Purple and Black Simple Technology Keynote Presentation

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Muhammad Arslan Sadiq

BSENG-18-09
Total Physical Response-TPR
Definition:

Total Physical Response (TPR) is a


language teaching method built
around the coordination of speech
and action; it attempts to teach
language through physical (motor)
activity.
Background:

• Developed by James Asher, a professor of psychology


at San Jose State University, California.
• Draws on several traditions, including developmental
psychology, learning theory, and humanistic pedagogy,
as well as on language teaching procedures proposed by
Harold and Dorothy Palmer in 1925.
Total Physical Response is linked to the "trace
theory" of memory in psychology (e.g., Katona
1940), which holds that the more often or the
more intensively a memory connection is
traced, the stronger the memory association will
be and the more likely it will be recalled
Comprehension Approach (Winitz
1981)
Basically, it says that comprehension is much important before
learning to speak a language, or relate the language words to any
movement or action. Gouin had advocated a situationally based
teaching strategy in which a chain of action verbs served as the
basis for introducing and practicing new language items. Palmer
experimented with an action-based teachIng strategy in his book
"English Through Actions"
Theory of Language:
• Asher states that " most of the grammatical structure of the target
language and hundreds of vocabulary items can be learned from the
skillful use of the imperative by the instructor"
e.g. SIT, STAND
• He believes that lea rners can acquire a " detailed cognitive map" as well
as :'the grammatical structure of a language" without recourse to
abstractions.
• Asher does not elaborate on the rel ation between comprehension
production, and communication
Theory of Learning:
• Asher's language learning theories are
reminiscent of the views of other behavioral
psychologists.
• SV-R: Sv refers to a verbal stimulus- a syllable, a
word, a phrase, and so on, R refers to the physical
movements the child makes in response to verbal
stimulus (SV)
Asher's view of child language acquisition:

BRAIN REDUCTION OF
BIO-PROGRAM LATERALIZATI STRESS
There exists a specific innate N defines
Brain lateralization Stress (an affective filter)
bio-program for language different learning functions In intervenes between the act of
learning, which defines an the left- and right-brain learning and what is to be
optimal path for first and second hemispheres. learned; the lower the stress, the
language development. greater the learning.
"Natural Method"
DESIGN:
• Objectives
• The Syllabus
The general objectives of Total Physical Response are
to teach oral proficiency at a beginning level.
Comprehension is a means to an end, and the ultimate
aim is to teach basic speaking skills. A TPR course
aims to produce learners who are capable of an
uninhibited communication that is intelligible to a
native speaker.
• The type of syllabus Asher uses can be inferred
from an analysis of the exercise types employed in
TPR classes. This analysis reveals the use of a
sentence-based syllabus, with grammatical and
lexical criteria being primary in selecting teaching
items.
• Total Physical Response requires inititial attention
to meaning rather than to the form of items.
Grammar is thus taught inductively.
• A course designed around Total Physical Response
principles, however, wou ld not be expected to
follow a TPR syllabus exclusively. (Not limited to a
defined extent)
Types of learning and teaching activities:

Learner roles Teacher roles


Instructional
Learners in Total Physical Response
The teacher plays an active and direct
role in Total Physical Response. "The
Materials
have the primary roles of listener and instrucror is the director of a stage play
performer. They listen attentively and in which the students are the actors"It is Asher has developed TPR student kits that
respond physicall y to commands given the teacher who decides what to teach, focus on specific situations, such as the
by the teacher. Learners are required to who models and presents the new home, the supermarket, the beach.
respond both individually and materials, and who selects supporting Students may use the kits to construct
collectively. Il};Hcrials for dass ronm lise scenes
Asher (1977) provides a lesson-by-Iesson account of a
course taught according to TPR principles, which serves as
a source of information on the procedures used in the TPR
classroom.
Procedure • Verbs associated with nouns though instructions and
actions.
• Students could answer the questions then.
• Role Reversal
• Reading and writing
Conclusion
Total Physical Response is in a sense a revival and extensi on of Palmer and Palmer's English
Through Actions, updated with references to more recent psychologica l theories. It has enjoyed
some popularity because of its support by those who emphasize the role of comprehension in
second language acquisition. Krashen (1981 ), for example, regards provision of
comprehensible input and reduction of stress as keys to successful language acquisition, and he
sees performing physica l actions in the target language as a means of 'maki ng input
comprehensible and minimizing stress. The experimental support for the effectiveness of Total
Physica l Response is sketchy (as it is for most methods) and typicall y dea ls with only the very
beginning stages of learning. TPR practices therefore may be effective for reasons other than
those proposed by Asher and do not necessa ri ly demand commitment to the learning theories
used to justify them.
Than
k You

You might also like