A proprietary building element is a material or form of construction that can be used as a fire wall system provided it has been constructed in accordance with an acceptable code or guideline as specified in the legislation. Passive fire systems are defined in the prescriptive requirements of specification is referenced in part 1.2. Of volume 2 of the BCA.
A proprietary building element is a material or form of construction that can be used as a fire wall system provided it has been constructed in accordance with an acceptable code or guideline as specified in the legislation. Passive fire systems are defined in the prescriptive requirements of specification is referenced in part 1.2. Of volume 2 of the BCA.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
A proprietary building element is a material or form of construction that can be used as a fire wall system provided it has been constructed in accordance with an acceptable code or guideline as specified in the legislation. Passive fire systems are defined in the prescriptive requirements of specification is referenced in part 1.2. Of volume 2 of the BCA.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
CERTCON PTY LTD – BUNDABERG BUILDING CERTFIERS Fire Safety Adviser QFRS Lic. No: 0525 Bachelor Building Surveying Graduate Certificate in Performance Based Building & Fire Codes Graduate Diploma in Building Fire Safety & Risk Engineering OVERVIEW Referenced document is Building Code of Australia (BCA 2009); What is the difference between proprietary and passive fire systems? What design information in is required on plans in relation to passive fire products? What is a tested passive fire system and how do you know? How is this information required to be referenced?
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE SYSTEM Is concrete block or brick veneer construction a proprietary building element or a passive fire building element? A proprietary building element is a material or form of construction that can be used as a fire wall system provided it has been constructed in accordance with an acceptable code or guideline as specified in the legislation, in this instance Part 1.2 of the BCA.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE SYSTEM Both concrete block and brick veneer when constructed in accordance with AS3600 and AS3700 respectively are assumed to meet the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions of the BCA for the required FRL. The proprietary systems are defined in the prescriptive requirements of specification is referenced in part 1.2.3 of volume 2 of the BCA.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE SYSTEM Section 5 of AS3600 provides the design criteria for fire resistance levels for concrete structures and in particular section 5.7 for walls. As with the concrete structures Section 6 of AS3700 sets out the design of masonry to resist the effects of fire and provides the methods for determining fire resistance levels for masonry.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE SYSTEM Most proprietary product suppliers have documentation for fire resistance levels for their building elements when used as fire separating wall as discussed previously. This information must be included in detail on the plans so as to avoid any ambiguity between the design and the construction stages. Some example of proprietary products are technical manuals from manufactures: Hebel – Adbir masonry – Austral bricks etc.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE SYSTEM These technical manuals will provide the following information as per the Adbir masonry manual:
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE AND SOUND SYSTEM These proprietary manuals can include additional information in relation to sound insulation for the wall systems as per the Adbir masonry manual . 2.2 Design of walls for sound insulation These wall systems are usually used in internal applications in commercial, industrial, institutional, domestic and high-rise domestic construction, or in the renovation of older buildings. Wall systems generally incorporate single leaf concrete masonry, CSR Bradford® Insulation products and CSR Gyprock®. Systems which require CSR product are based on the CSR ‘The Red Book TM’ Section ‘D’ Masonry Wall Systems. The Rw and Rw + Ctr values shown in the wall systems are only applicable when using Hanson Masonry products and CSR products.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE AND SOUND SYSTEM This proprietary system has been tested in conjunction with the CSR products to achieve both the fire and sound requirements for construction. This manual also provided an indication where that particular sound transmission and impact requirements from the BCA are required. Again the relevant point is that the system used must be the system specified and tested!
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE AND SOUND SYSTEM
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE AND SOUND SYSTEM This particular system uses resilient battens with a cavity in the block to achieve the required sound levels and the discontinuous construction
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE AND SOUND SYSTEM This system if used as part of the design for our units would be documented as: Bounding construction FRL as per Adbir masonry manual Table B (non-basalt) 20.01 details, and Sound transmission system Rw + Ctr and discontinuous construction as per Adbir masonry manual Table J system A11.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PROPRIETARY FIRE AND SOUND SYSTEM It is important as designers to clarify and document the type of system used in the design to achieve the required fire and sound levels. This will be further clarified in the case study to follow. Accurate information must be shown on the documentation to avoid ambiguity and incorrect construction practice. Additionally the documentation should clarify that if the proposed system, as designed is varied, the designer and the certifier must be consulted prior to affecting any changes.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY AND TESTING
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING First Australian Standard No. A.30 Based on BS 476 - 1932 • First Published in 1935 and last published 1969 • It incorporated the following: Combustibility Test of Materials Flammability Test of Materials Early Fire Hazard Test of Materials Fire-Resistance Test of Structures
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING Heating curve was not a standard curve but tabulated and graphed for first hour and 2-6 hours to achieve the following temperatures: 538°C at 5 min 704°C at 10 min 843°C at 30 min 927°C at 1 hr 1010°C at 2 hr 1021°C at 4 hr 1204°C at 6 hr
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING This test evolved into AS1530.4 and was first published 1975 and last published in 1979 Based on A.S. No. A.30 but published with ‘metric units’ Combustibility, Flammability and Early Fire Hazard separated into AS 1530.1, AS 1530.2 and AS 1530.3 respectively.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING AS1530.4 was first published on 10 May 1985 Based on the essential principles of ISO 834 AS1530.4 1985 included separate sections for: Doorsets, Shutter Assemblies and Damper Assemblies Elements Penetrated by Services Floors, Roofs, Floor/Ceiling Systems and Roof/Ceiling Systems Beams, Girders and Trusses Walls and Partitions Columns Air Ducts Glazing
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING AS1530.4 1990 was first published 19 January 1990, introducing the concept of Fire-resistance levels (FRL) in which the performance of the element with regard to Structural Adequacy, Integrity and Insulation are reported separately.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING The tests used a standard time temperature curve
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING Typical test of passive products with furnace behind
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING Diagrammatic example of a typical fire test for passive fire systems. This example shows an FRL of 60/60/60. This means that during a fire test, the system did not fail for 60 minutes for each of the criteria.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING The same type of furnace test is undertaken for the Resistance to the Incipient Spread of Fire (RISF). Resistance to the Incipient Spread of Fire is the ability of a ceiling to limit the temperature rise in the ceiling cavity, stopping flashover.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING The testing processes and procedures for passive fire systems are specific and stringent. Therefore the use of these systems for the construction of fire separating walls to replicate the tested specimen is also specific and stringent. Not only from a building designers documentation but also the construction practices used on site.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
HISTORY & TESTING Invariably there may be some deviations from the tested specimen, as part of the construction process. It would seem impossible for on site construction techniques to replicate laboratory testing but construction must replicates the prototype. In the case study we will look at some of these deviations and the consequences that developed as a result of a fire!
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE PRODUCTS There are many manufactures of passive fire products and these manufactures incorporate numerous products in addition to wall linings. As can be seen from a previous slide they also include: Ceiling lining; Fire collars; Fire pillows; Fire doors; Fire shutters; Fire sealant etc.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE PRODUCTS Having considered the significance of specifying the correct systems, What are we looking for in our design and how are we to document the products? Firstly as with the previous presentation a decision has to be made in relation to the BCA DtS requirements for our separating walls.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE PRODUCTS Our units will require a 60/60/60 wall. Some part of the wall will require an Rw + Ctr ≥ 50 whilst other parts of the wall require an Rw + Ctr ≥ 50 with discontinuous construction. Will these differing construction requirements (some in the same wall plane) effect the construction of the wall/s, thickness etc?
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE PRODUCTS What passive products are available to use? Boral, Lafarge and CSR are just a few manufactures with literature available . It should be emphasised that most tested systems have maximum wall height limitation in relation to their products. The base construction material for the construction of the passive fire separating wall may be either steel or timber.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN For the purposes of this presentation, our designer has selected timber as the base material and also CSR systems 670 and 671 from the CSR red book.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN CSR 670 is proposed to be used between the garage and the adjoining unit and CVSR 671 between the bathroom/laundry and the living kitchen of the adjoining unit. You will note that the systems do not offer a stud size only a top and bottom plate size. The stud sizes are a design requirement for the building designer and are linked to the proposed wall height as noted previously.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN Table C2 contains the stud sizes for the particular wall type and wall height.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN Note the stud thickness from table C2 for the stagged stud wall!
Can we use a 120 plate when the studs are required to be 120 and still have staggered and discontinuous construction?
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN All of this information must be considered and documented with the design criteria. Without this information how will the contractor undertaking the construction of the fire walls, construct them in accordance with the tested prototype? If a problem or a situation arises who is responsible for rectification? As you will see in the case study, a situation did arise and it is still to be determined who or whom is to be held responsible!
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN A further point to consider when selecting and designing a fire separating wall that has a load bearing capacity is the axial effect on the wall in a fire situation. The CSR manual states the following design considerations: Load bearing Walls; Walls designed as load bearing, with studs at 600mm maximum centres and lined with GYPROCK FYRCHEK, meet the requirements of BCA Specification C1.8 Clause 3.4 – Walls generally. The building designer must ensure load bearing walls have been designed: • To resist all applied loads. • To be in accordance with AS1720.1 or AS1684. • Assuming no contribution to axial strength is required of the wall linings
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN For bracing capacities in accordance with brochure NºGYP545 To meet the stated Fire Resistance Level (FRL), the axial load capacity of some wall systems is reduced. This is a result of loss of stud section from charring during a fire test. The systems are noted with an Axial Capacity Reduction (ACR) Group number. In these systems, the designer must increase the applied loads to compensate for the axial capacity reduction percentage, as shown in Table C3. 09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN The axial capacity reduction are noted in the tables and refers the designer to Table C3 of the manual.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN The CSR manual clarifies this table by stating : The FRL associated with a system noted in Table 3 applies when the timber studs are designed for reduced axial capacity. This reduction in stud capacity may be achieved by increasing the design vertical load by the appropriate percentage of the reduction. What does this mean!
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
PASSIVE FIRE WALL DESIGN Typically it refers to a reduction in the axial load capacity of the timber studs in a fire situation, specifically where timber studs are subjected to charring as a result of the fire. The charring rates of timber is a property of timber and once the timber reaches the prescribed level of char the performance of the wall is compromised and a capacity reduction applied as noted in table C3.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
SUMMARY It must be stressed that the design documentation includes; A passive fire system that meets the DtS provisions of the BCA. The passive fire system that is proposed has been tested to achieve the DtS provisions of the BCA. The separating wall system has been designed and tested to achieve the sound weighting levels and discontinuous requirements for the particular location within the building.
09/12/21 BDAQ 2009 Spring PD Road Show
SUMMARY Sections and elevations as applicable to alleviate any uncertainty in the proposed construction of the wall system by contractors. Notations that if the proposed system is to deviate from the design criteria as documented, the relevant persons must be informed prior to undertaking any such changes.