Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Class:-MBA FA-B Subject: - Fundamentals of Management Topic: - Functional Organisations
Class:-MBA FA-B Subject: - Fundamentals of Management Topic: - Functional Organisations
• The concept of Functional organization was suggested by F.W. Taylor who recommended the
appointment of specialists at important positions. For example, the functional head and Marketing
Director directs the subordinates throughout the organization in his particular area. This means that
subordinates receives orders from several specialists, managers working above them.
EXAMPLE OF FUNCTIONAL
ORGANIZATION
A functional organizational structure is perfect for medium and small business houses as
well as or companies that have either one or a few Products line. For example, a small
business entity AB Company deals in the manufacturing of and as nearly one hundred
employees.
It has adopted a functional organizational structure and has created department for finance,
marketing, sales, research, production, administration, and human resources.
All of them report directly to the head. When the company grows, it will start adding
further heads and top management officers, but at the beginning, it is a perfecT set-up for
functional organizational structure.
HOW DOES FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL
WORK?
In a functional organizational structure, the organization is
divided into smaller groups.
And division based on specialized function areas, such as
marketing or finance.
By dividing an organization into a variety of functional
structures, greater control can be exercised over operations
and how work is performed.
These functional areas operate in their own bubbles and are
disconnected from each other. Generally, the line of authority
from each function will flow to a senior executive or functional
head, such as the VP of marketing, and then to the CEO and the
board. A great example of this is Amazon’s Corporate Structure.
2. Increase in Efficiency:
There is a division of labour up to manager level. Planning and execution are also separated. This helps
increase the overall efficiency in the organisation. The workers get guidance from expert supervisors
Top executives are not unnecessarily burdened as happens in line organisation. The line officer is supposed to be
a jack of all trades and is burdened with all types of works. On the contrary a specialist is a master of his line and
he has the expertise and capability of taking his own decisions.
6. Economy of Operations:
The use of specialists helps in controlling the waste of materials, money and time. The consolidation of activities
leads to optimum use of facilities like office accommodation, plant and machinery, etc.
7. Better Supervision:
Every superior is an expert in his own area and he will be successful in making proper planning and execution.
The superiors, being well acquainted with the work, will be able to improve the level of supervision.
DISADVANTAGES OF
FUNCTIONAL
ORGANISATION:
1. Conflict in Authority:
The principle of ‘unity of command’ is violated in functional organisation. A subordinate is answerable to many
bosses. Every superior considers his work important and wants the workers to give top priority to his
assignment. The workers feel confused and are unable to decide about the priorities of their work.
2. Lack of Coordination:
The appointment of several specialists creates problems of coordination, especially when the advice of more
than one is needed for taking decisions. Specialists try to give more importance to their work as compared to
other areas. This creates conflicts among specialists and co-ordination becomes a problem.
Since there is no unity of command, it becomes difficult to fix responsibility for slackness in work. So many
persons are involved in completing a work and everybody tries to blame others for low performance.
4. Delay in Taking Decisions:
The involvement of more than one person in decision-making process slows the process down. The speed or action
tends to be hampered by the division of authority. Much time is taken in consulting different specialists prior to
decision-making.
5. Poor Discipline:
The division of authority creates problem of discipline. The workers have to obey many bosses, their loyalty
becomes divided. Discipline tends to break down not only among workers but also among lower level
supervisors.
6. Expensive:
Multiplicity of experts increases overhead expenses of the organisation. A number of specialists are appointed for
manning various lines of work. These persons being specialists demand much higher emoluments. Small units
cannot afford to have functional organisation.
SUITABILITY OF FUNCTIONAL ORGSNIZATION