Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enter Pre Ner Ship
Enter Pre Ner Ship
By Fekadu Tefera
fektefe@gmail.com
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
entrepreneurship,
and self-employment,
Create awareness of enterprise and self-
employment as a career option,
Recognize the role of micro, small and medium
enterprises in reducing poverty,
Comprehend link of innovation with micro,
small and medium-sized enterprises,
Justify the significance of modern
entrepreneurship for economic sustainability
and reducing poverty in developing countries,
Explain the need for self-employment,
Manage significant issues faced when starting a
new firm.
Contents
Unit Introduction
This unit is designed to present the basics of
small and micro enterprise.
•We may have also a glance look in to the
medium size firms for comparison purpose.
•We will try to see as detail and manageable
as possible the definition and meanings of
micro, small and medium enterprises.
2.1. Definitions and Common Characteristics of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Overview
•A universal definition of micro and small
enterprise does not exist given the
multitude of different economic, social and
geographic differences with the
international context of micro and small
enterprise. In some countries, micro and
small enterprises are categorized based on
the capital that is invested and in some
other countries based on the employment
opportunity they provide.
In many countries, especially in developing
countries micro & small enterprises are minor
informally organized commercial operations
owned and operated mostly by the poor.
• However, they account for a substantial share of
the total employment and gross domestic
product (GDP) contribute significantly to the
alleviation of poverty and income creation.
2.1.1 Meanings of Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises
MSE “Micro- and Small Enterprise,” SME (“Small
and Medium Enterprise”) and MSME (“Micro-,
Small and Medium Enterprise”) are all widely
used in the writings.
The statistical definition of enterprise size varies
by country, and is usually based on the number
of employees or the value of assets.
As per the multitude of the literature and the
related policies of many countries’ the lower limit
for small-scale enterprises is usually set at 5 to 10
workers and the upper limit at 50 to 100 workers.
• The upper limit for “medium-scale” enterprises is
usually set between 100 and 250 employees.
• For instance, some who define MSEs by employee
number—less than 10 for microenterprises and
10 to 100 for small enterprises.
•*More generally, USAID defines MSEs as
firms with up to fifty workers, which are
engaged in non-primary activities and sell at
least 50 percent of output. This category
includes both microenterprises, which have
up to 10 workers, as well as small
enterprises, which have between 11 and 50
workers. In the case of agriculture, a
microenterprise can be dairy, horticulture,
small livestock, or any crop or agribusiness
that is commercialized.
• The World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES) classifies
enterprises with 5-19 employees as small and those with
20-99 as medium.
• The World Bank Group in-house definition considers
enterprises with 10-49 employees as small, 0-10 as
micro-enterprises and 50-299 as medium-sized.
• The concept of firm size varies significantly within the
different stages of economic development and structure,
as well as the various issues that we intend to address.
• For instance, with regards to small and medium
enterprises, countries with large economies like the U.S.
and member states of the EU use cut-off points of fewer
than 500 workers to describe SMEs.
Yet, in developing countries, where both market size and
average firm size are much smaller, SME cut-off points
are often fewer than 100 workers.
• The lack of consistency in employment-based MSEs
definitions based on the number of employees and
viewed in isolation from the size of markets or the
economy may be misleading.
More importantly, enterprise behavioral characteristics
do not correlate perfectly with employee-size.
• MSEs are a very heterogeneous group. Some scholars
distinguishes MSEs from SMEs and suggests that small-
and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) usually include a
wide variety of firms – village handicraft makers, small
machine shops, restaurants, and computer software
firms.
R. Institutions criteria Remark
N
World Bank
Enterprise Survey
classifies enterprises with 5-19
(WBES) employees as small and those with
20-99 as medium.
• Microenterprises are normally considered to be
family businesses or self-employed persons
operating in the semi-formal and informal sectors;
most have little chance of growing into larger
scale firms, accessing bank finance, or becoming
internationally competitive.
Serving them often requires distinct institutions
and instruments, such as the group-based
lending methodologies used by some
microfinance institutions.
QDiscuss the impact of group-based lending in our
country? So what?
• In contrast, Small and Medium Enterprises
usually operate in the formal sector of the
economy, employ mainly wage-earning workers,
and participate more fully in organized markets.
• Small enterprises consider access to formal
finance a desirable possibility, and are more
likely than microenterprises to grow and become
competitive in domestic and international
markets.
• Various international donors have provided
targeted assistance to advance MSE
development in developing countries with the
same assumptions: that MSEs positively effect
economic growth and poverty reduction.
The support for MSE development on an
international scale is reflected in the desire to find
a middle ground between the structural
adjustment focus of the 1980s and a more holistic
approach that includes considerations for social
development.
• Support for MSE development generally revolves
around presumed comparative advantages of
small firms: relative to large firms, small firms are
believed to, among other things, create more jobs
at a faster rate; be more labor intensive and thus
create employment and training opportunities for
unskilled labor; be more efficient; serve as a
safety net against sudden economic
or household shocks; be a seedbed for
technological innovation and entrepreneurship;
and provide broader non-financial, non-wage
benefits to the working poor, such as greater
access to health care or education.
• Since 2000, USAID, the World Bank Group, the
Inter-American Development Bank and other
agencies have put forth great efforts to promote
private enterprise development. Searching for
further justification to promote smallness as an
instrument of poverty alleviation is not necessary:
it is enough to recognize that microenterprises
and SMEs are theemerging private sector in poor
countries, and thus form the base for private
sector-led growth.
• The rationale for small enterprise intervention
suggests that a small enterprise development
strategy is in reality just a “private sector
development strategy.”
2.1.2.Descriptive Overview of Informal and
Small Business Sectors
The dividing line between the informal sector
and the formal sector is not always a clear one.
Although there is no universally accepted
definition of what constitutes an informal
enterprise, there is consensus that
they are small scale, and operate outside
registration, tax and social security
frameworks, and health and safety rules
for workers, with informal economic activity
being defined by its ‘precarious’
/unstable/nature.
2.1.3. Common MSEs Characteristics
1. They employ few workers,
2. Do not generate high income nor
experience much growth,
3. Do not produce for markets outside
their local environment, etc.
The following demonstrates the common
characteristics and diversities of MSEs
Share of firms and employment;
• In many developing countries, microenterprises
and small-scale enterprises account for the
majority of firms and a large share of
employment, mainly consisting of small firms with
one person working alone or with unpaid family
members.
• Micro and small enterprises are a major source of
livelihood for a significant proportion of the
population in these areas.
common characteristics ………..
Location;
•Location can play a central role in
determining MSE survival. MSEs located in
urban or commercial areas are more likely to
survive than their counterparts in rural
areas.
Gender;
•An increasing number of small firms in
developing countries are headed by women.
• These small firms tend to be concentrated in
relatively specific activities like local drink
brewing,
common characteristics ………..
knitting, dress-making, crocheting, cane-
work, and retail trading.
•MSEs headed by women are less likely to be
based out of their homes.
•Since home-based MSEs tend to be hidden
and overlooked, women owners of MSEs are
more likely to be ‘invisible entrepreneurs.’
Composition of Activities;
• A significant number of small firms are involved in
manufacturing activities. Among these, three
activities have been consistently identified as the
most important categories:
common characteristics ………..
Textiles and apparel,
Food and beverages, and
Wood and forest products.
Sector Distribution;
• Small firm survival rates vary significantly by
sector – small retail trading firms face the highest
risk of closure. Real estate, wood processing,
wholesale traders, and non-metallic mineral
enterprises are the least likely to close, while
trading, transport and chemical MSEs are the
most likely to close /near/.
common characteristics ………..
Initial Enterprise Size;
• There is no direct relationship between an MSE’s
initial size and its survival chances; initial
enterprise size has no significant influence on
firm survival. So, smallness, by itself, is not an
impediment to firm survival. However, growing
enterprises are more likely to survive than those
that remained the same size.
Firm Creation/Contraction;
• MSEs are constantly changing; not only are new
firms being created (new starts or births) while
others are closing, but existing (surviving) firms
are expanding and contracting in size.
common characteristics ………..
These changes are usually summarized in two
concepts: Net firm creation (new starts minus
closure), and “mobility” or net firm expansion
(firm expansion minus firm contraction).
Labor Intensity;
• Small firm expansion boosts employment more
than large firm growth because small firms are
more labor intensive, coinciding with the factor
market structure of most developing countries.
• Many analysts argue that, within industries, for
a given scale of production, small firms are
more labor intensive than large firms.
Common characters..
Job Creation;
• Apart from labor intensity, it is often argued that
small firms are important for employment growth
(i.e. job creation). While small firms experience
both high job creation and destruction rates, it
appears that job destruction during recessions is
lower in small enterprises than in large
enterprises – perhaps due to greater wage
flexibility in small firms. In other words, small firm
owners may temporarily accept lower
compensation during recessions in order to hold
on to their business.
2.1.4 Correlation /Association of Entrepreneurship
and Small Business in the Economic System
• Entrepreneurship and small business are related
but certainly not synonymous concepts. On the
one hand, entrepreneurship is a type of behavior
which concentrates on opportunities rather than
resources. This type of behavior can happen in
both small and large businesses but also
elsewhere.
• Small businesses can be a vehicle for those
entrepreneurs introducing new products and
processes that change the industry and for people
who simply run and own a business for a living.
Many scholars emphasize the role of the
entrepreneur as prime cause of economic
development. They describe how the innovating
entrepreneur challenges incumbent firms by
introducing new inventions that make current
technologies and products obsolete.
In a time when large firms had not yet gained the
powerful position of the 1960s and 1970s, small
businesses were the main supplier of employment
and hence of social and political stability.
The world has changed
In today's world small businesses, and particularly new
ones, are seen more than ever as a vehicle for
entrepreneurship contributing not just to employment
and social and political stability, but also to innovative
and competitive power. In short, the focus has shifted
from small businesses as a social good that should be
maintained at an economic cost to small businesses as a
vehicle for entrepreneurship. With this shift came the
renewed perception of the important role of
entrepreneurship.
Evidence of the change that economic activity moved
away from large firms to small firms in the last few
decades. The most impressive and also the most cited is
the share of the 500 largest American firms, the so-
called Fortune 500. Their employment share dropped
from 20 per cent in 1970 to 8.5 per cent in 1996. similar
case in Europe.
There is ample evidence
• Causes of the change
Scholars provide evidence concerning
manufacturing industries in countries in varying
stages of economic development.
They advance the following explanations for the
shift toward smallness.
• The first deals with fundamental changes in the
world economy from the 1970s on-wards. These
changes relate to the intensification of global
competition, the increase in the degree of
uncertainty and the growth in market
fragmentation.
• The second explanation deals with changes in the
character of technological progress.
• They further show that flexible automation has various
effects resulting in a shift from large to smaller firms.
• The pervasiveness of changes in the world economy, and
in the direction of technological progress results in a
structural shift affecting the economies of all
industrialized countries.
Also others argue that the instability of markets in the
1970s resulted in the demise of mass production and
promoted flexible specialization.
This fundamental change in the path of technological
development led to the occurrence of vast diseconomies
of scale.
Others stress the influence of two trends of industrial
restructuring:
• That of decentralization and vertical disintegration (the
breaking up of large plants and businesses) and
• That of the formation of new business communities.
• In their view, globalization and technological
advancements are the major determinants of this
challenge of the Western countries.
• Consequences of the change
There are four consequences of the increased
importance of small firms:
•A vehicle for entrepreneurship,
•Routes of innovation,
•Industry dynamics and
•Job generation.
We can claim that small firms:
• Being the source of considerable innovative activity!
• Stimulating industry evolution and creating an
important share of the newly generated jobs!
• Play an important role in economy serving as agents of
change by their entrepreneurial activity!
Clearly, there are many more consequences of the
increased share of small firms than the four
mentioned.
• For instance, an increase in the share of small
firms may lead, ceteris paribus to;
•a lower orientation towards import,
•a lower propensity to export employment,
• a qualitative change in the demand for capital
and consultancy inputs,
• more variety in the supply of products and
services.
Despite their entirely different approaches
studies show a positive correlation between
entrepreneurship and economic growth.
• The growth penalty
The industry structure is generally shifting towards
an increased role for small enterprises. The shift
in industry structures has been heterogeneous
and apparently shaped by country-specific
factors.
2.2. Innovation and Special Issues with regard to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises
Overview
Many governments around the world
seem to have openly accepted the
functional economic theory of small and
micro enterprise development as a
pathway toward economic
development.
•Innovation is a key to technology adoption
and creation, and to explaining the vast
differences in productivity across and
within countries.
2.2.1. Innovation in Micro, Small, and Medium
Enterprises
•An innovation is defined as “the
implementation of a new or significantly
improved product (good or service), or
process, a new marketing method, or a
new organizational method in business
practices, workplace organization or
external relations”.
•The minimum requirement for an
innovation is that the product, process,
marketing method, or organizational
method must be new or significantly
improved to the firm.
•This includes both innovations that the
firm in question is the first to develop, as
well as those adopted from other firms or
organizations.
•This general definition of innovation, can
be split into subcomponents of
innovation, defined as:
1. Product innovation: the introduction of a
good or service that is new or
substantially improved.
2. Process innovation: the introduction of a
new or significantly improved production
or delivery method. Involves creating a
new way of producing, selling or
distributing an existing good or service.
3. Marketing innovation: the
implementation of a new marketing
method involving significant changes in
product design or
packaging, product promotion or pricing.
4. Organizational innovation: involves the
creation or alteration of business
practices, workplace organization, or
external relations.
5.Administrative innovation: occurs when
creation of a new organization design
better supports the creation, production
and delivery of goods and services.
Economic models of innovation have
typically focused on product innovation,
and distinguish further two distinct types.
i. The first type is horizontal innovation,
which consists of producing a new
product that does not displace existing
products, thereby expanding the variety
of products produced.
ii. The second type is vertical innovation,
where the introduction of one product
makes an existing product obsolete.
2.2.2. The Link of SMEs Development with the
Process of Poverty Reduction
Q Define the concept poverty in your own
words (4 min)
The Concept of Poverty
•The concept of poverty includes material
deprivation (i.e. food, shelter) and access
to basic services (i.e. health, education).
•It now also tends to encompass a range of
nonmaterial conditions, such as a lack of
rights, insecurity, powerlessness and
indignity.
•The combination of these two types of
conditions provides a more complete
understanding of poverty.
Poverty is a condition in which people;
•Lack satisfactory material resources
(food, shelter, clothing, housing)!
•Are unable to access basic services
(health, education, water, sanitation)!
•Are constrained in their ability to
exercise rights, share power and lend
their voices to
the institutions and processes which affect
the social, economic and political
environments in which they live and work.
Poverty is a vicious circle of poor health,
reduced working capacity, low
productivity and shortened life
expectancy.
Poverty is comprising multiple dimensions of
deprivation that relate to human
capabilities, including consumption and food
security, health, education, rights, voice,
security, dignity and decent work, We can
speak of poor households when the
income generated by the economically active
members is insufficient to satisfy the needs
of all members.
•The approach to poverty reduction through
small enterprise development focuses on
the needs of poor people who are part of
the micro and small enterprise economy, as
owner/operators and workers, as their
dependents, as the unemployed who may
benefit from job creation, and as customers.
The strategy is based on the promotion of the
four elements of decent work, namely,
productive remunerative employment; rights
at work; social dialogue; and social security.
•Poverty reduction should, in addition, be
conducted in the context of environmental
sustainability and gender equity.
•In Attacking Poverty, the World Bank
accepted the view that poverty encompassed
not only material deprivation(measured by
an appropriate concept of income or deprivation)
but also low achievements in education and
health.
•It broadened further the notion of poverty,
however, to include vulnerability and
exposure to risk, and voicelessness and
powerlessness.
•There is increasing recognition that private
sector development has an important role
to play in poverty reduction.
•The private sector, including small and micro
enterprises, creates and sustains the jobs
necessary for poor people to work and earn
the income needed to purchase goods and
services.
A consensus is emerging in the area of Small
and
Micro Enterprise Development (SMED)
about what is needed to support the
creation and expansion of enterprises.
Key areas include:
•A policy, regulatory and legal
environment that is simple, fast,
inexpensive and free from corruption;
•Finance that is accessible at low cost and
does not require the poor to provide
physical collateral;
•Access to affordable business development
services; workers who are trained in
appropriate skills; basic health and
education that strengthens human capital;
•A culture that supports and rewards
entrepreneurship; access to domestic and
global markets on a fair and equal basis
with large enterprises; and reliable
infrastructure (transport, energy,
telecommunications, etc.).
At the same time, a number of critical
concerns remain:
•First, it is unclear how to move the small
enterprise economy from one dominated by
micro and small enterprises (MSEs) to one
dominated by small and medium enterprises
(SMEs).
•Second, there is still insufficient effort being
made to accurately measure the impact of
SMED activities on poverty reduction.
•Thirdly, there remains the critical question
of the extent to which SMED activities
should involve funded intervention and to
what extend they should be commercially
self-sustaining.
The process of working out of poverty has the
following technical areas which contribute to
poverty reduction:
Vocational training,
Entrepreneurship,
Micro-finance,
Cooperatives,
Reducing discrimination,
Working to end child labor,
Ensuring income and
Basic social security and work safety.
• The major social insurance program is known as S ocial
Security.The Social Security program (excluding
Medicare) has grown from less than one-half of 1 percent
of U.S. GDP in 1950 to 4.3 percent of GDP today. That
percentage is projected to grow to 6 percent of GDP in
2030 and slightly higher thereafter. Social Security
contributions are payroll taxes—taxes based on wages
and salaries—used to finance
• Two compulsory Federal programs for retired workers:
Social
• Security (an income-enhancement program) and Medicare
•There are a range of approaches to Small
and Micro Enterprise Development
Programs that can direct to be poverty
reducing and in which different countries are
currently engaged.
These include:
• Reform of the policy, legal and regulatory
environment to make it easier for enterprises to
set-up, grow and create employment; the
building of representative small and micro -
business associations which can advocate for
members and provide growth-enhancing services;
•The creation of private-public-
partnerships which simultaneously create
employment and improve pro-poor
services (such as waste and sanitation);
•Improvements in job quality that increase
productivity, thereby increasing income
and wages;
•Facilitation of better market access;
•The development of rights and services
for the informal economy;
•Facilitating business development
services such as management training;
and
•The promotion of women’s
entrepreneurship and gender equality.
The lack of effective impact assessment for
many of these activities makes it difficult to
determine the extent to which poverty has
been reduced among target groups. It is
clear, however, that in most cases the
target groups are comprised of poor
people and that the activities are likely to
benefit them.
The Nature of Poverty and the Millennium
Agenda
•Central to the problem of poverty is the
availability of work. Work allows people to
produce for themselves and earn the
money needed to buy goods and services.
•It is also from work that wealth is created
which, through taxation, allows
governments to fund pro-poor services
such as health care, clean water and
education.
Work, more specifically decent work, is not
easily created, however. It develops out of
a complex and balanced system of
economic, social and political activity.
•Small and Micro Enterprise Development
(SMED) is about creating an environment
so that owners and workers can work
smarter, work safer and work more
productively.
•In doing so, they can reduce their poverty.
There is an emerging consensus on
poverty
reduction and small enterprises that is
comprised of two central elements:
•The first is that much of the population in
poor countries operates or works for Micro
and Small Enterprises (MSE) and that even in
richer countries, a substantial portion of the
population is employed in Small and
Medium Enterprises (SMEs).
• In poor countries, MSEs are where the poor
are working – either out of choice or out of
necessity.
The second element of the consensus is that the
general functional areas of how to support
private sector development in general, and Small
and Micro Enterprises in particular, are being
established.
The general areas include:
• A policy, regulatory and legal environment that is
simple, fast, inexpensive and free from corruption;
• Finance that is accessible at low cost and does not
require the poor to provide physical collateral;
• Access to affordable business development
services;
• Workers who are trained in appropriate skills;
• Basic health and education that strengthens
human capital;
• A culture that supports and rewards
entrepreneurship;
• Access to domestic and global markets on a fair
and equal basis with large enterprises; and
• Solid infrastructure (transport, energy,
telecommunications, etc.).
۩The emerging consensus is reassuring and
generally helpful in developing pro-poor Small
and Micro Enterprises Development (SMED)
strategies. There is, however, much that
remains untested, unexplored and
unquestioned in this consensus.
QReflection
Discussion on AGOA, what is it? Its
objectives?
Are the objectives realized?
There are three major concerns:
•First, while MSEs are important for
employment in poor countries, we have
not yet fully grasped the long-term
process by which a MSE sector that
provides low incomes and poor working
conditions is transformed into a vibrant
SME sector that provides stable
employment, a good income and decent,
productive working conditions.
•Second, the impact of SED activities on
poverty reduction is not proven.
•Our understanding is growing but it is still
not clear how to assess impact and even
those techniques that are known are often
not used.
•This is a critical problem for donors, NGOs,
governments and international agencies.
• And third, the appropriate balance between
freeing up markets and commercially driven
processes, on the one hand, and support and
intervention from non-private actors is still not
known.
• The implementation of strategies for pro-poor
SED policies and programmes is still in its
infancy.
• A great has been learnt but the learning process
has only begun.
2.2.3. Special Issue of Small Business
Economics
•The social dynamics of small and micro
enterprise in terms of the business firms as
a catalyst for economic activity affected the
aggregate level of an entire economy.
•Entrepreneurship is the ‘social process
involving the efforts of individuals in
activities that ultimately have economic
implications at a regional and/or national
level’.
•The process of the formation of small and
micro enterprises from a capitalist’s
perspective is centrally concerned with
opportunity recognition, discovery and/or
creation and appropriation of value.
•However, a new or small firm with growth
ambitions does not benefit from the
breadth and depth of resources and
capabilities of its larger corporate relative.
•This suggests that the mainstream business
strategy support is inadequate for the
entrepreneurial context and more particularly
falls well short of dealing with strategy that
relates to the entrepreneur and their interaction
with a small and micro enterprises ecosystem
containing resources not under their control.
2.3. Debates on and Major Problems of Micro
and Small Enterprises
Overview
•The existences of micro and small business
enterprise have significant contribution
towards job creation, poverty reduction,
innovation etc.
• Successful small businesses are the primary
engines for economic development such as
income growth and poverty reduction in many
of the developing countries.
• These businesses can also build foundation for
stable communities and gender equality.
• Nonetheless, poor infrastructure, weak public
service, inadequate mechanisms for dispute
resolution and lack of markets to their product
and formal financing remain major
impediments to small business growth.
2.3.1. Arguments on Small Enterprises
What is a Small Enterprise?
• Definitions of small enterprises vary widely.
• The World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES)
classifies enterprises with 5-19 employees as
small and those with 20-99 as medium.
• The World Bank Group in-house definition
considers enterprises with 10-49 employees as
small, 0-10 as micro-enterprises and 50-299 as
medium-sized.
• Some argue that firm size categories are arbitrary
and note that enterprise characteristics are better
described by classifications such as ownership,
degree of formality/informality and
technological sophistication.
Do they Drive Employment Creation?
• Donor support to small enterprises is often
justified by their significant employment share.
The weighted average of researcher findings have
shown that nearly a one-fifth of jobs are with
small enterprises, and almost a half is with SMEs
with both shares rising in low income countries.
How Productive are they?
•A common criticism of small enterprises
is that they have lower levels of
productivity. For instance, a survey made
at Sub Saharan African countries found
that firms with 30 employees have twice
as much value-added per worker than
firms with 5 employees (for firms with 100
employees, it is three times as much),
largely linked to smaller enterprises lower
levels of capital stock per worker.
• Small firms are also less likely to engage in
innovative activities, such as adding new product
lines and incorporating new technologies.
• In contrary, some studies highlight that some small
enterprises are very productive and innovative.
Are they More Pro-Poor than Other Firms?
• Small enterprises also receive significant support
as they are seen as providing more opportunities
for poorer people.
•Over the last decade in Sub-Saharan Africa,
the employment share of household and
micro-enterprises increased more than
formal enterprises as the labor force
increased more rapidly than the formal
sector could create jobs.
•Smaller firms also tend to have lower entry
requirements in terms of skills, education
and qualifications.
•Small enterprises are also important
employers of marginalized groups who
have difficulties finding employment in
larger firms.
What is Holding Back Small Enterprises?
• Small enterprises report more business
obstacles than larger enterprises- however a
debate exists on what the key obstacles are,
with significant implications on policy
responses.
• Access to finance is often viewed as the most
significant obstacle, coming out as the top
constraint in World Bank Enterprise Surveys of
over 45,000 enterprises in 196 countries.
•This is in part as banks see small enterprises
as higher risk and more expensive to
service in proportion to the loan amount.
Women-owned businesses are particularly
handicapped as they have fewer securities-
able assets and weaker property rights.
•Small enterprises also face significant
obstacles in other aspects of the business
environment, such as taxes and regulation,
inflation, corruption and street crime.
• Infrastructure is also a significant problem, in
particular access to electricity, both for smaller
and larger enterprises.
How are Development Actors supporting
them?
• External actors can and do help some small
enterprises grow faster and employ more
people, pay higher wages and better serve the
poor, and development agencies use a number
of approaches in order to do to this.
• Increasing support to national governments to
improve the business environment for small
enterprises is recommended by many scholars.
• No known meta-evaluations evaluate impacts on
small enterprises, but a number of assessments
are online highlighting how reforms can
stimulate access to finance. Though it is unclear
how much this assists survivalist enterprises.
• Several argue it is often not institutional hurdles
holding them back, but rather that they are
looking to manage risk not expand and, as such,
are unlikely to be significantly affected by
changes.
• Still others contends such measures need to be
complemented by more pro-active support, such
as for venture finance, education and training.
•Development agencies also provide this
more direct support, using programmed
approaches which increasingly aim to
build up markets sustainably, such as
value chain development and local
economic development.
•Other stress that interventions should
support enterprises without exposing them
to excessive risk, such as through promoting
access to local markets and crop
diversification. They also call for interventions
to actively rebalance power disparities in
2.3.2 Central Problems which in turn Affect
the Performances of SMEs
•There are some central problems that are
faced by every economy of a country and
in turn have an impact up on the
formation and development of small and
micro enterprises.
•Production, distribution and disposition
of goods and services are the basic
economic activities of life. In the course of
these activities, every society has to face
scarcity of resources.
Because of this scarcity, every society has to
decide how to allocate the scarce
resources.
This leads to following Central Problems
that are faced by every economy:
1) What to produce?
2) How to produce?
3) For whom to produce?
These problems are called central problems
because these are the most basic
problems of an economy and all other
problems revolve around them.
•They are directly related with the problem of
‘Allocation of Resources’. Allocation of
resources refers to the problem of assigning
the scarce resources in such a manner so that
maximum wants of the society are fulfilled.
•In nutshell, an economy has to allocate its
resources and choose from different
potential bundles of goods (what to
produce), select from different techniques of
production (how to produce), and decide in
the end, who will consume the goods (for
whom to produce).
1. What to Produce:
• This problem involves selection of goods and
services to be produced and the quantity to be
produced of each selected commodity. Every
economy has limited resources and thus,
cannot produce all the goods. More of one
good or service usually means less of others.
The problem of ‘What to produce’ has two
aspects:
• What possible commodities to produce: An
economy has to decide, which consumer goods
(rice, wheat, clothes, etc.) and which of the
capital goods (machinery, equipment’s, etc.)
are to be produced.
• How much to produce: After deciding the
goods to be produced, economy has to
decide the quantity of each commodity that
is selected. It means, a decision regarding
the quantity to be produced, of consumer
and capital goods, civil and war goods and
so on.
•Guiding Principle of ‘What to
Produce':
•Allocate the resources in a manner
which gives maximum aggregate
satisfaction.
• In Labor intensive technique, more labor and less
capital (in the form of machines, etc.) is used.
• In Capital intensive technique, there is more
capital and less labor utilization.
2.How to Produce:
• This problem refers to selection of technique to be
used for production of goods and services.
• A good can be produced using different techniques
of production. By ‘technique’, we mean which
particular combination of inputs to be used.
Generally, techniques are classified as: Labor
intensive techniques (LIT) and Capital
intensive techniques (CIT).
3. For Whom to Produce:
•This problem refers to selection of the
category of people who will ultimately
consume the goods, i.e. whether to produce
goods for more-poor and less-rich or more-
rich and less-poor.
•Since resources are scarce in every economy,
no society can satisfy all the wants of its
people. Thus, a problem of choice arises.
The problem can be categorized under two main
heads:
• Personal Distribution: It means how national
income of an economy is distributed among
different groups of people.
• Functional Distribution: It involves deciding the
share of different factors of production in the total
national product of the country.
•Guiding Principle of ‘For whom to
Produce':
•Ensure that urgent wants of each
productive factor are fulfilled to the
maximum possible extent.
It should be also noted that in addition to
‘Allocation of Resources’, there are two more
Central Problems:
•Problem of fuller and efficient
utilization of resources and
•Problem of Growth of resources.
2.3.3. Major Problems of Micro and Small
Enterprises
Some of the major problems faced by micro and
small enterprises are as follows:
1. Problem of Raw Material
A major problem that the micro and small
enterprises have to contend with is the
procurement of raw material.
The problem of raw material has assumed the shape of:
(i) An absolute scarcity,
(ii) A poor quality of raw materials, and
(iii) A high cost
2. Problem of Finance:
The problem of finance in micro and small sector is mainly due to
two reasons.
• Firstly, it is partly due to scarcity of capital in the country as a
whole.
• Secondly, it is partly due to weak credit worthiness of micro and
small enterprises in the country.
3. Problem of Marketing:
• Their products compare unfavorably with the quality of the
products of the large-scale industries. Therefore, they suffer from
competitive disadvantages adversative to large-scale units.
4. Problem of Under-Utilization of Capacity:
• On an average, we can safely say that 50 to 40 per
cent of capacity were not utilized in micro and
small enterprises.
• The very integral to the problems of under-
utilization of capacity is power problem faced by
micro and small enterprises.
In short, there are two aspects to the problem:
• One, power supply is not always available to the
small units on the mere asking, and whenever it is
available, it rationed out, limited to a few hours in
a day.
Second, unlike large-scale industries, the micro and
small enterprises cannot afford to go in for
alternatives; like installing own thermal units,
because these involve heavy costs.
5. Other Problems:
In addition to the problems enumerated above, the
micro and small enterprises have been
constrained by a number of other problems also.
These include:
• Technological obsolescence,
• Inadequate and irregular supply of raw
materials,
• Lack of organized market channels,
•Imperfect knowledge of market conditions,
•Unorganized nature of operations,
•Inadequate availability of credit facility,
•Constraint of infrastructure facilities
including power, and
•Deficient managerial and technical skills.
There has been lack of effective co-ordination among the
various support organizations’ set up over the period for
the promotion and development of these industries.
Quality consciousness has not been generated to the
desired level despite various measures taken in this
regard.
Q Quiz (10%)