Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revised Capital Structure
Revised Capital Structure
Financial
deficit
Net
working
capital plus Long-term External
other uses debt and cash flow
equity
15-6
The value of a firm is defined to be the sum of the
value of the firm’s debt and the firm’s equity.
V=B+S
Current Proposed
Assets $20,000 $20,000
Debt $0 $8,000
Equity $20,000 $12,000
Debt/Equity ratio 0.00 2/3
Interest rate n/a 8%
Shares outstanding 400 240
Share price $50 $50
15-9
Recession Expected Expansion
EBIT $1,000 $2,000 $3,000
Interest 0 0 0
Net income $1,000 $2,000 $3,000
EPS $2.50 $5.00 $7.50
ROA 5% 10% 15%
ROE 5% 10% 15%
Current Shares Outstanding = 400 shares
10.00 Debt
8.00 No Debt
point to debt
4.00
2.00
0.00
1,000 2,000 3,000
(2.00) Disadvantage EBIT in dollars, no taxes
to debt
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
15-12
A firm has capital structure exclusively comprising of ordinary
shares amounting to Rs 10,00,000. The firm now wishes to raise
additional Rs 10,00,000 for expansion. The firm has four
alternative financial plans:
15-13
Q4. Franklin corporation is comparing two different capital
structures, an all-equity plan (Plan 1) and a levered plan (Plan
2). Under Plan 1, the company would have 315,000 shares of
stock outstanding. Under plan 2, there would be 225,000
shares of stock outstanding and $4.14 million in debt
outstanding. The interest rate on the debt is 10% and there are
no taxes.
a.If EBIT is $750,000, which plan would result in the higher EPS?
b.If EBIT is $1750,000, which plan would result in the higher
EPS?
c.What is the Break-even EBIT?
15-14
Q6. Kolby Corp. is comparing two different capital structures.
Plan 1 would result in 1300 shares of stock and $80640 debt.
Plan 2 would result in 2900 shares of stock and $19200 in
debt. The interest rate on the debt is 10 percent.
15-15
Homogeneous Expectations
Homogeneous Business Risk Classes
Perpetual Cash Flows
Perfect Capital Markets:
◦ Perfect competition
◦ Firms and investors can borrow/lend at the same rate
◦ Equal access to all relevant information
◦ No transaction costs
◦ No taxes
B $800
Our personal debt-equity ratio is: 23
S $ 1, 2 0 0
15-17
RecessionExpected Expansion
EPS of Levered Firm $1.50 $5.67 $9.83
Earnings for 24 shares$36 $136 $236
Plus interest on $800 (8%)$64 $64 $64
Net Profits $100 $200 $300
ROE (Net Profits / $2,000) 5% 10% 15%
Buying 24 shares of an otherwise identical levered
firm along with some of the firm’s debt gets us to the
ROE of the unlevered firm.
This is the fundamental insight of M&M
VL = VU + TC B = $570
15-22
All-equity firm Levered firm
S G S G
The levered firm pays less in taxes than does the all-equity firm.
Thus, the sum of the debt plus the equity of the levered firm is
greater than the equity of the unlevered firm.
This is how cutting the pie differently can make the pie “larger.”
-the government takes a smaller slice of the pie!
B
RS R0 (R 0 R B )
SL
15-29
There is a trade-off between the tax advantage of
debt and the costs of financial distress.
It is difficult to express this with a precise and
rigorous formula.
0 Debt (B)
B *
L G
15-35
Theory stating that firms prefer to issue debt rather
than equity if internal financing is insufficient.
◦ Rule 1
Use internal financing first
◦ Rule 2
Issue debt next, new equity last
The pecking-order theory is at odds with the tradeoff
theory:
◦ There is no target D/E ratio
◦ Profitable firms use less debt
◦ Companies like financial slack
Textiles 74.34%
Construction 68.52%
Metals & metal products 59.42%
Hotels & tourism 56.03%
Medium Leverage
Chemical 46.34%
Transport/Automobile 45.69%
Machinery 42.31%
Low Leverage
Footwear 26.83%