Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 - Project Selection I - V22
1 - Project Selection I - V22
1 - Project Selection I - V22
Chapter 8
Capital Budget
Lists the investments that a company plans to undertake
Capital Budgeting
Process used to analyze alternate investments and decide which ones to
accept
Incremental Earnings
The amount by which the firm’s earnings are expected to change as a result of
the investment decision
?
t
Initial Expected future cash flows
cash
outflows
NPV
t0 t1 t2 t3 tn
The NPV depends on the project’s initial investment, on expected cash flows and on
the cost of capital r (the TRIAD of an investment project)
Revenue and Cost Estimates
Example
Linksys has completed a $300,000 feasibility study to assess the
attractiveness of a new product, HomeNet. The project has an estimated
life of four years.
Revenue Estimates
Sales = 100,000 units/year
Per Unit Price = $260
Example
Cost Estimates
Up-Front R&D = $15,000,000
• (5KK Design&Engineering + 10KK software Development)
Up-Front New Equipment (CAPEX) = $7,500,000
• Expected life of the new equipment is 5 years; Housed in existing lab
Annual Overhead = $2,800,000
Per Unit (production) Cost = $110
The $7.5 million in new equipment is a cash expense, but it is not directly
listed as an expense when calculating earnings. Instead, the firm deducts a
fraction of the cost of these items each year as depreciation.
Straight Line Depreciation
• The asset’s cost is divided equally over its life.
Annual Depreciation = $7.5 million ÷ 5 years = $1.5 million/year
Opportunity Cost
The value a resource could have provided in its best alternative use
In the HomeNet project example, space will be required for the investment.
Even though the equipment will be housed in an existing lab, the
opportunity cost of not using the space in an alternative way (e.g.,
renting it out) must be considered.
Project Externalities
Indirect effects of the project that may affect the profits of other business
activities of the firm. Cannibalization is when sales of a new product
displaces sales of an existing product.
Project Externalities
In the HomeNet project example, 25% of sales come from customers
who would have purchased an existing Linksys wireless router if
HomeNet were not available. Because this reduction in sales of the
existing wireless router is a consequence of the decision to develop
HomeNet, we must include it when calculating HomeNet’s incremental
earnings.
Sunk costs are costs that have been or will be paid regardless of the decision
whether or not the investment is undertaken.
Sunk costs should not be included in the incremental earnings analysis.
Money that has already been spent on R&D is a sunk cost and
therefore irrelevant. The decision to continue or abandon a project
should be based only on the incremental costs and benefits of
the product going forward.
Typically
sales will change from year to year.
the average selling price will vary over time.
the average cost per unit will change over time.
The next 2 slides will show how to account for these effects
Sales Revenue
- Cost of goods sold (COGS)
- Other operational costs
EBITDA
- Depreciation
-----------------------
EBIT
- Taxes (EBIT * Tc)
------------------------------
= Unlevered Net Income or NOPAT
+ Depreciation
+/- Changes in Net Working Capital (NWC)
(-/+)Investments/Disinvestments in fixed capital (CAPEX)
-------------------------------
Operational Cash flow (OCF) of YEAR t
Constant-Growth Perpetuity
Tax Carryforwards/Carrybacks
• Tax loss carryforwards and carrybacks allow corporations to take
(current) losses during its current year and offset them against gains in
nearby years.
• In the USA
o firms can offset losses at t0 against income for the last 2 yrs
(getting a tax credit at t0); OR
o Save losses at t0 against income of the next 20 yrs (no taxes will be
paid in the future until the carryforwards are exhausted).
A practical rule :
Break-Even Analysis
• The break-even level of an input is the level that causes the NPV of the
investment to equal zero.
• HomeNet IRR Calculation
Break-Even Analysis
Break-Even Levels for HomeNet (that drive EBIT down to
zero)
Table 8.8 Break-Even Levels for HomeNet
Sensitivity Analysis shows how the NPV varies with a change in one of the
assumptions, holding the other assumptions constant.
Scenario Analysis
Problem
• Assume NRG originally forecasted its marketing and support costs at
$500,000 per year during years 1 – 3. Suppose the marking and support
costs could be as low as $200,000 or as high as $900,000 per year. How
would these changes impact the NPV of the proposed energy drink project?
Recall, NRG pays a 39% tax rate on its pre-tax income. Assume their cost
of capital is 9%.
Solution.
• We can answer the question by computing the NPV of the resulting free
cash flow, given the change in marketing and support costs.
Solution.
• A $300,000 decrease in marketing and support costs will increase NRG’s
EBIT by $300,000 and will, therefore increase NRG’s free cash flow by an
after-tax amount of:$300,000 x ( 1 – 0.39) = $183,000
• The present value of this increase is:
Solution.
• A $400,000 increase in marketing and support costs will decrease NRG’s
EBIT by $400,000 and will, therefore decrease NRG’s free cash flow by an
after-tax amount of:
$400,000 x ( 1 – 0.39) = $244,000
• The present value of this decrease is:
Delta NPV=2
PVo=3 Equity
Cash=1
Value Created for
Equity=10 Shareholders =
Equity=10 A+PVo-E = PVo-Io=NPV
Asset=9 Asset=9
In the real world, a specific project may have different market risk than the
average project for the firm.
In addition, different projects may vary in the amount of leverage they will
support.
Assume two firms are comparable to the plastics division and have
the following characteristics:
Assuming that both firms maintain a target leverage ratio, the unlevered
cost of capital for each competitor (rU) can be estimated by calculating their
pretax WACC.
A project’s equity cost of capital may differ from the firm’s equity cost of
capital if the project uses a target leverage ratio that is different than the
firm’s. The project’s equity cost of capital can be calculated as:
D
rE rU ( rU rD )
E
“Re(De)levering” of rE
rwacc rU d c rD
Now assume that Avco plans to maintain an equal mix of debt and equity
financing as it expands into plastics manufacturing, and it expects its
borrowing cost to be 6%.
Given the unlevered cost of capital estimate of 9.5%, the plastics division’s
equity cost of capital is estimated to be:
0.50
rE 9.5% (9.5% 6%) 13.0%
0.50
In other words, what is the change in the firm’s total debt (net of cash) with
the project versus without the project.
Problem
F5 Networks (FFIV) ended their fiscal year 2012 with approximately
$532 million in cash and securities and no debt. Consider a project with
an unlevered cost of capital of rU = 18%. Suppose F5 Networks’ payout
policy is completely fixed during the life of this project, so that the free cash
flow from the project will affect only F5 Networks’ cash balance.
Problem
If F5 Networks earns 1.1% interest on its cash holdings and pays a 36%
corporate tax rate, what cost of capital should F5 Networks use to
evaluate the project?
Solution
Because the inflows and outflows of the project change F5 Networks’ cash
balance, the project’s debt-to-value ratio is 100%; that is, d = 1. The
appropriate cost of capital for the project is
rwacc = rU - τcrD = 18% - 36% * 1.1% = 17.6%
• Note that the project is effectively 100% debt financed, because even
though F5 Networks itself had no debt, if the cash had not been used to
finance the project, F5 Networks would have had to pay taxes on the
interest the cash earned.