Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welcome TO A Session ON Employee Productivity Through Motivation
Welcome TO A Session ON Employee Productivity Through Motivation
TO
A SESSION
ON
Esteem Need
Social Need
Safety and
Security
Physiological Need
Lower-order and higher-order
needs:
Maslow separated the five needs into
higher and lower order needs.
Physiological and safety needs were
described, as lower order needs. They
are similar to primary needs. Social,
esteem and self-actualization as
higher order needs. Higher order
needs are satisfied internally and the
lower order needs are satisfied
externally.
Interpretation of the hierarchy of
needs:
The concept of hierarchy of needs
has two consequences. Firstly, unless
and until a lower need is satisfied,
higher order needs do not motivate.
In other words, as the lower order
needs are reasonably satisfied, a
person places more emphasis on the
higher order needs. Higher needs
emerge as lower needs -are fulfilled
or satisfied. Secondly, once a need is
satisfied, it no longer motivates. A
fully satisfied need would not be a
strong motivator.
E-R-G theory
Clayton Alderfer has proposed an
alternative hierarchy of needs called the
ERG theory of motivation. The letters E, R,
and G stand for Existence, Relatedness and
Growth. He suggests that people's needs
can be grouped into three levels, not five
levels. Existence needs are essential for
basic human existence and these arc
similar to Maslow's physiological and
security needs. Relatedness needs,
involving the need to relate to others, are
similar to the Maslow" belongings and
esteem needs. Finally, growth needs are
equivalent to Maslow's needs for self
esteem an actualization.
Motivation-Hygiene Theory
Fredrick Herzberg, a social
psychologist, proposed the
motivation-hygiene theory based on
satisfaction. He extended the work
of Maslow and developed a specific
content theory of work motivation.
His theory played a major role in
managerial motivation. He found that
one set of job and personal factors
produced good feelings and that
another created bad feelings. He
found that entirely two different
sets of factors were associated with
the two kinds of feelings about work.
One set of factors, Herzberg called
hygiene factors. These factors are
associated with job context. The hygiene
factors include salary, job security,
personal life, working condition, status,
interpersonal relations, and technical
supervision and company policies. These
factors do not give positive satisfaction
but their absence will cause
dissatisfaction, and they cannot motivate
an employee. These factors are essential to
avoiding or preventing job dissatisfaction
but do not lead to satisfaction. When they
are adequate, people will not be
dissatisfied: however, neither-will they be
satisfied.
Herzberg described the second set
of factors as motivating factors.
They include achievement,
recognition, autonomy, challenging
work advancement and growth in the
job. Three factors are associated
with job content. Their existence will
produce feelings of satisfaction or no
satisfaction. These arc intrinsic
factors.
Equity Theory
Employees work in a social system in which
they observe one another, judge one
another and make comparisons. They want
their rewards system to be fair.
The Equity theory refers to a person's
subjective judgment about the fairness of
receiving reward, relative to the inputs, in
comparison with the rewards of others. . It
is based on a persons perception what he is
giving and receiving versus what the other
person is giving and receiving. Greater the
fairness perceived, higher the motivation
and vice versa
McClelland's Needs Theory of
Motivation
David McClelland has identified the
following three basic needs or drives
within an individual:
Needs for achievement:
People who think about how they can improve on
their work, who wonder how they might accomplish
something that is valuable, and who derive great
satisfaction from striving to do good work arc
considered to have a high need for achievement.
McClelland conducted studies and indicated strong
positive relationship between high need Jim
achievement and high level of job performance and
executive success. Me offered the following
reasons why people feel strong need for
achievement:
Need for affiliation:
People who think about developing
warm, friendly, personal relationships
with others in the organization are
considered to have a high need for
affiliation. They have a high need for
affiliation and usually are more
sensitive to other's feelings.
Personnel employees, teachers,
nurses, counselors and many
government employees typically have
high need for affiliation.
Need for power:
People who think about the influence
and control they have over others and
how they can use this influence to
change people's behavior, gain
authority and status and dominate
decisions are considered to have a
high need for power. Their needs are
satisfied by manipulating and
controlling others. Research studies
indicate that top managers and
especially organizational presidents
are highly motivated by the need for
power.
The Guidelines of Effective Motivation
There are a number of motivation theories.
It is difficult and even dangerous to
synthesize a large number of complex ideas
into a few simple guidelines. The following
suggestions are offered with the hope of
motivating employees in the organizations.
Employees have different needs. Do not
assume that all people are motivated by
same needs. Spend the time necessary to
understand what is important to each
employee.
Do not treat them al alike. People are
different physically and more importantly
psychologically.
Make you employees feel important. Human
beings want to be appreciated and like to
feel important.
Allow employees to participate in decisions
that affect them. This can increase
employee productivity, commitment to work
goals, motivation and job satisfaction.
Guide rather than order. Set a good
example. The manager set the style for his
people.
Subordinates are always watching their
boss. Be a person worth coping..
Rewards should be contingent on
performance.
Money as a motivator: the debate
There is a controversy whether
money is a motivator or not. Critics
arc divided on this issue. Many people
argue that the traditional carrot and
stick method of motivation still works
today. The carrot has been money and
the slick has been taken in the form
of physical, financial or social
punishment. Money is important to
employees for a number of reasons.
Money is reward for accomplishment
and is a means of giving people
pleasure from accomplishment.
a) Money is more important to people
that meet their monetary needs. Money is
urgent means of achieving a minimum
standard of living, purchasing of goods and,
services. So money has the economic value
of the people. Others thing may never do
that.
b) It is quite true that in most kinds of
organizations, money is used as a means of
attracting and holding qualified people. This is why
organizations make their wages and salaries
competitive within their industry. Organizations
often take greater care to ensure that people on
comparable jobs arc given the same compensation
because people usually evaluate their compensation
in light of what their equals are receiving.
c) The money must be received as directly
related to the required extra performance
and must be received immediately upon
completion.
d) It is almost certainly true that money can
motivate only when prospective payment is large
relative to a person's income. But employees
differ in the amount of money they want. For
example, an extra taka ten thousand may not be
motivating to an executive who earns taka two lakh
annually. This is why; pay increases or bonus should
be large enough to motivate the receiver. The
annual pay increases in Bangladeshi firms is so low
that .it seldom motivates the receiver. They may
keep the employees from being dissatisfied and
from looking for another job.
After all there are many non-
financial incentives such as:
Employee satisfaction
Morale motivation
Interpersonal relationships
Effective supervision
Group dynamics might increase
productivity.
Importance of different incentives in
motivating industrial managers in
Bangladesh.
The study was designed to investigate the
relative importance of different incentives
for motivation, as perceived by different
levels of industrial managers (top and
bottom level managers). The sample of the
study comprised of 90 managerial
employees from four different
organizations located in Dhaka city. The
sample of the study was selected on
random sampling basis. The results of the
study indicate that all incentives are not
equally important in motivating managers
and it also varies with the variation of the
levels of managers.
Job security, autonomy in work,
promotional opportunity, participation
in decision-making are more important
to top-level managers. While the
bottom level managers have
considered application of sound
management principles, training and
open communication as more
important incentives to their
motivation at work. Both the groups
have however, rated wage as a
relatively less important incentive for
their motivation
They have ranked the motivational
factors in the following way:
Job security
Justice and equity
Promotional opportunity
Recognition and reward for good
work
Autonomy in work
Participation in decision-making
Wages
Application of sound
Management principles
Removal of hindrances
Feedback
Open communication
Good relation with co-workers
Training facilities
Encouragement for good work
Competition (among the
colleagues)
Finally,according to the article there
are good numbers of incentives to
motivate the managers working in
industry but all these are not equally
important. Some incentives are
relatively more important then the
others and it also varies with the
levels of management. The study
reveals some interesting facts of-our
industrial life. Altitudes of our
manager about wage, job security and
autonomy in work are few of them.
THANKS
FOR
ATTENDING THE SESSION