1. The document discusses a case from the European Commission regarding Google's search engine practices.
2. Google's search engine offers both general search results selected based on general criteria as well as specialized search results tailored to specific queries.
3. The General Court found that by favoring its own comparison shopping service on its general search pages through more prominent display and positioning, while relegating results from competing services, Google departed from competition on merits.
Antitrust Commission Fines Google 2.42 Billion For Abusing Dominance As Search Engine by Giving Illegal Advantage To Own Comparison Shopping Service - Factsheet
1. The document discusses a case from the European Commission regarding Google's search engine practices.
2. Google's search engine offers both general search results selected based on general criteria as well as specialized search results tailored to specific queries.
3. The General Court found that by favoring its own comparison shopping service on its general search pages through more prominent display and positioning, while relegating results from competing services, Google departed from competition on merits.
1. The document discusses a case from the European Commission regarding Google's search engine practices.
2. Google's search engine offers both general search results selected based on general criteria as well as specialized search results tailored to specific queries.
3. The General Court found that by favoring its own comparison shopping service on its general search pages through more prominent display and positioning, while relegating results from competing services, Google departed from competition on merits.
1. The document discusses a case from the European Commission regarding Google's search engine practices.
2. Google's search engine offers both general search results selected based on general criteria as well as specialized search results tailored to specific queries.
3. The General Court found that by favoring its own comparison shopping service on its general search pages through more prominent display and positioning, while relegating results from competing services, Google departed from competition on merits.
Commission Google’s search engine offers two type of search result 1. General Search Engine
Selected according to general criteria and without
the websites to which they link paying google to appear 2. Specialized search engine selected according to a specialized logic for the particular type of search carried out. They can appear alongside general search results on the general results page, alone on a specialized results page or after links in certain areas of Google’s general results page have been activated. Note: both the General and Specialized search pages can contain “natural” results as well as ”ads”. The display of ads is linked to payment commitments entered into by advertisers at auctions. Is there a dominant undertaking favoring the display of results from it specialized search service? The General Court However, the General Court finds that, by considers that an favoring its own comparison shopping undertaking’s dominant service on its general results pages position alone, even through more favorable display and one on the scale of positioning, while relegating the results Google’s, is not a from competing comparison services in ground of criticism of the undertaking those pages by means of ranking concerned, even if it is algorithms, Google departed from planning to expand into competition on the merits. a neighbouring market. The following are the circumstances that lead to a weakening of competition on the market
(1) the importance of the traffic generated by Google’s general search
engine for comparison shopping services;
(2) the behavior of users, who typically concentrate on the first few results;
(3) the large proportion of ‘diverted’ traffic in the traffic of comparison
shopping services and the fact that it cannot be effectively replaced The General Court also notes that, given the universal vocation of Google’s general search engine, which is designed to index results containing any possible content, the promotion on Google’s results pages of only one type of specialized result, namely its own, involves a certain form of abnormality. A general search engine is infrastructure that is, in principle, open, the rationale and value of which lie in its capacity to be open to results from external (third-party) sources and to display those sources, which enrich and enhance the credibility of the search engine. the General Court finds that Google’s differentiated treatment is based on the origin of the results, that is, whether they come from its own comparison shopping service or from competing services. The General Court thus rules that, in reality, Google favors its own comparison shopping service over competing services, rather than a better result over another result. The General Court notes that even if the results from competing comparison shopping services were more relevant, they could never receive the same treatment as results from Google’s comparison shopping service in terms of their positioning or their display.
Antitrust Commission Fines Google 2.42 Billion For Abusing Dominance As Search Engine by Giving Illegal Advantage To Own Comparison Shopping Service - Factsheet