Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Urban Crime and Disasters
Urban Crime and Disasters
Urban Crime and Disasters
subculture of violence
subculture of poverty
Common to both types is the belief that certain groups carry sets of norms and values that
make them more likely to engage in crime. The subculture of violence thesis holds that high
rates of violence result from a culture where criminality in general, and violence in particular,
are more acceptable forms of behavior. Carriers of a subculture of violence are quicker to
resort to violence than others. Situations that normally might simply anger others could
provoke violence by those carrying subculture of violence values.
Subcultural theorists claim that social institutions themselves contribute to the
development and persistence of a subculture conducive to criminality and violence.
For example, the disintegration of particular institutions (i.e., churches, families, and
schools) denies certain populations (and in particular, minorities) the opportunity to learn
conventional norms and values. The result of such processes is that certain groups are
more likely to use violence in their day-to-day encounters, and violence is seen as an
acceptable means to solving disputes.
REASONS
Population and migration
Adverse conditions, high population densities, rapid changes in
social environments and other factors can produce substantial
and unpredictable crime patterns.
Urban poverty
Factors ranging from the degree of effectiveness of law enforcement
and crime prevention mechanisms to the availability of social support
structures and the extent to which people have a meaningful interest or ability
to participate in social, political and economic activities have well-\
documented links to crime, and all are rapidly eroded as conditions
deteriorate in urban settings.
Youth and urban crime
Youth are also more exposed to the risk of victimization, which is
itself linked to future criminality in some cases, and to poverty,
marginalization and other conditions which have been shown to
have similar links.
Gangs
Gang operations provide a substantial motivation for crime, both
in support of the social and economic activities that sustain the
group, and in competition with or defence from other gangs,
other criminal groups, law enforcement or society at large. Gangs
also propagate crime as they expand, spread and diversify when
conditions are favourable and as their members move from one
place to another and in and out of prison.
Reasons ….
Crime rates in urban areas are more widespread than those in rural areas. Random
crime sprees are more common in urban areas because of the crowd theory. More
populated than a rural area, thus less likely to get caught. Less isolated crime in urban
areas.
On the other hand in the rural areas, if you go over to your neighbor's yard and steal
say a flower box off of his front lawn, it is going to be much more obvious than in a
heavily populated area. Less people in living in urban areas don't look out for
criminals, so they could care less about their neighbors' belongings much less than
their own. But in a rural area, there's more surveillance from neighborhood crime
fighting groups. More people tend to notice when something is amiss in the rural
neighborhood.
Architecturally…
The lack or inadequacy of a natural vigilance system; there were no urban facilities
(such as benches, terraces, kiosks, etc ) which would have enabled the users of that
space to remain there for a few moments, and participate, albeit unconsciously, in the
process of natural vigilance.
A weak relationship between the interior and exterior of buildings: ground floor
windows were frequently protected by bars, and commercial establishments did not
have display windows giving visual access directly onto the street. This characteristic
is quite possibly a consequence of the feelings of insecurity experienced by residents,
who close themselves up inside their buildings .In fact, this kind of behavior tends to
reduce security in real terms, because it potentially lowers the levels of community
participation in neighbourhood vigilance. This aspect is typical of urban areas with
security problems.
URBAN DISASTERS
BETWEEN 1974 AND 2003, 6367 NATURAL
DISASTERS OCCURRED GLOBALLY, CAUSING
THE DEATH OF 2 MILLION PEOPLE AND
AFFECTING 5.1 BILLION PEOPLE. A TOTAL OF
182 MILLION PEOPLE WERE MADE HOMELESS,
• ECONOMIC DAMAGE AMOUNTED TO
US$1.38 TRILLION. SINCE 1975, THE
NUMBER OF NATURAL DISASTERS
RECORDED GLOBALLY HAS INCREASED
• A TOTAL OF 98 PER CENT OF THE 211
MILLION PEOPLE AFFECTED BY NATURAL
DISASTERS ANNUALLY FROM 1991 TO 2000
WERE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
REASONS FOR URBAN DISASTERS
Usage of materials
The materials used for building and industry construction may produce gas, liquid, or solids that
place those living in their vicinity at risk – from explosions, collapse, and impact on the
environment.
One of the important characteristics of vulnerability due to urbanisation results from
construction that does not meet building and industry standards
India’s Vulnerability to Disasters
Apart from natural disasters, some cities in India are also vulnerable to chemical and industrial disasters and
man-made disasters.
DISASTERS IN INDIA
Submitted by
ANAVADYA ASHOKAN
ASWIN LAL KC
NANDANA BALAMURALI
STEPHIN SAMUEL THOMAS