Changes of Anesthesia Protocols Aiming To Reduce Blood Loss During Major Liver Resections

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 53

Changes of anesthesia protocols

aiming to reduce blood loss


during major liver resections
E. Odisseeva
The Goals of Anesthesia in 2000’s

• Patient Safety

• Surgeon Comfort

• Promotion of accelerated recovery


The Goals of Anesthesia in 2000’s

• Patient Safety

• Surgeon Comfort

• Promotion of accelerated recovery

Anesthesia for LR - very specific process


i o n
f us
n s
tr a ?
m o l e m
ae r o b
s H P
I a

Transfusion Medicine Copyright (c) 2007-2009, Pathology Outlines.coм / Last revised 19 January 2009 / Last major update August 2007
In Liver Surgery …….
TACO
(Тransfusion Related Cardiac Overload )

 Inevitable in any transfusion of FFP or RBC


 The increase of plasma volume leads to bleeding
difficult to control
 In the condition of liver mass reduction:
 Residual liver parenchyma congestion
 Liver ischemia due to portal hypertension and hepatic
arterial vasoconstriction due to HABR
In Liver Surgery…….
 TRALI – ( Transfusion Related Lung Injury )

 Dilution coagulopathy – massive transfusion

 TRIM – (Transfusion Related Immune Modulation)

 Effect is associated with every unit blood product transfused

 TRIM may increase nosocomial infections rate

 Delayed wounds healing

 Sepsis

 Immunosuppression is detrimental for tumor surveillance


Avoiding Transfusions:
Is This Important?
 Non transfused pts had fewer complications
than those receiving blood
(33% vs 46%, P<.0001)

 Receiving 1-2 units had fewer complications


than those receiving > 2units
(42% vs 51%, P=.03)

Kooby D. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 860


Effect of Intraoperative Blood Transfusion
on Patient Outcome in Hepatic Transplantation
Thomas V. Cacciarelli, MD; Emmet B. Keeffe, MD; Dan H. Moore, PhD; Washington Burns, MD;
Stephan Busque, MD; Waldo Concepcion, MD; Samuel K. S. So, MD; Carlos O. Esquivel, MD, PhD
From Liver International
Morbidity and Mortality After Liver Resection for Benign
and Malignant Hepatobiliary Lesions
DehaErdogan; Olivier R.C. Busch; Dirk J. Gouma; Thomas M. van Gulik
Published: 04/02/2009
Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost
After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients Having
Cardiac Surgery
Gavin J. Murphy, BSc, ChB, MD, FRCS(CTh); and al .
Circulation 2007;116;2544-2552; published online Nov 12, 2007;

Survival rate changes with transfusion of blood products during liver transplantation [Le taux de survie change avec la
transfusion de produits sanguins pendant la transplantation hépatique]
Luc Massicotte MD, et al CAN J ANESTH 2005 / 52: 2 / pp 148–155
Institutional Variability in Transfusion Practice for Liver Transplantation
Yves Ozier, MD*, FabiennePessione, MD†, Emmanuel Samain, MD‡, and Francoise Courtois, MD§, for the French Study
Group on Blood Transfusion in Liver Transplantation *
ANESTH ANALG 2003;97:671–9

Visgeral organ resections combined with synchronous major hepatectomy :


examples of safety and feasibility
RE Schwarz Division of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey
HPB 2003 Volume 5, number I 27-32

Morbidity of Major Hepatic Resections: a 100-Case Prospective Study


Bernard Pol, Pierre Campan, Jean Hardwigsen, Genevie`veBotti,Julien Pons and Y. Patrice Le Treut
From the Department of Surgery, Hoˆpital de la Conception and Department of Medical Information,
Hoˆpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 446–453

One Thousand Fifty-Six Hepatectomies Without Mortality in 8 Years


Hiroshi Imamura, MD, PhD; Yasuji Seyama, MD; NorihiroKokudo, MD, PhD; Atsushi Maema, MD, PhD;
Yasuhiko Sugawara, MD, PhD; Keiji Sano, MD, PhD; TadatoshiTakayama, MD, PhD; Masatoshi Makuuchi,
MD, PhD Arch Surg. 2003;138:1198-1206

Impact of Blood Loss on Outcome after Liver Resection.


de Boer, Marieke T; Molenaar, I. Quintus ; Porte, Robert J.
Digestive Surgery; 2007, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p259-264, 6p
THBF
(~100 mL/min/100 g liver
mass)
Surgical strategy to reduce blood loss
Inflow control - Hilus occlusion
Hemodynamic effects
•Systemic arterial pressure
10%
•Systemic vascular resistance
40%
•Cardiac index 10%
•Release of clamp leads to
decrease in blood pressure that
returns to normal in a few
minutes
Outflow control -
TVE
Hemodynamic Effect of TVE
Traité d’anesthésie générale A mises à jour périodiques Bernard DALENS 2001
Limitations
• Limitation of surgical time – 60:90 min

• Hemodynamic effects
• Bowel edema, smaller operating field with limited
surgical exposure and difficult closure

• Warm ischemia

• Reperfusion syndrome

• Failure of Hilus Clamping to Control Bleeding


Anesthesiologic strategy
Anesthesiologic strategy
Intraoperative Monitoring
 Circulation :
NIBP, IBP, CVP, diuresis

 Ventilation:
MV, TV, Paw, PEEP,
PeCO2, SpO2
Anesthesiologic strategy
The reasons for hypotension
• Reduction of venous return and CO by:
– Manipulation in the liver hilus
– IVC, v.portae and v. hepatics clampaging
– Direct VCI compression
• Loss of intravascular volume
– Bleeding
– Vaporization from the surgical field
• Air embolism
How we can manage hypotension
• Volume replacement
– Cristaloid
– Coloid
– Blood and blood products
• Vasoconstrictors
– Noradrenalin
– Dopamin
Anesthesiologic strategy
Fluids: is caution required?
Massicote L. Liver transplantation 2006 ; 117-123

• Low hydrostatic pressure during LR is


associated with decreased blood loss
• Hemodilution
– Reduce hematocrit
– Trigger RBC transfusion
– Decreases Plt efficacy
– Dilute and/or alter physiological balance of
coagulation factors
Complications of Crystalloid Fluid
Resuscitation
 Hypothermia
  calcium,  magnesium (Dilutional)
 Coagulopathy
─ Dilutional
─ Consumptive
─ Hypothermia
─ Hypocalcemia
 Edema
 Acidosis - non-anion gap
metabolic acidosis
─ Confusion with anion gap metabolic acidosis
─ Check chloride
Complications of Crystalloid Fluid
Resuscitation
 Hypothermia
  calcium,  magnesium (Dilutional)
 Coagulopathy
─ Dilutional
─ Consumptive
─ Hypothermia
─ Hypocalcemia
 Edema
 Acidosis - non-anion gap
metabolic acidosis
─ Confusion with anion gap metabolic acidosis
─ Check chloride
Complications of Crystalloid Fluid
Resuscitation
 Hypothermia
  calcium,  magnesium (Dilutional)
 Coagulopathy
─ Dilutional
─ Consumptive
─ Hypothermia
─ Hypocalcemia
 Edema
 Acidosis - non-anion gap
metabolic acidosis
─ Confusion with anion gap metabolic acidosis
─ Check chloride
Complications of Colloid
Resuscitation

• Fluid overload
• Coagulopathy
– Dilution
– Direct  factor VIII
– theoretically after 2L
• Platelet aggregation problems
Anesthesiologic strategy
Transfusion trigger

• In case of massive hemorrhage >30% of BV

• Hemorrhage without surgical control

• Hb < 70 g/l

• Ht < 0.22

• Exception for pts with CAD - Hb > 90 g/l


Anesthesiologic strategy
Low CVP < 6 mmHg
 M.Johnson ; R.Mannar1998
 Liverpool UK
6 – 12
CVP > 12 mmHg
CVP < 6 mmHg mmHg

303 ml 1259 ml 2703 ml

↑2 x CVР ↑9 x Blood loss


Anesthesiologic strategy
Temperature monitoring and control
July 2004 - December 2009
Military Medical Academy
Clinic of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and
Transplant Surgery
 130 patients
 High volume liver resection – > 3
segments
 Factors contributing hemorrhage
Study Design
 Сut-point - blood loss > 500 ml
o Group 1 - blood loss < 500 ml
o Group 2 - blood loss > 500 ml

 Infusion therapy protocol


o 2004 – 2007 - liberal strategy
o 2008 – 2009 - restrictive strategy
The groups are Statistically Comparable
N of pts Blood Sex Age НСС Meta СА- Benign % Cancer
loss М/F (average) CRC others

77 < 500 40 / 37 58,2 11 51 12 3 96 %

53 > 500 25 / 29 57,1 14 32 6 1 98,1%

<500 ml >500 ml Total


Period 2004 - 2007 27 43 70

Period 2008 - 2009 50 10 60

Total 77 53 130
Group 1 Group 2
Operation N segments
< 500 ml > 500 ml
HHD
3 31 33

HLD
4 4 4

HHS 3 16 7

Meso H
3 6 2
HLS + Sg + MetA
> 3 сегм. 17 5

Sg resection > 3 сегм. 3 2

Total 77 53
N of Pts Compared to Periods
80
70
60
10
50 43
40 Blood loss <500
30 Blood loss >500
50
20
27
10
0
2 0 04-2007 2 0 08 -2009
Pourcentage
80
70
60
17 %
50 62%
40 Blood loss>500
30 Blood loss<500
83%
20
38%
10
0
2 0 04-2007 2 0 08-2009
Blood loss in ml
1200
1000
800
600 Group 1
1017
400 Group 2
200
277
0

Blood los s
Group 1 < 500 ml Group 2 > 500 ml

Operative time 215,1 min (120 – 450) 239 min (120 – 480)

Hepatectomy 59,68 min ( 30 – 150) 70,37 min (30 – 130)

Blood loss 277,3 ml(50 – 500) 1017 ml ( 600 – 2300)

Hemotransfusion 3,64 ml (0 – 280 ) average 473 ml ( 0 - 1300) average

FFP 27,3 ml ( 0 – 270) average 178 ml ( 0 – 990)


average
Pringle 46 pts (59,7%) 48 pts (90,5%)

Pringle - clampage time 25,9 min ( 7 – 70) 27,3 min (10 – 70)
Group 1 < 500 ml Group 2 > 500 ml

Operative time 215,1 min (120 – 450) 239 min (120 – 480)

Hepatectomy 59,68 min ( 30 – 150) 70,37 min (30 – 130)

Blood loss 277,3 ml(50 – 500) 1017 ml ( 600 – 2300)

Hemotransfusion 3,64 ml (0 – 280 ) average 473 ml ( 0 - 1300) average

FFP 27,3 ml ( 0 – 270) average 178 ml ( 0 – 990)


average
Pringle 46 pts (59,7%) 48 pts (90,5%)

Pringle - clampage time 25,9 min ( 7 – 70) 27,3 min (10 – 70)
Group 1 < 500 ml Group 2 > 500 ml
Infusion 6,1 ml/kg ( 3 – 11) 8,3 ml/kg (4 – 18)

Coloids 268,2 ml average 665.7 ml average

CVP - beginning 6,6 mmHg 8,4 mmHg

CVP– hepatectomy 6,4 mmHg 8,2 mmHg

CVP– end 6,4 mmHg 7,9 mmHg

Diuresis 0,9 ml/kg /h (0,2 – 4,5) 1,8 ml/kg /h (0,4 – 6,4)

Hypotension 13 pts 22 pts

Vasopressor 13 pts 12 pts

Balance - infusion - 31,81ml 583, 15 ml


Group 1 < 500 ml Group 2 > 500 ml
Infusion 6,1 ml/kg ( 3 – 11) 8,3 ml/kg (4 – 18)

Coloids 268,2 ml average 665.7 ml average

CVP - beginning 6,6 mmHg 8,4 mmHg

CVP– hepatectomy 6,4 mmHg 8,2 mmHg

CVP– end 6,4 mmHg 7,9 mmHg

Diuresis 0,9 ml/kg /h (0,2 – 4,5) 1,8 ml/kg /h (0,4 – 6,4)

Hypotension 13 pts 22 pts

Vasopressor 13 pts 12 pts

Balance - infusion - 31,81ml 583, 15 ml


Group 1 < 500 ml Group 2 > 500 ml

ICU 62 pts (80 %) 52 pts (96,26%)

Intubation 32 pts (41,5 %) 43 pts (81,13%)

ICU - days 0,9 days 1,6 days

Postoperative 7 pts (9,09%) 15 pts (28%)


infection
Liver dysfunction 15 pts (19,48%) 27 pts (50,9%)

МОD* 3 pts (3,86%) 6 pts (11,3%)

Mean hospital stay 10,7 days ( 2 – 34) 14,13 days (6 – 36 )

Morbidity 2 pts (2, 59 %) 4 pts (7,54 %)


Group 1 < 500 ml Group 2 > 500 ml

ICU 62 pts (80 %) 52 pts (96,26%)

Intubation 32 pts (41,5 %) 43 pts (81,13%)

ICU - days 0,9 days 1,6 days

Postoperative 7 pts (9,09%) 15 pts (28%)


infection
Liver dysfunction 15 pts (19,48%) 27 pts (50,9%)

МОD* 3 pts (3,86%) 6 pts (11,3%)

Mean hospital stay 10,7 days ( 2 – 34) 14,13 days (6 – 36 )

Morbidity 2 pts (2, 59 %) 4 pts (7,54 %)


Morbidity

 Intraoperative mortality - 0 %
 Mortality rate – 5.17 %
 Group 1 – 3.12 %
 Group 2 – 13 %
 Relaparotomy for bleeding – 3 pts
(2.5 %)
Factors Contributing Bleeding
 Surgeon – the first and most important
 Aggressive Infusion
 Resection of v. cava inferior
 Operative time
 Child-Pugh score
 Liver parenchyma quality
 Localization of the lesion

You might also like