Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice
JUSTICE
Presented by:
Abhishek S 18BCE1311
Sharath Akash P 18BEC1014
R. K. Arjun 18BEC1120
Ishwara Prabhu S 18BEC1122
S V Jayanth 18BEC1137
B Visweshwaran 18BEC1152
A Deepak Kumar 18BEC1277
Prathulyan N 18BLC1023
What is Environmental Justice?
● Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people
regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.
● Part of the difficulty is that citizens cannot take part in decision making
processes that impact the environment.
● India ranks 3rd in the world’s most polluted countries and New Delhi is the
most polluted capital city in the world.
● Not all people are affected equally. Every social issue has a major impact on
the poor.
● Indore carried out a survey and halted 7,000 outfalls of greywater that went in rivers, drains.
● Moreover, 30 per cent of the city’s sewage water was recycled and reused. This recycled
water was used by people in their gardens and some construction sites.
● Seven sewerage treatment plants were constructed in the city and about 110 million litres
• Water availability is a problem not just for Indore or Madhya Pradesh, but for most parts
of the country
• In Indore, the most privileged access water through pipes in their homes. The slightly less
fortunate have pipes in their lanes or a bore well near their dwelling. They are followed by
those who are provided water by the local administration via tankers
• Their access to the alternate source of government supply in urban India – municipal
water tankers – is also sporadic and unreliable because they remain on the fringes, as a
non-notified slum which faces frequent threats of eviction
• Family have to rely on largesse, primarily, of small industries in the area who provide
water from their bore wells – sometimes free of charge, and at times at a charge of
between Rs 100 and Rs 200. Often, particularly in the summer when the borewells tend to
dry up, they refuse to provide water.
• Now after obtaining this water plus city certificate even the poor are getting the
opportunity to access clean water.
CASE STUDY 2
● As Patnaik says “tourists need not have to carry water bottles everywhere. This initiative will
minimise plastic waste in the city every day”.
● Mission Drink from Tap aims at providing water supply 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, each
day of the year. The mission is also aimed at addressing the protection of water sources,
water treatment, and the prevention of recontamination in the transmission and distribution
system that is continuously full and under positive pressure throughout pipelines and
networks.
The three highlights
● The first is to provide 24X7 quality tap water to every household in urban
Odisha, so that water from household taps can be directly used for drinking,
without filtration or boiling, thus reducing the health risks caused by
contamination from the intermittent supply.
● To ensure this, water testing laboratories have been established for regular
quality monitoring and surveillance on PPP mode to ensure third-party
monitoring. There are centralised monitoring and tracking of preventive
maintenance and complaint redressals. Consumers can log in their complaints in
three languages – Odia, English and Hindi by dialling 155359.
● When this scheme under Sujala expands to other cities of the state, to at least 12
lakh urban dwellers, the Odisha government is targeting a revenue collection of
Rs 250 crore per annum (approximately).
CASE STUDY 3
• The trust in the tap has to be ingrained in the minds of the people. For that to
happen, the system needs to be proactive in a real sense.
• So,by not only congratulating the state,the others states should also take steps like
this so that everyone could drink a safe water from the tap and can get benefitted
from this.There is a lot of diseases spreading in rural areas due to improper water
and many are getting affected by contaminated drinking water.
• This idea can outbreak majority of other issues too including money and diseases
like jaundice and many other infections caused due to improper drinking
water.Every state should implement this in order to so that every person in the
country can drink safe water.
GOING FORWARD
• Multiple studies have shown the negative effects of hazardous waste siting on the health and well-
being of surrounding communities, but little was done to rectify the situation. The next frontiers of
environmental justice are taking “precautionary, preventative, and cumulative” approaches that
address the underlying compounding effects of multiple environmental shocks and persistent social
stressors on the same communities.
• By taking a cumulative, neighborhood-centric approach, researchers can better demonstrate the
severity of exposure communities experience. This approach will be critical for emerging
environmental hazards—like climate change’s effects or pandemic recovery—for which
environmental justice activists are pivoting to be proactive.
• Partnering with existing community organizations to incorporate contextual factors can ensure
something called “ground truthing,” or taking state-provided data, fostering citizen scientists, and
going door-to-door to affirm its accuracy.
• But researchers also need to be clearer about policies’ unintended effects. When policy helps
decrease pollution in neighborhoods, it can also make that neighborhood more desirable and drive
up housing costs. As a result, the original community may be hurt from interventions intending to
help.
• Ultimately, researchers need to “shake off the equality mindset and begin to think
equitably to account for where people already are and correct for past patterns of
disparity,” . Researchers can start designing better research by working across
disciplines, taking a cumulative approach, and partnering with those already in the
community.
• In his most recent book, Climate Change From the Streets, there is a quote that the
most effective environmental solutions will come from the communities suffering
the most – and that policymakers should listen to them.