploits the platform’s shared resources, core and
complements, to create a competing platform business.
• For example, Amazon has created its proprietary Fire OS platform,
which appropriated the open platform core of the Android
OpenSource Project (AOSP). Furthermore, Amazon has not only
copied Android’s core but has expanded the exploitation to its app
complements that are shared for distribution
• Response to forking- e.g. Google’s responses, which modified
Android’s boundary resources to curb exploitation and retain control
147
• Technically, a platform fork “forks” the platform’s core, but
strategically the technical fork is a means to create a new platform
that directly competes with the host platform while maintaining
compatibility with it. Compatibility offers a means to exploit the host
platform’s complementarities, especially its apps.
• creating a fork of the platform core saves at least between $1 and $2
billion in initial development cost and provides significant additional
savings in each subsequent version if the forker manages to maintain
compatibility
148
Platform envelopment
• “platform envelopment strategies,” whereby a dominant platform
(the enveloper) operating in a multi-sided market (the origin market)
enters a second multi-sided market (the target market) by leveraging
the data obtained from its shared user relationships.
• effects of “privacy policy tying,” a strategy whereby the enveloper
requests consumers to grant their consent to combining their data in
both origin and target markets. This may allow the enveloper to fund
the services offered to all sides of the target market by monetizing
data in the origin market, monopolize the target market, and
entrench its dominant position in the origin market
• Here the resource used is “another attractive platform”
149
Impact of platform envelopment strategies
• Leverage shared user relationships and/or common components. For
example, Google entered into mobile operating systems by bundling
Android with Google Search, two separate platforms, in order to,
among other possible goals, leverage the data generated by users of
both platforms. Such data were effectively monetized through
Google’s online advertising platforms. This strategy allowed Google to
fund its entry in a way that could not be replicated by other
competitors and contributed to its eventual dominance of the mobile
operating system market
150
• Platform envelopment strategies are viable not only when bundling
platforms that are complements but also when they are weak
substitutes or are functionally unrelated. Google entered online
display advertising by bundling DoubleClick’s online display platform
and its own online search platform, which were regarded as
complements by many advertisers and weak substitutes by others
• Facebook or Alibaba, penetrated retail banking by combining a
payment system platform with its online advertising businesses
151
Volumes as a resource
• A (positive) membership externality exists when the value received
by a member of one side increases with the number of members on
the same or another side. In the case of social networks, users benefit
from being able to reach out to a larger number of users. As another
example, consumers benefit more from a restaurant reservation
platform if they have more restaurants to choose from when making a
reservation. This is a traditional indirect network externality. A
(positive) usage externality exists when the members of a group
benefit when members of the same or the other group intensify their
use of the platform. For example, users of a social network may
benefit when other users post additional content.
152
“When a platform enters a pipeline firm’s
market, the platform almost always wins”
153
Impact of platforms-1
• Platform creates a new type of online marketplace and increase
the exchanges among various businesses in the global scope. For
instance, the Chinese e-commerce platform, Alibaba.com is a
business-to-business website, connecting manufacturers from a
variety of countries with buyers around the world.
154
Impact of platforms-2
• Platform features an infrastructure that brings external sellers
and buyers together, regardless of sources through data-driven
matchmaking, with little internal resources or inventory. In
business logistics and supply change management, it can go
beyond the just-in-time delivery and reach zero inventory
through platform.
155
Impact of platforms- 3
• The network effect has shifted from traditional business-to-
business network or managerial ties to the platform based
virtual business networks in the global business market.
Platform becomes a business hub attracting many sellers and
buyers all over the world through internet. Therefore, the
network effect is enhanced in the digital platform.
156
Impact of platforms-4
• The platform has displaced traditional intermedia in the
connected ecosystem. The role of sellers and buyers in the
platform ecosystem is flurrying in the digital age in which a
producer and a user can swap with each other. As such, a buyer
can become a seller and a seller can become a buyer in an
interactive way. Such a swap effect attracts more participants
and accelerates the market expansion.
157
Impact of platforms-5
• Platform in the shared economy has expanded the opportunity
for business-to-business crowding sourcing and crowd funding,
creating values by unlocking the spared resources. Given the
platform openness, companies can have a wide access to
external sources for new product development, idea generation
and innovation through the various types of business platform.
158
Example of a platform- Sports league
• E.g. Cricket T20 leagues- Components of the platform
• Franchisee teams- whose owners bid to have their own teams (Revenue for
the platform)
• Well known players who have their own following (who are contracted by the
teams)
• Cricket boards of different countries who get a share from their contracted
players revenues
• Sponsors of the tournaments for different years
• Viewers of the matches- both in the stadium and through television
• TV companies that bid for the right to telecast live matches
• Business firms that pay to telecast their ads in these matches
• How are the different platform components mobilised?
159
Competing for value- T20 cricket leagues
• Inter-nation cricket series, multinational tournaments
• Other formats of the game
• Different boards of the cricket playing countries who earn their
revenues from their domestic and international matches
• Owners of cricket stadiums in different parts of the world
• Other T20 leagues in other countries
160
E.g. how does competition of IPL have
cooperation and competition with this platform
• IPL vs ICL
• IPL Vs Other country leagues- e.g. BBL
• IPL Vs other formats
• Which resource ensures that IPL has a competitive advantage over
other competitors?
161
162
MARKETING CAPABILITIES
Session 4
163
Marketing capabilities
• Which are the complex bundles of knowledge and skills
for carrying out marketing activities that are deeply
embedded in organizational processes.
• These capabilities are likely in areas such as digital
marketing, Marketing Tech platforms, and marketing
analytics where companies are trying to get up to speed
fast
164
FIRM ORIENTATION
Low High
Propensity to meet future needs
174
CRM capabilities
• Firm’s ability to identify customers and prospects
• Initiate and maintain relationships with attractive customers
• Leverage these relationships into customer-level profits
• (This may weed out some of the less profitable customers
and hence reduce revenues but overall margins may
increase)
180
Co-creation
• The mobilisation of forethought,
• Using the collective intelligence of customers
• Using customer competence, managing personalised
experiences, shaping expectations
• Converting ‘just in time’ knowledge of customers to ‘just in
time’ learning for the company
184
Cocreation- principles
• Value for stakeholders to ensure participation
• Focus on rewarding experiences for all stakeholders
• Provide options for stakeholders to interact with one
another.
• Provide platforms that allow stakeholders to interact and
share their experiences.
• Crowd sourcing as a type of co-creation
185
Managing relationships
• Client relationship scorecard (eg. Infosys- training
employees to build transformational relationships)
• Use of social media to build relationships and maintain
appropriate communication links
• Using customer for financing
188
Course Objective
• To understand the types and characteristics of resources
associated with the organization
• To learn the methods for assessing the resource needs of
the organization; and
• To understand the process of resource acquisition,
retention and development
193
AOL focus
• The course will focus on the learning goal of decision
making, along with the goal of functional learning in
strategy. The learning goal of decision making will be
covered in the case through use of cases which will
provide the context for analysis on all key topics. The level
of decision making skill will be evaluated through a written
examination (mid term) involving cases on which specific
questions will be asked that address each dimension of
decision making.
194
Evaluation component
End-Term 40%
Mid term exam 25%
Assignments 20%
Class Presentation 5%
The overall grades, based on the relative performance of the participants.
For assignment – On any of the topics discussed in the course- analysis of one or
more firms with regard to these topics- Format- Around 6-8 pages of text, analysis in
your own words, 12 font, 1.5 line spacing, 1 inch margins, no photographs, On cover
page- only title and names/roll numbers of all group members.
For presentation, answer questions, submit slides before the sessions, presentations
to happen during the session.
195
Value disciplines
• Operational excellence,
• Customer intimacy,
• Product leadership
216
Ansoff Matrix
• Market penetration
• Market development
• Product development
• Diversification
228
Portfolio models
• BCG Matrix
• GE Grid
229
Visualize movement
from 1 to 3, and 2
being the bridge
230
Real options
• Firms establish options by making an initial
investment, for example by performing a market test,
creating a joint venture, developing a prototype, or
purchasing an operating license (e.g., in the mining
or telecommunications industries). If the economic
prospects of the project turn out to be favorable, a
firm may later decide to exercise the option—that is,
to launch the new product, to purchase the
remaining capital of the joint venture, to build a plant
for the new technology, or to operate the acquired
license. Conversely, if economic circumstances are
unfavorable, it will abandon the option
231