Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Antibacterial Potential of Biologically Synthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Against Gram-Negative Bacteria
Antibacterial Potential of Biologically Synthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Against Gram-Negative Bacteria
Department of Microbiology
Government College University, Faisalabad
Introduction
Antibiotics the most important medical innovations in human history. The introduction of a
broad range of antibiotics drastically reduced the morbidity and mortality from infectious
diseases over the last century
However, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, which has been widely documented to
worsen clinical outcomes and increase the economic burden of infectious diseases
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are becoming a growing public health crisis and make
many healthcare-associated infections difficult to treat with current antibiotics
Nanoparticles as alternatives
(Lee et al 2019)
Nanoparticles
(Nguyen et al 2018)
Biologically synthesized MgO NPs
Biologically synthesized NPs are far superior, in several ways, to the chemically synthesized NPs.
Although the chemical synthesis can produce large quantities of nanoparticles with a defined size
and shape in a relatively short time, they are complicated, costly, and inefficient and produce
hazardous toxic wastes that are harmful, not only to the environment but also to human health.
There are several reports on the preparation of MgO NPs using the plants and synthesis of MgO NP
from bacterial and fungal sources is missing in literature
(Iravani et al 2016)
Objectives
Clinical isolates were obtained from the Department of Microbiology, Government College
University Faisalabad
To check the morphological characteristics and confirmation of these isolates API20E and
several biochemical tests were performed
Catalase
Oxidase
Citrate
Urease
Triple sugar iron agar
Characterization of nanoparticles
For the characterization of biologically synthesized MgO NPs, various analytical tools were
used
UV-Visible spectroscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
Antibacterial susceptibility testing
To check the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of isolates, the standard Kirby disc diffusion
method for a list of antimicrobial agents followed by determination of MIC for ciprofloxacin
was used.
Antibacterial activities of MgO nanoparticles
UV-Vis spectroscopy
Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy
0.600
0.500
0.400
Ansorbance
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 450.0 500.0 550.0 600.0 650.0
Wavelength (nm)
Scanning electron microscopy
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile for Escherichia coli and
Klebsiella Pneumoniae
Antimicrobial Agents
Bacterial
species
AMP PRL AMC ATM SAM TZP CRO CTX CAZ FEP IPM MEM AK CN TOB CIP LEV SXT DO
E. coli R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R S
K. Pneumoniae R R R R R R R R R R R R R R S R R R R
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Acinetobacter baumannii and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
Antimicrobial Agents
Bacterial species
AMP PRL AMC ATM SAM TZP CRO CTX CAZ FEP IPM MEM AK CN TOB CIP LEV SXT DO
Acinetobacter
R R R R R R R R R R R S R S R R R R
baumannii
Pseudomonas
R R R R R R NT NT R R S S R R R R R NT NT
aeruginosa
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Salmonella enterica and Proteus
mirabilis strains
Antimicrobial Agents
Bacterial species
AZM
AMP PRL AMC TZP CRO CTX FEP IPM MEM AK CN TOB CIP LEV SXT DO
S
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi R NT R R R R R S S NT NT NT R R R R
NT
Proteus mirabilis R R R R NT NT R R R S S S R R R R
MIC and MBC for the clinical isolates (Ciprofloxacin)
A. baumannii 4 32 128
P. aeruginosa 2 8 16
E. coli 1 16 64
K. pneumoniae 1 32 64
P. mirabilis 1 8 32
S. Typhi 1 8 16
Zone of Inhibition of NPs against bacterial strains by Agar well diffusion method
MIC (µg/ml)
Bacteria Agents FIC FICI Interpretation
Alone Combination
CIP 32 16 0.5
A. baumannii 0.75 Partial synergistic
NP 50 12.5 0.25
CIP 8 4 0.5
P. aeruginosa 0.75 Partial synergistic
NP 100 25 0.25
CIP 16 4 0.25
E. coli 0.5 Synergistic
NP 50 12.5 0.25
CIP 32 8 0.25
K. pneumoniae 0.75 Partial synergistic
NP 50 25 0.5
CIP 8 2 0.25
P. mirabilis 0.5 Synergistic
NP 100 25 0.25
CIP 16 4 0.25
S. Typhi 0.5 Synergistic
NP 100 25 0.25
Time kill Assay
Time kill Assay
Time kill Assay
Antioxidant activity
1.4
1.2
0.8
Absorbance
NP (50 μg/mL )
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
505.0 510.0 515.0 520.0 525.0 530.0 535.0 540.0 545.0 550.0
Wavelength (nm)
Conclusions
The results have shown that MgO were effective against P. aeruginosa, S. enterica, and P. mirabilis
with 100 μg/ml whereas and for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii at 50 μg/ml
concentrations.
The MBC for P. aeruginosa, S. enterica, and P. mirabilis were 200 μg/ml, and 100 μg/ml for E. coli,
K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii.
The synergetic effect of ciprofloxacin and MgO NPs was observed for E. coli, P. mirabilis and S.
Typhi whereas a partial synergistic effect for A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae.
MgO NPs also possess good antioxidants activities
The MgO NPs can used as potential therapeutic agents against the infections caused by MDR
bacterial pathogens
References
Friedman ND, Temkin E, Carmeli Y. The negative impact of antibiotic resistance. Clinical
Microbiology and Infection. 2016;22(5):416-22.
Lee NY, Ko WC, Hsueh PR. Nanoparticles in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-
resistant organisms. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2019;10:1153.
Wang L, Hu C, Shao L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects
for the future. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1227.
Nguyen NY, Grelling N, Wetteland CL, Rosario R, Liu H. Antimicrobial activities and mechanisms
of magnesium oxide nanoparticles (nMgO) against pathogenic bacteria, yeasts, and biofilms.
Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1-23.
Iravani S, Korbekandi H, Mirmohammadi SV, Zolfaghari B. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles:
chemical, physical and biological methods. Research in pharmaceutical sciences. 2014
Nov;9(6):385.