WP5

Vienna, 6 March 2017

WP5.1 - WP5.4
Contents
SWP 5.1
• Results
• Overview vessels
• TNO + database
• Multronic
• BAW
• NAVROM
• Outlook to deliverables D5.7 & D5.8 & D5.13
SWP 5.4
• End user feedback
• Update of ENAT tool
• Pilots
3 | Prominent Internal Presentation 24 February 2017
Raw data for SEMS
 Processed data
- Arese: measured NOx

- Symphonie:
- Simulated after cat Nox using
engine specs and temperature
- Unknown: broken gps signal
- Monika Deymann speed profile
Extensive process when installing equipment on board

For getting approval and making the electronic and physical

connections many parties are involved, such as:
• The shipyard
• Company doing the maintenance
• Engine manufacturer
• Electrical systems supplies
• Fuel consumption and after treatment system supplier
• Depth measurement supplier
• Cooperation or client needs to agree in some cases
• Type of electronic signals vary

 standard electronic interface is desirable for the future

 Vessel overview
Red: measurements not yet available
Black: up & running
Load Rounded power Number of Power Number of
Ship NameVessel ID Operation area Cargo Length capacity Drivetrain features main engine engines generator generators
DesmarVessel 1_Dry Bulk_67m Belgium and Netherlands Dry Bulk 67 900 CCNR 2 550 1    

Baden Wurttemberg Vessel 2_Dry Bulk_105m Rhine and Neckar Dry Bulk 105 2500 CCNR 2 1150 1    
1250 + 385 e-
Nadorias*Vessel 3_Container_110m Rotterdam – Groningen (NL) Containers 110 3300 CCNR 2 + Hybrid diesel-electric motor 1 220 2
FidesVessel 4_Container_110m Rotterdam – Groningen (NL) Containers 110 3300 CCNR 2 + SCR 1250 1  
Aqua-MyraVessel 5_Container_110m Antwerp - Rotterdam Containers 110 3200 CCNR 1 + SCR / DPF 1500 1 70 2
JuraVessel 6_Container_135m Antwerp – Rotterdam - Cologne Containers 135 5200 CCNR 1/2 + SCR 1050 2  
Monika DeymannVessel 7_Container_135m Antwerp to Mainz Containers 135 5600 CCNR 2 1150 2  
AreseVessel 8_Dry Bulk_135m Antwerp - Rotterdam + Rhine + Danube Dry Bulk 135 4400 CCNR 2 850 2 56 1
DeltaVessel 9_Dry Cargo_110m Rhine Dry Cargo 110 3100 CCNR 1/2 + SCR 1600 1   3

IntermezzoVessel 10_Liquid Bulk_110m Antwerp – Rotterdam Liquid Bulk 110 3200 CCNR 1/2 + SCR / DPF 1250 1    
AtlantisVessel 11_Liquid Bulk_135m Belgium and Netherlands Liquid Bulk 135 5800 CCNR 1 + SCR 1100 2 85.6 1
Anina and Rovinari 8 Vessel 12_Push boat_300 kW Danube Push Boat 20 - ? 300 2 36 1
DonauVessel 13_Push boat_750 kW FARAG + Rhine Push Boat 23 - CCNR 2 750 2 65 1
Mercur 205 Vessel 14_Push boat_950 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 950 2 70 2
Mercur 206 Vessel 15_Push boat_950 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 950 2 70 2
Mercur 207 Vessel 16_Push boat_950 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 950 2 77 2
Vessel 17_Push boat_1250
Mercur 301 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 1250 2 77 2
Vessel 18_Push boat_1250
Mercur 303 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 1250 2 77 2
Vessel 19_Push boat_1250
Mercur 304 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 1250 2 77 2
Vessel 20_Push boat_1250
Mercur 305 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 1250 2 77 2
Vessel 21_Push boat_1250
Mercur 306 kW Danube Push Boat 35 - ? 1250 2 77 2
Vessel 22_Push boat_1350
Veerhaven XI kW NL + Rhine Push Boat 40 - CCNR 2 1350 3 221 2
SymphonieVessel 23_Passenger_110m Rhine Passengers 110 - ? 450 3    

*Nadorias: SEMS is installed but status unclear due to a fire onboard of the vessel
** Borelli was to uncertain to include in the table
Arese: 135m, ARA + Rhine + Danube Aqua Myra

Nadorias: diesel-electric hybrid

Adriana: 85 m, ARA
 Environmental Performance Monitoring
examples NOx presentation
One hour averages during 48 hrs, Engine ~ 1500 kW

Low power high power

Container ship, Rhine

SWP 5.4
• End user feedback
• Update of ENAT tool
• Pilots
 SWP 5.4: Pilot energy efficient navigation
• Current status of the tasks and the pilots including
• The on-shore tool = the on-board tool without real
time info or GPS use
• The on-board tool
• 1st version ready and reported in D5.4 & D5.5
 SWP 5.4: Pilot energy efficient navigation
• Current status of the tasks and the pilots including
• The on-shore tool = the on-board tool without real
time info or GPS use
• The on-board tool
• 1st version ready and reported in D5.4 & D5.5
• 2nd version anticipated
• Solve some bugs
• Feedback mid term review
• Feedback skippers (next slide)
 SWP 5.4: Pilot energy efficient navigation
• Current status of the tasks and the pilots including
• The on-shore tool = the on-board tool without real
time info or GPS use
• The on-board tool
• 1st version ready and reported in D5.4 & D5.5
• 2nd version anticipated
• Solve some bugs
• Feedback mid term review
• Feedback skippers (next slide)
SWP 5.4: Consulting skippers
Cons:
• Advice of engine speed is too detailed
• They already apply a similar sailing strategy as advised
by the tool
• There is a vast number of practical issues that are not
implemented:
• Interaction with other traffic.
• Locks, lock times
• Schedules imposed by the office for delivery
times that do not allow efficiency considerations
Pros:
• Good working, intuitive interface.
• 1D is better than 2D, considering safety and already
optimized inner/outer bend use.
• Interesting for newer skippers with little experience
• Real time advice may not be necessary
Actions meeting Sept-2016 Rotterdam
Next steps with navigation tool, defined in September:
• Validation with measurements on German & Dutch Ships: to do or: in
progress: sailing resistance (also) to be based on on-board monitoring is
necessary to obtain reasonable accuracy.
• Planning based on arrival time, input as Rhine km as well: 2nd sprint
• easier iteration / re-planning: 2nd sprint
• Speed up model: done
• Flexible section length: not planned
• Adding Dutch Rhine(“Waal”)
• Include Upper Danube, if validation data available: received from VIADONAU,
for sprint 3… to be considered (or not planned)
• Danube water depth prediction based on Corabia gauge and (historic)
measurements on NAVRON pushers - to be considered
SWP 5.4: Pilot energy efficient navigation

We are considering the following adaptations of the tool:

• Choose arrival time in stead of speed
• Rounding the speed advice to 50 rpm steps
• This would generally mean a constant rpm advice for the entire
trip ahead…
• More information on the screen about the water way and sailing
information during the trip. Such as: local average SOG, current, depth
• Arrival time would still be updated based on deviations and possible
delays
• Possibly a new speed advice could be given, in order to meet the
original arrival time
Pilots
• Boarding the Symphonie
• This would be very efficient
• What has to be done to achieve this?
• Other suggestions?