Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Designing Effective Compensation System Systems For Sales Professionals
Designing Effective Compensation System Systems For Sales Professionals
Designing Effective Compensation System Systems For Sales Professionals
Cash
Designing Effective
Recognit
Compensation System Systems
3Ps for Sales Professionals
ion
Sales
Comp Philosophy, Concept & Case Study
Mix
Experien
WLB
ce
Knowled
ge
BIMA HERMASTHO, Dr
Chairman InsTRap
+628122862849
Ig/fb @bimahermastho
APTRI (InSTRaP)
Asosiasi Profesional Total Rewards Indonesia
Indonesian Society for Total Rewards Professional (InSTRaP)
Vision
Knowledge Center for Total Rewards solutions that able to Enhance Employee Prosperity and Business Sustainability
Mission
Developing, update and adopt compelling and powerful total rewards solutions to elevate employee satisfaction and
improving organization productivity
Value
Dynamic, Universalistic, Integration and Teamwork
To achieve this :
• Attract and retain the best people
• Motivate all reps to achieve higher performance, while maintaining
highest ethical behaviour
• Develop culture based on results
SALES COMPENSATION
Four Key Components
Rp Above
average Top 25%
overall
To p 20%
Mix of variable vs. salary should be in line with local market practices
40% Salary
70%
90%
60% Variable
30%
10%
Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3
Ensure Co is at the Ensure Co is in top Caution over increasing
leading edge in terms 20% on variable variable pay, remain
of variable pay pay within local peer group
(1) Average compensation split of competitors
(2) Top performers typically defined as top 10% of Sales person
1 Compensation Guidelines
COMPENSATION
Summary of Key
Guidelines
1 Compensation guidelines
Total average sales compensation should be top quartile (25%) relative to national
competition
Variable component of pay should, in general, be top quintile (20%) relative to national
competition
Variable pay should be set at levels which encourage sales effort, but do not provide
excessive reward which might lead to unethical behaviour
(1) Top rep performers typically defined as top 10% of sales person
2 Incentive scheme design
SALES COMPENSATION
Four Key Components
% input to bonus
(1) Key performance metrics and targets should be aligned between incentives and rep performance management
2 Incentive scheme design
No. of
Sales Bottom Average To p
person quartile quartiles quartile
Motivate reps at
Do not reward most levels of
poor performance to
performance improve
Performance
(sales and
other factors)
Top sales
Expect bottom schemes to
Expect 75-85% of all reps to receive cash
15-25% of reps to encourage
bonuses
be paid no bonus excellence
2 Incentive scheme design
INCENTIVES
Summary of Key
Guidelines
(1) Key performance metrics and targets should be aligned between incentive scheme and rep performance management
3 Payout guidelines
SALES COMPENSATION
Four Key Components
(1) Products are typically classified as "new" for up to 2 years after launch, however, this depends on local market conditions and product type
3 Payout guidelines
INCENTIVES
Summary of Key
Guidelines
3 Payout guidelines
When shared targets are set, bonuses should be paid as fixed amounts rather than as
percentage of base salary
Payout should start at 75–85% of target achieved for new products and ~95% for mature
products(1)
Payout rates should be capped beyond 140–150% of target achieved for new products and
120–130% for mature products(1)
Payouts can occur every cycle, but should be limited to 75% of bonus earned until year end
(1) Products are typically classified as "new" for up to 2 years after launch, however this depends on local market conditions and product type
4 Portfolio alignment
COMPENSATION
Four Key Components
Payouts for new and mature products(1) Payouts for 1st, 2nd and 3rd line details
(both 1st detail) (assuming all are mature products)
Bonus (Rp)
Bonus (Rp)
New(1)
1st detail 60% 1st line
Bonus for 2nd detail
line detail
Payout should product
be the same for should
100% of target be less than 1st
Mature 30% 2nd line
line product
1st detail detail
Typical
3 line
rd bonus
10% weighting
detail
s
for 3 detail
60 100 120 140 (60:30:10)
calls
60 100 125
Sales (%) Sales (%)
(1) Products are typically classified as "new" for up to 2 years after launch. However, this depends on local market conditions and product type
4 Portfolio alignment
Min
Min Separate
level Min
level sales levels
80% level
75% reflecting
70%
portfolio
strategy
INCENTIVES
Summary of Key
Guidelines
4 Portfolio alignment
Payout for 2nd or 3rd details should always be lower than for 1st detail products
Payout of full bonus should be dependent on achieving minimum sales levels for all
key products detailed by the rep
(1) Products are typically classified as "new" for up to 2 years after launch, however this depends on local market conditions and product type
SALES COMPENSATION
Summary of Key Guidelines:
Q&A
Compensation Incentive Payout Portfolio
1 guidelines
2 scheme
3 guidelines
4 alignment
design
Total average rep All reps should fully When shared targets are Rewards should be
compensation should be understand their incentives set, bonuses should be paid weighted according to
top quartile (25%) relative scheme as fixed amounts rather portfolio prioritisation
to national competition than as percentage of base
80-100% of rewards should salary Payout for 2nd or 3rd details
Variable component of pay be determined by sales should always be lower
should, in general, be top achieved(2) Payout should start at 75– than for 1st detail products
quintile (20%) relative to 85% of target achieved for
national competition Schemes should be new products and ~95% for New products should
designed so that 75-85% of typically be allocated
mature products(3)
Variable pay should be set reps are expected to
greater proportion of bonus
at levels which encourage receive a cash bonus Payout rates should be pool(3)
sales effort, but do not capped beyond 140–150%
provide excessive reward Targets should sum at all
of target achieved for new Payout of full bonus should
which might lead to levels, including nationally
products and 120–130% for be dependent on achieving
unethical behaviour
Top performer schemes mature products(3) minimum sales levels for
should be established with all key products detailed by
Compensation for top sales
focus on "recognition"of Payouts can occur every the sales person
performers(1) should be cycle, but should be limited
top 10% (or less) of reps
particularly competitive to to 75% of bonus earned
aid retention
until year end
(1) Top rep performers typically defined as top 10% of sales reps
(2) Key performance metrics and targets should be aligned between incentive scheme and rep performance management
(3) Products are typically classified as "new" for up to 2 years after launch, however this depends on local market conditions and product type