Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Financial Management - Notes MR - Matovu
International Financial Management - Notes MR - Matovu
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
Augustine Matovu
Multinational Corporations are defined as firms that engage in some
form of international business (Jeff Madura, 2018).
Managing an
The commonly accepted goal of an MNC is to maximize
MNC shareholder’s wealth and thus managers are expected to make
decisions that maximize the stock price.
Corporate The Sarbonese Oxely Act (SOX) was enacted in 2002 to ensure
transparency when reporting on productivity and financial
Governance condition on an MNC.
The Act requires firm’s to put in place internal controls that can
easily be monitored by firm managers and board of directors.
Establishing a centralized database of information
Ensuring that all data are reported consistently among
Methods used subsidiaries.
Implementing a system that automatically checks data for unusual
to increase discrepancies relative to norms
internal Speeding up the process by which all departments and
subsidiaries access needed data,
control Making executives more accountable for financial statements by
processes. personally verifying their accuracy.
SOX provided for better transparency and accountability by MNC
executives.
Management
Structure of
an MNC
(Centralized
vs
Decentralized
styles)
Management
Structure of
an MNC
(Centralized
vs
Decentralized
styles)
A centralized management style can reduce agency costs;
it allows managers of the parent to control foreign subsidiaries by
reducing power of subsidiary managers.
A decentralized management style, could result in higher agency
costs;
What Because subsidiary managers may make decisions that fail to
management maximize the value of the entire MNC.
style reduces This style gives more control to managers who are closer to the
subsidiary’s operations and environment.
agency costs? When subsidiary managers are compensated in accordance with
that goal of value maximization, the decentralized management
style may be more effective.
Given the clear trade-offs between centralized and decentralized
management styles, some MNCs attempt to achieve the
advantages of both.
There a number of theories that explain the reasons why firm’s are
Why MNCs motivated to expand internationally:
International
Classical country based theories
Business Modern Firm based theories
Mercantilism
Classical Absolute advantage
Country based Comparative advantage
theories Factor proportions theory
Country similarity
Modern Firm Product life cycle
based theories Global strategic rivalry
Porter’s national competitive advantage
This theory has its roots in the gold standard and thus emphasizes
maximizing exports and limit imports.
This is because between the 16th-18th century countries that
exported increased their gold and silver bullion reserves and
countries that imported had a reduction in bullion reserves thus a
deficit balance of trade.
Mercantilism Economies focusing on mercantilism will subsidies export
industries
This theory introduced challenges such as;
Low domestic consumption and reduction in domestic demand
Trade wars because no country will be willing to let go of its gold
reserves.
Proposed by Adams Smith who observed that countries should
specialize in the production of goods and services where they have
Absolute absolute advantage;
Meaning that countries should concentrate on producing goods
advantage where they meet lower cost
This might be due to technological superiority, resource
endowments, demand patterns and commercial policies in
comparison to another country.
Postulated by David Riccardo, this theory notes that there are
countries that are able to produce particular goods or services at
lower opportunity costs;
Theory of Meaning ability to sale goods or services at lower price and realize
Comparative a greater sales margin than trade partners.
This can be a result of economies of scale that arise from superior
Advantage technology or human skills .
The theory of comparative advantage provides a rationale for
international trade because different countries/ economies or
regions are endowed differently and thus an international reliance
on that kind of advantage by other nations.
In a two-country, two-factor, and two-commodity framework
different countries are endowed with varying proportions of
different factors of production.
Some countries have large populations and large labour resources
and others have large capital.
A country with a large labour force will be able to produce the goods
at a lower cost using a labour intensive mode of production.
Factor Similarly, countries with a large supply of capital will specialize in
proportions goods that involve a capital intensive mode of production.
The former will export its labour intensive goods to the latter and
theory import capital intensive goods from the latter.
Heckscher–Ohlin theorem observes “A capital-abundant country
will export the capital-intensive good, while the labor-abundant
country will export the labor-intensive good."
After the trade, both the countries will have two types of goods at
the least cost.
(contrast with Leontief’s Paradox)
The Leontief paradox, presented by Wassily Leontief in
1951, found that the U.S. (the most capital-abundant country in
the world by any criterion) exported labor-intensive commodities
Factor and imported capital-intensive commodities;
proportions An apparent contradiction with the Heckscher–Ohlin theorem.
Country When a company develops a new product for the local market, the
Similarity firm will later export the product to a country with similar levels of
development after meeting the need of the local market.
theory Reasons: Similarity of location, culture, tastes and preferences
and political and economic interests (after making agreements i.e
EU & EAC)
The theory of perfect markets premised on the assumption that
economic entities maximize value in a world with no transaction
and information costs .
However, in the real world the market is not saturated with
information rather the reality is that of asymmetric information.
Imperfect This is a characteristic of imperfect markets, therefore the
imperfect markets theory for international trade looks at the
Markets reality of markets and posits that;
theory Because information is hard to get by and some economic entities
are privy to more information than others implying information on
efficient technology, resources, Labour and others.
It becomes apparent that for that reason nations trade with one
another and by virtue of the imperfect markets international trade
thrives because it emerges as a result of that imbalance of
information.
The theory proposed by (Vernon, 1966) brings to recognition that
a product goes through the typical phases of introduction, growth,
maturity and decline.
At the introduction stage have low qualities and with no
standardizations, therefore firms export their product to markets
in developed countries.
When the product moves to the growth stage, standardization
increases firms endeavor to cut production costs and rely on
economies of scale;
Product life at this point the firm moves investment to developed countries
cycle theory with moderate income such as those in Europe.
At maturity stage then the firm moves its investment to
developing countries where the product is new without
competition;
this enables the firm to offset the low profit margins from
developed nations were the product is faced with a lot of
competition from firms entering the same line of business.
The Global Strategic Rivalry Theory of international trade was
developed in the 1980s by such economists as Paul Krugman and
Kevin Lancaster
The theory examines the impact on trade flows arising from global
strategic rivalry between Multi-National Corporations.
Global It explores the notion that in order to stay viable, firms should
exploit their competitive advantage globally and try to keep it
Strategic sustainable.
Porter’s
These four factors:
national firm strategy
competitive structure and rivalry
advantage related supporting industries
demand conditions and factor conditions
International trade
Modes of Licensing
Franchising
Conducting Joint ventures
International Strategic alliances
Business Mergers and acquisitions
Foreign Direct Investment
International trade is a relatively conservative approach that can
be used by firms to penetrate markets (by exporting) or to obtain
supplies at a low cost (by importing).
This approach entails minimal risk because the firm does not place
any of its capital at risk.
Joint Ventures Joint ventures often require some degree of DFI, while the other
parties involved in the joint ventures also participate in the
investment.
CureVac (German Biotech) and GSK (British GlaxoSmithKline) are
developing a vaccine that can target multiple coronavirus variants
in a single jab.
Boeing and Lockheed Martin created ULA (United Launch
Alliance) in a 50/50 joint venture to compete with SpaceX
Strategic alliances are agreements between two corporations
designed to co-operate in product development, manufacturing
and marketing of goods and services.
Though the alliance is mutually beneficial for both companies
each company retains its independence.
Strategic The agreement is less complex in comparison to joint ventures
where firms embark on creating a separate business entity.
alliance Its interesting that many successful strategic alliances are formed
by companies that have nothing in common.
Example: Uber’s partnership with Spotify lets Uber riders easily
stream their Spotify playlists whenever they take a ride.
Starbuck and Barnes and Noble
A merger is a consolidation of two companies into a new entity.
The newly formed entity could take on an entirely new name or
retain both names of the former companies.
Mergers are voluntary after mutual agreement of both companies
and normally merging firms are of relatively the same size and
scope.
Mergers and A merger will introduce new ownership and change of
acquisitions management structure.
The rationale of mergers is:
A reduction in operating costs.
Expansion into new markets.
Benefits of economies of scale and scope
Mergers can take the form of horizontal, vertical or conglomerate.
Horizontal merger: Two companies at the same level of
production, marketing or procurement (Glaxo-SmithKline~Glaxo
Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham)
Vertical merger: Two companies at different levels of production,
Mergers and marketing or procurement.
Students’ assignment:
In the Ugandan context, discuss with examples the major mergers
and acquisitions that have been executed in the past two decades
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a direct investment into
production or business in a country by a foreign company; either
by buying out a target company or by expanding operations.
Foreign direct investment differs from portfolio investment, which
is a passive investment in the securities in a foreign country.
It requires a significant degree of influence and control over the
company into which the investment is made.
Foreign Direct Forms of Foreign Direct Investment
Investment Green field investment; is a type of foreign direct investment
(FDI) where a parent company builds its operations in a foreign
country from the ground up.
Brown Field Investment: is when a company or government
entity purchases or leases existing production facilities to launch a
new production activity.
Managers of a firm are meant to make decisions that maximize
the value of the firm or maximize the value of shareholders (not
debt holders at the expense of shareholders).
Valuation for In valuing a domestic company:
a Multi- The firm’s value is given by obtaining the present value of the
firm’s expected cash flows.
National Thus,
Corporation
E(CF$t) is the expected cash flow at the end of period t
N is the number of periods; K is the WACC or RRR
In valuing a multi-national corporation:
Cash flows are normally generated from various countries with
different countries using various currencies;
Valuation for Thus,
a Multi-
National
Corporation where; E(CFjt) is the expected cash flow denominated in a
particular currency
E(Sjt) is the exchange rate of the foreign currency
Example:
XBOX has expected cash flows of $100,000 from local business
within the US. The corporation has 1,000,000 Mexican pesos from
it Mexican Subsidiary at the end of the year. Assuming that the
currency conversion rate is $0.09. Determine the expected dollar
Valuation for cash flow:
a Multi-
National
Corporation
= Cashflow from US operations + Cashflow from Mexico operations
= $100,000 + (1,000,000 x $0.09)
= $100,000 + 90,000
=$190,000
Valuation of an MNC cash flows with multiple periods:
The process described above assumes a single period and thus not
adequate when an MNC has multiple periods in which cash flows
Valuation for are received.
1) Using the same process above to all future cash flows so that
a Multi- they are represented in a single local currency.
National 2) Discount the expected cash flows at the weighted cost of
capital
Corporation 3) Sum the discounted cash flows to estimated the value of the
firm
Example
Microsoft’s makes cash flows of $120,000,000 its Xbox
department operating in Britain forecasts cash flows as follows:
a Multi- 1 50,000,000
2 55,000,000
National 3 60,000,000
Corporation
The corporation has a weighted average cost of capital of 5% and
the dollar conversion rate is 0.8896 euros.
Determine the corporations value inclusive of its department
operating in Britain.
Year Cashflows Cashflows Discounting Discounted
(euros) converted ($) factor (5%) Cashflows
($)
Valuation for
a Multi- 1 50,000,000 44,480,000 0.952 42,344,960
National
Corporation 2 55,000,000 48,928,000 0.907 44,377,696