XVII International Forum-Contest of Students and

Saint-Petersburg Mining Young Researchers “Topical Issues of Rational Use of
University Natural Resources”

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR

PREDICTING THE STRESS-STRAIN STATE OF
SHAFT LINING IN SALT ROCKS WITH
CONSIDERING THE TIME-DEPENDENT
BEHAVIOUR SPEAKER : I. A. OTKUPSCHIKOVA
SCIENTIFIC SUPERVISOR : N. A. BELYAKOV

Saint-Petersburg, 2021
RELEVANCE OF THE STUDY

2
Elastic modulus time dependent function:
(3.1)
- elastic modulus
Total parameter values
, - approximation coefficients
E0, GPa α δ
Dataset for the time-dependent elastic model 18 0.92 1.85
E, Pa v t, h
18000000000 0.2 0
1091380023 0.2 0.01
1034604713 0.2 0.02
963802124.4 0.2 0.05
929281997.4 0.2 0.08
… … …

MODEL OF A LINEAR
HEREDITARY ENVIRONMENT 3
 ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY
Creep time dependent function:
ε‧103 Experimental Data
(4.1) 60

– shear strains 50

– shear stresses, MPa 40

– approximation coefficients 30

that are constants for fixed time points 20

10
For uniaxial compressive stress tests
0
(4.2) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
t, h

Capturing moments in time

4
 Algorithm for determining rheological properties
Plotting a graph (5.1) Curve approximation
Linear function approximation (5.2)
m(t)
ln(σ1i) 0.35
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.3
-3
0.25
f(x) = 0.0321410635534194 ln(x) + 0.0474721447117263
-3.5 f(x)
f(x)===1.2654832575921
f(x) 1.28762318240479x x−x −6.97367162816122
1.27447676236803 7.0006809856046
−6.89715168563895
7.01030999928617 0.2
f(x)
f(x)==1.21261112227819
1.192886130386 x x− −6.92546945317115
0.15
-4
ln(ε1i)

0.1
-4.5 0.05
-5 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
-0.05
-5.5 157.313 Linear (157.313) 308.335

-6
Linear (308.335) 407.426 Linear (407.426) B(t)
549.97 Linear (549.97) 623.626
Linear (623.626) 0.0021
Recalculating parameters 0.00205
0.002
t, h k b B m 0.00195
157.313 1.1929 -6.9255 0.00196 0.1929 0.0019
308.335 1.2745 -7.0103 0.00181 0.2745 0.00185
407.426 1.2126 -6.8972 0.00202 0.2126 0.0018
549.97 1.2655 -6.9737 0.00187 0.2655 0.00175
623.626 1.2876 -7.0007 0.00182 0.2876 0.0017
691.453 1.3064 -7.0204 0.00179 0.3064
0.00165
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
5
 CALCULATING THE SHAFT LINING LOAD USING NUMERICAL AND
GRAPHICAL METHODS

Equation for calculating the shaft lining load Eqaution for practical calculations of the thickness of a
single-layer lining with taking into account the non-uniform
distribution of the lining load
(6.1)

(6.2)

6
METHODOLOGY OF USING THE CREEP MODE OF
THE DRUCKER PRAGER PLASTICITY MODEL
The original power law form with explicit
time dependence
(7.1)
- plastic strain rate
– deviatoric stress, MPa
– time, h
- coefficients for units conversion
– material properties
Integrated power law form
(7.2)

7
 DETERMINATION OF SALT ROCK STRENGTH AND
HARDENING PROPERTIES
Pressure stress (8.1)
Determination of compression harden-
Deviatoric stress (8.2) 30
ing properties
25
80.00
Determination of strength properties
f(x) = 1.16913518965914 x + 9.74489208392784 20
70.00 15

60.00 10
5
50.00
P, MPa

0
40.00 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

30.00 Deformation diagram Elastic deformation

20.00 Dataset for the model

𝛽=𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑡𝑔(𝑘)=49°
εpl σ, Pa
10.00
0 11037800
3.3E-05 11370800
0.00 6.71E-05 11689200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0.000102 12000100
0.000137 12303700
q, MPa … …
8
 Methodology of using the Double Power law creep model
Modified Norton creep law with explicit time
dependence
(9.1)
- plastic strain rate
– deviatoric stress, MPa
– time, h
- coefficients for units conversion
– material properties

Double Power model Dataset

A1 B1 C1 A2 B2 C2
3.06E-17 -51.75 2 0.000809 1.834 -9.314

9
 Results of a virtual experiments for the Double Power law creep model
0.06

0.05

0.04
Strains

0.03

0.02

0.01

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Time, h
2 MPa 8 MPa 12 MPa Results 16 MPa
Experimental curve 16 MPa

Comparison of experimental data and numerical simulations

Modelling of uniaxial testing of salt rock samples
data

10
Finite-element method model of the mine shaft cross-section

Properties of the tubing lining

Layer Radius, m E, MPa ν R, МПа Cast iron

Inner tubing ribs 3.7 61200 0.3

Tubing back 3.82 180000 0.3 566.67 ВЧ 100
External tubing ribs 3.9 98584.62 0.3
11
 Results comparison
Maximum principal stresses in the lining elements in 10 years
Layer Linear Comparison of the growth of stresses in the support with
DPL Real Data
Inherited time
Inner tubing
247.044 788.188 238.221 900
ribs 800
Tubing back 244 367 180 700
External tubing 600
242.858 356.07 124.168

Stress, MPa
ribs 500
400
300
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time, y

Double Power Model Linear Inherited Model

12
FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC WORK

It is planned in future:
• to use a creep model based on the Empirical Power Law
• to perform the modelling in 3D with taking into account the geometry of
individual tubes
• to use the Drucker-Prager plasticity model with the Creep mode
• to take into account physical non-linearity of salt rocks plastic behaviour

13
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION