Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Logistics and Channel Management
Logistics and Channel Management
CHAPTER 13
THE ROLE OF LOGISTICS
• 1. Product availability
• 2. Order cycle time
• 3. Distribution system flexibility
• 4. Distribution system information
• 5. Distribution system malfunction
• 6. Postsale product support
FOUR KEY AREAS OF INTERNET BETWEEN
LOGISTICS
AND CHANNEL MANAGEMENR
• 1. Defining Logistics Service Standards
• In general, the higher the service standards offered by the
manufacturer, the higher the cost will be. While well-
designed logistics systems and modern technology can
keep these cost under control, it is usually not possible to
completely escape the trade-off of higher costs for higher
service standards .A manufacturer or other channel
member must cover the costs either indirectly in the price
it charges for products or by passing them along to
channel members in the form of service charges.
• 2. Evaluating the Logistics Program
• Inadequate evaluation of a logistics system
can lead to horrendous problems in business-
to-business markets as well. This is especially
the case when so-called “killer software app”
(high-tech software for synchronizing the
supply chain) do not live up to over-hyped
expectations.
• 3. Selling the Channel Members on the Logistics
Program
• Regardless of how good a manufacturer perceives its
logistics program to be, it still must convince channel
members of its value. Steward made this point
succinctly in the seminal discussion of this topic:
• A word of caution! Changes in physical distribution
must be palatable to the company’s customers channel
members. Changes which provide cost benefits only to
the manufacturer without corresponding benefits to
customers may be more difficult to implement than
those that offer incentives to customers to change.
• Stewart went on to suggest several types of
appeals that, if emphasized by the manufacturer
in attempting to sell the logistics program, may
help the manufacturer to be more convincing.
They are as relevant today as ever. Manufacturers
should emphasize that a new logistics program
can foster:
• o Fewer out-of-stock occurrences
• o Reduced channel member inventories
• o Increased manufacturer support for channel
members
• 4. Monitoring the Logistics System
• The most effective way of monitoring channel
member reactions is to conduct a survey of a
sample of channel members. If the number of
channel members is small, it may be feasible
to include all of them.
Evaluating Channel Member
Performance
CHAPTER 14
FACTORS AFFECTING SSCOPE AND FREQUENCY
OF EVALUATION
• 1. Degree of Control
• The degree of control a producer, manufacturer or franchisor has over its
channel members plays a major role in determining the scope and
frequency of its evaluation. If control is based on strong contractual
agreements with channel members, the channel manager is in a position
to demand a great deal of information on channel member performance
on virtually every aspect of the channel members’ operations.
• 2. Importance of Channel Members
• For the manufacturer who sells all of its output through intermediaries,
the evaluation of channel members is likely to be much more
comprehensive than for manufacturers who rely less on intermediaries.
This is because the firm’s success in the market is so directly dependent
on the channel members’ performance.
• 3. Nature of the Product
• Generally, the more complex the product is, the broader the
scope of the evaluation and vice versa. For example, a
manufacturer of high-volume products of low unit value
requiring little after-sale servicing may settle for routine sales
data as the basis for an evaluation of channel members.
• 4. Number of Channel Members
• For the manufacturer using distribution, channel member
evaluation may be little more than a cursory“once over
lightly” look at current sales figures. Some manufacturers
find it necessary to use an“evaluation by exception” process
whereby a more thorough evaluation is reserved only for
those channel members who show sales figures that are
unusually out of line.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION VERSUS DAY-TO-DAY MONITORING