Factors Influencing Problem Solving

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Factors influencing problem

solving
Problem solving: Factors

effective problem solving requires an ideal blend of both top-down and bottom-up processing

people with expertise use top-down processing effectively when they solve problems; they
take advantage of factors such as their knowledge, memory, and strategies.

both mental set and functional fixedness can interfere when we try to solve a problem; both
of these factors rely too heavily on top-down processing.

Factors
• Expertise
• Mental set
• Functional fixedness
Factor: Expertise
An individual with expertise demonstrates consistently exceptional skill and performance on
representative tasks for a particular area

Experts in a particular discipline have


• superior long-term memory related to that discipline
• detailed structure of their concepts

Experts differ from novices on several dimension crucial for problem solving
• Knowledge base
• Memory
• Problem solving strategies
• Speed and accuracy
• Metacognitive skills
Expertise: Knowledge base & Memory

Knowledge • Experts and novices differ substantially in their knowledge base and schemas
• Compared to novices

base
• Experts have broader and deeper knowledge base
• Experts have detailed and specific schemas

• Experts differ from novices with respect to their memory for information related to their area of expertise
• The memory skills of experts tend to be very specific.

Memory
• They differ from novices in the time taken to retrieve information
• For example,
• expert chess players have much better memory than novices for various chess positions
• chess experts can remember about 50,000 ‘‘chunks,’’ or familiar arrangements of chess pieces
• chess experts are only slightly better than novices at remembering random arrangements of the chess pieces
Expertise: Problem solving strategies

When experts encounter They are more likely to Experts and novices
a novel problem in their approach a problem differ in the way they use
area of expertise, systematically the analogy approach
• they are more likely • whereas novices are • experts are more likely
than novices to use the more likely to have a to emphasize the
means-ends heuristic haphazard approach structural similarity
effectively between problems
• novices are more likely
to be distracted by
surface similarities
Expertise: Speed and accuracy
On some tasks (anagram solving),
Experts are much faster than novices
experts may solve problems faster
and also solve problems very
because they use parallel processing,
accurately
rather than serial processing
• Their operations become more • they typically solved the anagrams
automatic so quickly that they must have been
• A particular stimulus situation also considering several possible
quickly triggers a response solutions at the same time
• novices solved the anagrams so
slowly that they were probably using
serial processing
Expertise:Metacognitive skills

Experts seem to be better at judging the difficulty of a problem

They are more skilled at allocating their time appropriately when solving problems

Experts can also recover relatively quickly when they realize that they have made an error

Experts, however, perform poorly on one task related to metacognition


• underestimate the amount of time that novices will require to solve a problem in the experts’ area of
specialization
• the novices are more accurate in realizing that they will have trouble solving the problem
Factor: Mental set
• Water-jar problem
Factor: Mental set
compared to trials when they keep Mental sets are related to fixed and
When having a mental set trying their customary problem- growth mindset concept by Carol
solving strategy Dweck (2006)
• Individuals keep trying the same • People have a greater change in their • In a fixed mindset
solution they used in previous event-related brain potentials (ERPs) • People believe that they possess a
problems, even though they could on trials when they break a mental certain amount of intelligence and
solve the problem by using a set other skills
different, easier method. • no amount of effort can help them
• People close their mind prematurely, perform better
and stop thinking about how to solve • They give up on trying to discover
a problem effectively new ways to improve abilities
• Top-down processing is more active • In a growth mindset
• People believe that they can
cultivate your intelligence and
other skills
• Challenge themselves to perform
better
Factor: Functional fixedness
• Duncker’s candle problem
Functional fixedness

But, functional fixedness In our everyday life, most Objects in our world
functional fixedness Like mental set refers to the way we think of us have access to a normally have fixed
about physical objects variety of tools and objects functions
• Our tendency to assign • functional fixedness • While mental set refers to • so functional fixedness • For example,
stable or fixed functions occurs when our top- problem-solving does not create a • we use a screwdriver to
to an object down processing is strategies significant handicap. tighten a screw,
• Hence, we fail to think overactive • we use a coin to
about the features of this purchase something.
object that might be • Functional fixedness
useful in helping us solve occurs, however, when
a problem we apply that strategy
too rigidly
• we may fail to realize
that—if we don’t have a
screwdriver—a coin
may provide a handy
substitute

You might also like