Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Counterparty Credit Risk: Roman Kornyliuk
Counterparty Credit Risk: Roman Kornyliuk
Counterparty Credit Risk: Roman Kornyliuk
Roman Kornyliuk,
Ph.D. in Finance
December 2012
Content
• Counterparty credit risk (CCR) definition
• CCR management tools
• CCR indicators
• CCR and Basel II
• CCR and Basel III
CCR DEFINITION
CCR definition
• Counterparty credit risk – the risk that the counterparty to
a financial contract will default prior to the expiration of
the contract and will not make all the payments required
by the contract.
- EE will be greater than the expected MtM since it concerns only the positive MtM values
EE EE and Effective EE
Effective EE is non-decreasing EE
EPE, Effective EPE
EPE (Expected Positive Exposure )
- the time-weighted average of individual expected exposures estimated
for given forecasting horizons (e.g. one year)
• Unilateral CVA assumes that the institution which does the CVA analysis (the
bank) is default-free. It gives the market value of future losses caused by the
counterparty’s potential default.
• Bilateral CVA takes into account the possibility of both the counterparty and
the bank defaulting. This is required for an objective fair value calculation
since both the bank and the counterparty require a premium for the credit
risk they are bearing.
• Unilateral CVA is now part of Basel III, while bilateral CVA is more in line with
the market practice at top financial institutions for pricing and hedging, as
well as accounting rules.
BASEL II
CCR and Basel II
Minimum Capital Requirements for Counterparty Credit Risk (1)
where
K(PD,LGD) is default-only capital factor that is calculated from PD &LGD according to:
For a portfolio of transactions covered under a legally enforceable bilateral netting agreement,
RC - simply the net replacement cost across derivative contracts in the netting set, given by the larger of
net portfolio value or zero.
Add-on - is calculated under the Basel I formula:
where
Add-oni - the Add-on for transaction i
NGR - the ratio of the current net replacement cost (RC under full netting) to the current gross
replacement cost (RC under no netting) for all transactions within the netting set.
CCR and Basel II
2. Standardized Approach:
• The standardized method in Basel II was designed for those banks that do not qualify to
model counterparty exposure internally but would like to adopt a more risk-sensitive
approach than the CEM.
where
NCV - the current market value of transactions in the portfolio net the
current market value of collateral assigned to the netting set;
NRPj - the absolute value of net risk position in the hedging set j;
CCFj - the credit conversion factor with respect to the hedging set j, that
converts the net risk position in the hedging set into a PFE measure.
CCR and Basel II
3. Internal Rating-Based Approach
• the most risk-sensitive approach for the exposure at default (EAD) calculation available under
the Basel II framework.
EAD = α × Effective_EPE
where
Effective EPE - the Effective Expected Positive Exposure calculated for each
netting set from the expected exposure (EE) profile,
α - a multiplier.
CCR and Basel II
Calculating EPE
Typically, banks that model exposure internally compute
exposure distributions at a set of future dates {t1, t2 … tK } using
Monte Carlo simulations.
EPE is defined as the average of the EE profile over the first year.
Practically, it is computed as the weighted average of EEK.
CCR and Basel II
There are three main components in calculating the distribution of
netting-set-level or counterparty-level credit exposure:
• Basel III:
the CVA risk capital charge was added
WHY?
During the financial crisis roughly two-thirds of losses
attributed to counterparty credit risk were due to CVA losses
and only about one-third were due to actual defaults.
CCR and Basel III
where:
K - the regulatory multiplier (typically set to 3),
SVaR denotes the stressed VaR calculated with stressed exposures and spread
scenarios coming from a crisis period.
CVA (Basel III)
internal models method:
The CVA is given by:
where:
LGDMKT - the loss given default for the counterparty (1 – recovery),
EEi - the expected (unconditional) exposures at each time,
Si - the counterparty’s spread.
LIMITATIONS TO COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK
MANAGEMENT
Market failures limit CCRM
To assess the question of why CCRM might prove insufficient, it is
useful to examine potential market failures (in a sense of
deviations from a perfectly competitive, full-information economy
that efficiently allocates resources) in the provision of credit.
• agency problems,
• externalities,
• free-rider problems,
• moral hazard,
• and coordination failures.
>>> agency problem