Understanding How Language Is Represented and Processed in The Brain

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Language and the Brain

Understanding how language is


represented and processed in the
brain
Psycholinguisics

 The study of acquisition, storage,


comprehension and production of
language
 Neurolinguistics: branch of
psycholinguistics dealing with language
and the brain
Cerebral cortex
 Cerebral cortex: A one-quarter-inch thick
membrane covering the brain
– consciousness, thinking, learning, emotions,
language
– Constitutes the difference between humans and
other animals
 Corpus callosum: bundle of nerve fibers that
connects the brain’s right and left hemispheres
LATERALIZATION
Each hemisphere specializes in diff. cognitive
functions (referred to as lateralization)
 RIGHT  LEFT
HEMISPHERE HEMISPHERE
 holistic reasoning  analytic reasoning
 music processing  temporal ordering
 processing of non-  arithmetic
linguistic sounds  language processing
 visual, spatial
processing
Lateralization (Cont’d)
Most right-handers
left-hemisphere dominance for language
Left-handers
generally less lateralized for language
Evidence of Lateralization:
Language damage far more likely following left-hemisphere
damage (70% vs. 1%)
Dichotic listening test
Split-brain patients
Dichotic listening test

two three

Which one do you


think is more
accurately reported?

• Two different stimuli are presented simultaneously


through earphones to the left and right ears
• The listeners are asked to say what they hear
Contralateralization

 The connection between

R sensory information

L sensory information
the brain and the body are
almost completely
contralateral

two three
The right ear advantage (REA)
nonlinguistic language
sound processing
processing
R L
Brain

R ear L ear

two three

 Listeners can identify linguistic stimuli more


accurately when presented to their right ear.
BONES AND MUSCLES OF THE HEAD
The left ear advantage
nonlinguistic language
sound processing
processing
R L
Brain

R ear L ear

Zzzz Ha
Riiing!
ha ha

Listeners can identify nonlinguistic stimuli more accurately when


presented to their left ear.
BONES AND MUSCLES OF THE HEAD
Split brain experiments

 The hemispheres of the brain are


connected by the corpus callosum
 Corpus callosum severed to prevent
severe seizures
 In these experiments, patients are
blindfolded and an object (let’s say a
key) is placed in their right or left hand
Split-brain patients & language

key in
left hand

L R Brain
Split-brain patients & language

key in
right
hand

L R Brain
Split Brain Experiments
 KEY IN RIGHT  KEY IN LEFT HAND
HAND – Patient unable to
– Patient can name name object
object
Language centers
Integrates visual &
Speech production
auditory info
Syntactic info
Crucial for reading
Broca’s area
Angular gyrus

Wernicke’s area
Language comprehension
Lexicon
BACK
FRONT
Language Disorders

 A damage to one of these areas will


affect the ability to produce/perceive
language
– Aphasia:
– Broca’s Aphasia
– Wernicke’s Aphasia
Broca’s area
 Involved in speech production
– motor programming for articulation
 Involved in morphosyntactic analysis
– Inflection
– Structural complexity
 Add grammatical refinements to content words
selected in Wernicke’s area.
(Akmajian et al. 2001: p. 543)
Sample speech: Broca’s
aphasia
•Examiner: Tell me, what did you do
before you retired?
•Aphasic: Uh, uh, uh, pub, par, partender,
no.
•Examiner: Carpenter?
•Aphasic: (Nodding to signal yes)
Carpenter, tuh, tuh, twenty
year.
Broca’s Aphasia and
Syntactic Disorder
 Broca’s aphasics tend to omit inflectional morphemes
(-ing, -ed, -en, -s)—necessary for syntax
 Broca’s aphasics can’t determine grammaticality in
following sentences:
– The boy ate it up.
– * The boy ate up it.
– * Boy ate it up.
– The boy ate up the cake.
Broca’s Aphasia and
Syntactic Disorder
 a. The mouse was chased by the cat.
 b. The cat was chased by the mouse
 Broca’s aphasiacs tend to interpret (a)
correctly, but they tend to give (b) the
same interpretation as (a)
 Our understanding of (a) and (b) is
driven by syntax; a Broca’s aphasiac’s
understanding is driven by semantics.
Wernicke’s area
 Essential to language comprehension
 Involved in selection/evaluation of content
words (contained in lexicon)
(Akmajian et al. 2001: p. 544)

Sample speech: Wernicke’s aphasia


 Examiner: Do you like it here in Kansas City?
 Aphasic: Yes, I am.
 Examiner: I’d like to have you tell me
something about your problem.
 Aphasic: Yes, I, ugh, can’t hill all of my
way. I can’t talk all of the things I do, and part of the
part I can go alright, but I can’t tell from the other
people. I usually most of my things. I know what can I
talk and know what they are, but I can’t always come
back even though I know they should be in, and I
know should something eely I should know what I’m
doing...
Wernicke’s aphasia

 Fluent, but their speech doesn’t make


any sense.

You might also like