Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Non-Conformances / Document Control: Draakhine Chemical Pathology Nhls Tygerberg Lab Management Workshop June 4-6 2019
Non-Conformances / Document Control: Draakhine Chemical Pathology Nhls Tygerberg Lab Management Workshop June 4-6 2019
Non-Conformances / Document Control: Draakhine Chemical Pathology Nhls Tygerberg Lab Management Workshop June 4-6 2019
Control
Dr A A Khine
Chemical Pathology
NHLS TYGERBERG
Lab Management Workshop
June 4-6 2019
Non-conformance in medical laboratory
• A failure to conform to accepted standards or SOP
• Non-conformance analysis involves the recognition of
deviations, recording immediate corrective action, finding
root causes and implementing preventive action.
• Critical component of quality policy and included in quality
manual
• This is part of (ISO) 15189:2012, thus laboratory accreditation
Major:
NCs that pose immediate or imminent danger in patient care
Minor:
no direct effect on patient care or no immediate or imminent
danger but in long term may pose indirect danger to patients or
business
Give examples
Where and Why do NCs occur?
Machines Breakdowns
Out of
Preparation Reagents and stock
centrifugation consumables Expiries
Contamina
tions
Loss
Lack of training
Lack of discipline
Managers
SOPs Lack of monitoring
LSS QC
Operators
Lack of clarity
Lack of
consequences
Samples Reporting
customers
How NCs are picked up
1. Checking – who is checking?
– After checking and finding something wrong, do
you report it? Does everyone report it?
2. Reporting- who is reporting?
– Incidence reporting
– Complaint reporting
– Audit reporting
3. NC in a process -> who was involved?
4. Reporting a NC or reporting a person? Can
we separate them?
Closure of NC
• Who must close it?
• How to close it?
– Complete the NHLS NC form
– All 3 sections (identification and description of NC,
CA, RTA, PA)
– Monitoring of PA ???
Sample non-conformance Form
NON-CONFORMANCE
REPORT
Requirement/ Clause No: SANAS F88-03: SANAS F95-02: NCR Rating: Major Minor
Details of Non-conformance:
Target date for completion: ___ / ___ / ____ Actual date completed: ___ / ____ / _______
The above finding was most likely a result of a deficiency in the area indicated below; and preventative action/s
must be directed to this area:-
Signed: __________________________
(Lab Supervisor)
Signed: ___________________________
(Lab Supervisor)
NCR Close out date: ___ / ___ / _____ Effective: Y N Signed: ____________________________
(Auditor)
Monitor CA
PA
CAPA process is a cycle
1. Define what will be considered as NC and what is major and what
is minor (problems/errors/deviations)
2. Major or minor (consult with pathologists re: impact on patient)
3. Define CA for each NC (do this when that happens- as far as one
can predict) as it may require fast response
1. Establish a system (or tools) to identify NCs (must be in a SOP)
2. Register all NCs either manually in log books or electronically using standard form
3. Complete the CA taken and discuss with relevant parties involved if CA was appropriate
and adequate or not
4. Investigate root cause(s)- many times multiple causes- analyze information thoroughly
and without BIAS
5. Provide feedback to staff involved in NC
6. Discuss PA with staff for implementation
7. Observe for recurring problem. If recur, CA and look for root causes why
8. Review all NCs logged annually or bi-annually
9. Redefine NCs
10.Adjust CAPA
11.Staff feedback
Root causes analysis
• Analysis of cause and effect
Ishikawa diagrams
Trend analysis: Internal audits
Periodic examination of non-conformances to find and
document repeated non-conformances
• not heard
• misunderstood
• quickly forgotten
• difficult to follow
What makes a good document?
• Written clearly and concisely
• User-friendly style
• Explicit and accurate
• Maintained to stay up to date
• Accessible to all staff
Documents are a reflection of the
laboratory’s organisation and its
quality management.
• Distribution problems