Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IBH - Module - 1 Summary - Sec A
IBH - Module - 1 Summary - Sec A
IBH - Module - 1 Summary - Sec A
Module 1 Summary
Prof. Dr. Shubhabrata Basu
Integrated Programme in Management
IIM Indore
π (notional) = SP/Rev (notional) – CP (real)
π (notional) = SP/Rev (notional) – CP (real)
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
If Nature Balances → Man be substituted,
Labour Markets should clear, Man vs. M/C Let man be free Axiomatic Truths: Man can think independently, Left to himself he
Laissez Faire can do more benefit to himself & society, Nature is Harmonious.
No Restriction on Movement, Migration to
Colonies as Indentured Labour, a new
breed of rag2riches Industrialists born,
Some Munificent Conditions helped
π (notional) = SP/Rev (notional) – CP (real) King, State, Guilds, Individual Traders/ Industrialists
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
If Nature Balances → Man be substituted,
Labour Markets should clear, Man vs. M/C Let man be free Axiomatic Truths: Man can think independently, Left to himself he
Laissez Faire can do more benefit to himself & society, Nature is Harmonious.
No Restriction on Movement, Migration to
Colonies as Indentured Labour, a new 5 TTs and 4 Waves: Colony expansion → trade expansion → demand increase → supply
breed of rag2riches Industrialists born, side constraints → from labour to automation → cotton → railroad → iron/steel &
Some Munificent Conditions helped petroleum, automobile, chemical & pharma, electrical & electronics → network centric world
π (notional) = SP/Rev (notional) – CP (real) King, State, Guilds, Individual Traders/ Industrialists
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
If Nature Balances → Man be substituted,
Labour Markets should clear, Man vs. M/C Let man be free Axiomatic Truths: Man can think independently, Left to himself he
Laissez Faire can do more benefit to himself & society, Nature is Harmonious.
No Restriction on Movement, Migration to
Colonies as Indentured Labour, a new 5 TTs and 4 Waves: Colony expansion → trade expansion → demand increase → supply
breed of rag2riches Industrialists born, side constraints → from labour to automation → cotton → railroad → iron/steel &
Some Munificent Conditions helped petroleum, automobile, chemical & pharma, electrical & electronics → network centric world
Characteristics: Time saving, labour extending/stretching/multi-skilling, resource extending, capital increasing, energy conserving
Reasons for fast adoption: Technology diffusion, all users, no novelty, no source of competitive advantages, Darwinian Evolution
Success Factors: Existing base of supporting industry, large scale mechanization, easy scientific laws.
Problem: Slowing rate of Innovation, no radically new scientific discoveries, boundaries w.r.t. FOP getting blurred.
π (notional) = SP/Rev (notional) – CP (real) King, State, Guilds, Individual Traders/ Industrialists
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
If Nature Balances → Man be substituted,
Labour Markets should clear, Man vs. M/C Let man be free Axiomatic Truths: Man can think independently, Left to himself he
Laissez Faire can do more benefit to himself & society, Nature is Harmonious.
No Restriction on Movement, Migration to
Colonies as Indentured Labour, a new 5 TTs and 4 Waves: Colony expansion → trade expansion → demand increase → supply
breed of rag2riches Industrialists born, side constraints → from labour to automation → cotton → railroad → iron/steel &
Some Munificent Conditions helped petroleum, automobile, chemical & pharma, electrical & electronics → network centric world
Characteristics: Time saving, labour extending/stretching/multi-skilling, resource extending, capital increasing, energy conserving
Reasons for fast adoption: Technology diffusion, all users, no novelty, no source of competitive advantages, Darwinian Evolution
Success Factors: Existing base of supporting industry, large scale mechanization, easy scientific laws.
Problem: Slowing rate of Innovation, no radically new scientific discoveries, boundaries w.r.t. FOP getting blurred.
happened to •
•
There are more white collared Jobs than blue
The “air” of Pittsburgh is purer than any average
US city of similar size…
Carnegie Steel
Oil Industry – Advantage Petroleum
• Petroleum – Rock Oil/Asphalt/Bitumen was used as a sealant in baths and boats, mortar
additive, ingredient of “Greek Fire”, ingredient in Greek and Indian medicines (as laxative)
etc.
• Its use as fuel was a modern invention
• Petroleum has higher calorific value vis-à-vis coal/charcoal
• Substitution effect in Transportation Industry
• More cargo space for the same dead weight of ship/train
• Higher endurance and Greater Range
• Relatively Cleaner Fuel (less smoke)
• Less Labour Intensive
• More Byproducts => more money per ton of rock oil
• LONGER upstream and downstream => More value additions in intermediate steps
OIL & GAS Value Chain
Importance of Standard Oil
• Rockefeller was an incremental innovator
• Novel profit = where p=first intervention batch, n=last designed batch (for a given year) and incr =
incremental improvement => incremental cost savings over large numbers
• incr => each part MUST be identical => STANDARDIZATION
• Larger the numbers => more the profit
• Larger numbers via horizontal integration => M&A
• Industry Consolidation => monopoly status
• Benign monopoly (lower price of goods) vs State Monopoly (PSU – higher costs due to capital &
labor inefficiencies)
• Ended up controlling 90% of US petroleum market and 80% of global trade in oil
• “The growth of a large business is merely a survival of the fittest”
• First man to really wield MONEY power – bargain with FED for rates
• Political Backlash – anti monopoly case – Standard Oil broken up
• Founded Chicago University, Rockefeller University and Central Philippine Univ
Why Philanthropists…
• Both Andrew Carnegie and Rockefeller donated HEAVILY in education
• Both were R2R stories – semi-self educated entrepreneurs who were penalized for
NOT knowing the “other aspects of business – problem of Social Costs – e.g.
Transaction Costs”
• Focused only in managing Production Costs => social fallouts
• Devoted and donated their money in ENABLING OTHERS to learn from their
limitations
• That’s Philanthropy…
• Contrast this with a modern day investor – who siphoned out his fortune from
software industry to invest in medical research…
Auto Industry
The Automobile Industry…
• Fallacy of Transportation - From Cargo and Business Transportation Perspective, it is
“Time and Cost” ECONOMIC to travel
• Shorter Distance by Road
• Medium Distance by Rail
• Longer Distance by Ships
• Short – Medium – Long is Regional Context Specific – e.g. 500 miles (800KM) in US is
motorable – but in the domain of trains in UK
• Given the Demand for Long Economic Drives, US cars must have 3 properties
• Sturdier – More/heavier structural elements
• Bigger – heavier structural elements => bigger Engine => Bigger Fuel capacity
• More Reliable – wont break down in the middle of NOWHERE => Standardization
Impact of Geographical Spread on Oil
Industry
Sturdier Sturdier
WWII Losers
Bigger Smaller
WWII Victors
Unique to
GMC
Unique to Opel
Advantages of Multi-brand Strategy
• The GM Multi-Brand Strategy
• Managed Cadillac ↔ Buick ↔ GMC ↔ Opel ↔ Chevrolet
• Each BRAND – in reality ACQUIRED companies – is only SLIGHTLY
different in Premiumness than its contiguous brand
• Thus, Opel and Chevrolet are slightly different in perceived
differentiation, but Cadillac and Chevrolet is significantly different
• Consumers would consider Chevy to be Cost Leader while Cadillac
as clear Differentiator
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
If Nature Balances → Man be substituted,
Labour Markets should clear, Man vs. M/C Let man be free Axiomatic Truths: Man can think independently, Left to himself he
Laissez Faire can do more benefit to himself & society, Nature is Harmonious.
No Restriction on Movement, Migration to
Colonies as Indentured Labour, a new 5 TTs and 4 Waves: Colony expansion → trade expansion → demand increase → supply
breed of rag2riches Industrialists born, side constraints → from labour to automation → cotton → railroad → iron/steel &
Some Munificent Conditions helped petroleum, automobile, chemical & pharma, electrical & electronics → network centric world
Characteristics: Time saving, labour extending/stretching/multi-skilling, resource extending, capital increasing, energy conserving
Reasons for fast adoption: Technology diffusion, all users, no novelty, no source of competitive advantages, Darwinian Evolution
Success Factors: Existing base of supporting industry, large scale mechanization, easy scientific laws.
Problem: Slowing rate of Innovation, no radically new scientific discoveries, boundaries w.r.t. FOP getting blurred.
Railroad: Tool for connectivity, Steel Industry: Technology Oil Industry: Efficiency led industry Auto Industry: Work Flow,
Expansion, Infrastructural Demand, led innovations, Growth from consolidation, Standardization, Granularization, Time & motion,
Land Acquisition, Spinoff Business, War Economy, Scale Innovative Products, Industrial synchronization, standardization,
Employment, Experiment with Economies, Work hours, TU Goons, Business – alternative scale & scope economies, low
Mgmt. Styles, Dev. of Capital unrest, selling business for power centre, political backlash, cost mass market, rigidity, lack of
Markets & statistical tools, Time & profits, Philanthropic Spinoff monopoly Anti-trust, Business flexibility & innovation, efficient
motion study, Standardization, of business research centres break up, TU violence, labour market, Implicit Duopoly,
Politics-Business Nexus, Ethical to Universities Philanthropy, Creation of Assembly line vs. multi-brand
Dilemmas Universities approach.
π (notional) = SP/Rev (notional) – CP (real) King, State, Guilds, Individual Traders/ Industrialists
Cognitive
own ships (navy), Wage cuts, Export Subsidies, Non-Tariff
Process
Exploit domestic resources Barriers
Adam Smith: Theory of Moral Sentiments – How Emotions are
Rich & Poor Divide↑, King Wasted Money on fruitless Wars Generated – See → Evaluate → Benchmark against beliefs and
Biases → cost-benefit tradeoffs → Societal Reaction → Decide
If Nature Balances → Man be substituted,
Labour Markets should clear, Man vs. M/C Let man be free Axiomatic Truths: Man can think independently, Left to himself he
Laissez Faire can do more benefit to himself & society, Nature is Harmonious.
No Restriction on Movement, Migration to
Colonies as Indentured Labour, a new 5 TTs and 4 Waves: Colony expansion → trade expansion → demand increase → supply
breed of rag2riches Industrialists born, side constraints → from labour to automation → cotton → railroad → iron/steel &
Some Munificent Conditions helped petroleum, automobile, chemical & pharma, electrical & electronics → network centric world
Characteristics: Time saving, labour extending/stretching/multi-skilling, resource extending, capital increasing, energy conserving
Reasons for fast adoption: Technology diffusion, all users, no novelty, no source of competitive advantages, Darwinian Evolution
Success Factors: Existing base of supporting industry, large scale mechanization, easy scientific laws.
Problem: Slowing rate of Innovation, no radically new scientific discoveries, boundaries w.r.t. FOP getting blurred.
Railroad: Tool for connectivity, Steel Industry: Technology Oil Industry: Efficiency led industry Auto Industry: Work Flow, Food Industry: Free knowledge
Expansion, Infrastructural Demand, led innovations, Growth from consolidation, Standardization, Granularization, Time & motion, from assembly line, efficiency,
Land Acquisition, Spinoff Business, War Economy, Scale Innovative Products, Industrial synchronization, standardization, rigidity & flexibility, consistency,
Employment, Experiment with Economies, Work hours, TU Goons, Business – alternative scale & scope economies, low modular innovation, brand loyalty
Mgmt. Styles, Dev. of Capital unrest, selling business for power centre, political backlash, cost mass market, rigidity, lack of and resilience, tradeoffs (burger
Markets & statistical tools, Time & profits, Philanthropic Spinoff monopoly Anti-trust, Business flexibility & innovation, efficient vs. pizza, limited product line),
motion study, Standardization, of business research centres break up, TU violence, labour market, Implicit Duopoly, Franchise model of growth – high
Politics-Business Nexus, Ethical to Universities Philanthropy, Creation of Assembly line vs. multi-brand authority, high profit, low
Dilemmas Universities approach. ownership, SKD delivery model
Financial Meltdown in Capitalism
• Assumption: Entrepreneur/Agent (manager) can
– Assess Risk Correctly
– Convert Risk to Reward
– Investor Benefits from Profits
• 150 years Capital Market Success
– Norm: Risk → Reward → π
– Bred Complacency
Universe is a Huge Self
• Remember Correcting Entity!
• Recovery is round the corner
Any Questions/Doubts!
Questions from My Side – Sec-A
• How would you link (relate) (i.e. Identify the common threads in) the
evolution of American Business/Corporation from the Economic Principles
of Adam Smith to the rise of the Monopoly Businesses of Rockefeller,
Carnegie, Vanderbilt etc.
• How will you convert the rigidity of a scale problems to a scope advantage
(meaning the Model T limitations to Sloan’s Multi-brand GM Story)?
• From amongst Ford, Carnegie Steel (US Steel), Standard Oil, New York &
Harlem Railroads – who can be a precursor (w.r.t. Business Philosophy) to
Lehman Brothers and Why?