The document analyzes child labor in the fireworks industries of Sivakasi, India. It discusses the history of widespread child labor in Sivakasi, with over 45,000 children under 14 employed in often dangerous conditions. International attention and government intervention through inspections and rehabilitation programs led to a rapid decline in child labor by the early 2000s. While bonded child labor has been eliminated, there remains some children over 14 now working full-time during holidays to earn money, and challenges in identifying illegal home-based manufacturing that may involve children.
The document analyzes child labor in the fireworks industries of Sivakasi, India. It discusses the history of widespread child labor in Sivakasi, with over 45,000 children under 14 employed in often dangerous conditions. International attention and government intervention through inspections and rehabilitation programs led to a rapid decline in child labor by the early 2000s. While bonded child labor has been eliminated, there remains some children over 14 now working full-time during holidays to earn money, and challenges in identifying illegal home-based manufacturing that may involve children.
The document analyzes child labor in the fireworks industries of Sivakasi, India. It discusses the history of widespread child labor in Sivakasi, with over 45,000 children under 14 employed in often dangerous conditions. International attention and government intervention through inspections and rehabilitation programs led to a rapid decline in child labor by the early 2000s. While bonded child labor has been eliminated, there remains some children over 14 now working full-time during holidays to earn money, and challenges in identifying illegal home-based manufacturing that may involve children.
Submitted By S. Sadhana 20020 •The Factories Act of 1948
•The Mines Act of 1952.
•The Child Labour
(Prohibition and Regulation) Act of 1986
• The Juvenile Justice (Care
and Protection) of Children Act of 2000
•The Right of Children to Free
and Compulsory Education Act of 2009
Child labour laws in India
THE FIREWORKS INDUSTRIES OF SIVAKASI •Sivakasi famous for fireworks, matchbox, printing press •World renowned manufacturer of firework •Hides a grim reality, nearly 45,000 children were employed •In the fireworks industries, below the age •Of 14 • Largest concentration of child Labourers. •While industrial development grew, gained notoriety for •Exploiting children •Though child labour is rare now, there are news of children •Getting rescued. HISTORY OF CHILD LABOUR IN SIVAKASI • Throughout 1980s until early 2000, Sivakasi filled with child workers, working for 150/day. • between ages of 3 and 15 • work in dingy places for 15 hours • no opportunities for pursuing education • Early death, diagnosed with asthma and tuberculosis, explosions in factories ERADICATION OF CHILD LABOUR IN SIVAKASI
(insights from PESO official and media reporter)
International attention due to activities of Christian missionaries Existence of several regulatory mechanisms Surprise inspections Implementation of National Child Labour Project
(interview with former child labourer now lawyer)
Rapid decline attributed to change in parents’ attitude Constant intervention by the government Rescued children are rehabilitated, provided Rs.500/month, aided till they receive a degree. DOES CHILD LABOUR STILL EXIST IN SIVAKASI?
• According to people interviewed, bonded child labour no
longer exists. But due to pandemic, there has been a slight rise in children working full time in factories. • Children above 14 years work at these fireworks industries to earn money for themselves and not to get their families out of poverty. Teenagers from both the city and nearby villages can be found working during holidays. They get paid Rs. 200 per day and work from 9 AM to 5 PM. • Several cases of illegal manufacturing of explosives at home, difficult to identify and remove. • Success of Sivakasi is due to efforts by the government along with awareness and cooperation amongst people of Sivakasi • Case: M.C.Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu (1996)