Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Efficient Market Hypothesis: MGT 521 Vivek Saxena Asst. Prof. LSB
Efficient Market Hypothesis: MGT 521 Vivek Saxena Asst. Prof. LSB
MGT 521
Vivek Saxena
Asst. Prof. LSB
What if ???
• Suppose investors had a model which could tell
them what stocks are on their way up
• They would reap in unending profits simply by
purchasing stocks that the model implied were
about to increase in price and then sell them
when the prices increased
• There is something inherently wrong with this
logic
• What would happen ?
• A model predicts with great confidence that a
stock currently at Rs.90 will rise in another 4 days
to Rs.100
• What would investors with access to the model do
today ?
• There would be a flurry of buy orders to cash in
on this prospective
• No one holding the stock would be willing to sell
• So price would start to go up
• And reach the target price of Rs.100 much earlier
• So the price will immediately reflects the good
news implicit in the model
• Forecast about favourable future performance
leads instead to favourable current performances
• Why ?
• Market participants try to cash in on the good
news – Price Jump
Random Walk
• What does this mean ?
• New information by its very definition is
unpredictable
• If it was predictable it would have been a part
of today’s information
• Thus stock prices change in response to new
information, so they move unpredictably
• Random Walk
• But if it was as simple as that, why are there so
many analysts in the market looking for stocks
which are under priced, so that they can sell
them at a profit
• This means that markets are not following
random walk
• Which means that markets are not efficient
• And this has led to various versions of the EMH
Random Walk
• Similarity between random numbers and stock
prices—Maurice Kendall 1953
• Liquid Particle movements and stock prices—
osborne’s brownion motion discovery
What is an efficient market?
• Is the one in which the market price of the
security is an unbiased estimate of its intrinsic
value
• It does not mean market prices are always the
intrinsic values but the deviations or the errors
are random
Versions of EMH
• Weak form hypothesis
• Semi strong form hypothesis
• Strong form hypothesis
Weak form hypothesis
• Stock prices already reflect all information
that can be derived by examining market
trading data
• History of past prices
• Trading Volume
• What does this mean ?
• Technical Analysis is useless
• We don’t know anything about fundamental
analysis….
Weak form hypothesis
• Past stock price data is publicly available and
virtually cost less to obtain
• All the information generated by technical
analysis has already been incorporated into
the price
• So a signal has lost its value
• Some of the best research firms in America
have been firing their technical analysts
Semi strong form hypothesis
• All publicly available information is reflected in the stock price
• So technical analysis is useless
• And so is fundamental analysis
• Every body has access to publicly available information
• And they have already traded on it
• So the information has already been incorporated into the
price of the security
• There are many well informed and well financed firms
conducting such research and in face of such competition it
will be difficult to uncover data not also available to other
analysts
• But this does not happen all the time
Strong Form Hypothesis
• Stock prices reflects all information relevant to
the firm even including information available
to the company insiders and private
information
• Not Possible
Empirical Test for weak form
hypothesis
1.Correlations Tests
2.Runs tests
Correlations Tests
• To check whether past price is influencing
present price
• Is the price change in one period correlated
with the price change in some other period?
• Studies conducted employing different stocks,
time periods and time lags
• No significant serial correlations or minor
positive correlations
Correlations Tests
Prices Prices Change Change
650 2507 15 -45.5
665 2461.5 0 -97.75
665 2363.75 20 -60.5
685 2303.25 0 -223
685 2080.25 20 -120
705 1960.25 3.5 190.75
708.5 2151 -1.5 -70.75
707 2080.25 2.5 172
709.5 2252.25 -2.5 30.5
707 2282.75 -0.5 -227.75
706.5 2055 11.75 -23.5
718.25 2031.5 -3.25 197.5
715 2229 -5 -105
710 2124 -5 -60.5
705 2063.5 -7 -68.5
698 1995 -7 115.75
691 2110.75 14 167.25
705 2278 1.25 3
706.25 2281 2.75 -71
709 2210 6 82
715 2292 Correlation -0.00634
Runs tests
• What is a run ?
• An uninterrupted sequence of one symbol
positive or negative
• ++++----++--+----+
Run test
1-Apr 881.5
2-Apr 856.5 -25
3-Apr 859.75 3.25
4-Apr 918.5 58.75
5-Apr 1010.25 91.75
8-Apr 1072.25 62
9-Apr 1074.5 2.25
10-Apr 1123.5 49
11-Apr 1203.5 80
12-Apr 1256.25 52.75
15-Apr 1341.5 85.25
16-Apr 1469.75 128.25
17-Apr 1450.25 -19.5
18-Apr 1306.5 -143.75
19-Apr 1258 -48.5
22-Apr 1332.75 74.75
23-Apr 1315.75 -17
24-Apr 1351 35.25
25-Apr 1407.5 56.5
26-Apr 1547.75 140.25
29-Apr 1521 -26.75
30-Apr 1484.25 -36.75
Run test
• No positive correlations between the change
in sign
• Supports random walk model strongly
Test for semi strong form hypothesis
Mental accounting
• Richard Thaller, a pioneer of Behavioral Economics, coined the
term 'mental accounting‘
• Defined as 'the inclination to categorize and treat money
differently depending on where it comes from, where it is
kept and how it is spent’
• Cinema Example
• Research in Behavioral Economics shows that gamblers who
lose their winnings typically feel they haven't lost anything.
• The fact though remains that they would have been richer
had they stopped playing while they had won enough.
Why investors lose money during a bull run