Peter Fowler Introduction To Risk Management Presentation Handout 2014

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Introduction to Risk Management

26 September 2014
Peter Fowler CPPD
“There are “known knowns”. [These are things we
know that we know.]
There are “known unknowns”. [That is to say, there
are things that we know we don't know.]
But there are also “unknown unknowns”. [There are
things we don't know we don't know.]”
Donald Rumsfeld (Feb 12, 2002)

“The major difference between a thing that might go


wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is
that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes
wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or
repair.”
Douglas Adams in Mostly Harmless (the fifth book in the Hitchhiker's Guide
to the Galaxy trilogy)
Risk Management Definitions
• Uncertainty - changing circumstances or situation

• Risk - effect of uncertainty on objectives

• Opportunity - the positive impact on objectives

• Issue - an event that has happened or will happen


Types of Risk Management
• Safety risk management
• Insurance risk management
• Financial (Investment) risk management
• Project risk management
• Business risk management
• Information risk management
Tasmanian Government Information Security Policy
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Policy is to provide a consistent approach to managing
information security risks across Government.
2. Scope
This Policy applies to Tasmanian Government agencies as custodians of information
on behalf of the Crown.
3. Policy Principles
This Policy is based upon the following information security policy principles:
• Availability:  information is accessible and usable to authorised entities.
• Integrity:  the accuracy and completeness of information is protected.
• Confidentiality:  information is not made available or disclosed to unauthorised individuals,
entities or processes.
• Proportionality:  measures to protect information are relative to the risk of loss or failure of
availability, integrity and confidentiality.
Tasmanian Government Information Security Policy
Manual
• Information security risks are threats or vulnerabilities that introduce
uncertainty regarding the availability, confidentiality or integrity of
information.
• Structured risk assessments help to prioritise risks and implement
appropriate risk management procedures.
• Information security risk management can be undertaken as part of a
broader agency risk management approach.
• Each agency MUST identify, quantify and prioritise risks against risk
acceptance criteria and determine appropriate controls to protect
against risks.
After completing a risk assessment

there may be residual information security risks where the agency has:
• elected to accept a risk by doing nothing, or
• adopted a mitigation strategy that does not completely eliminate a
risk.
Process from AS/NZS ISO 31000: 2009
Common failures when managing risks
• Not establishing the context:
• Misunderstand organisational attitudes and risk appetite

• Risk attitude. Organization's approach to assess and eventually


pursue, retain, take or turn away from risk
• Risk appetite. The amount and type of risk that an organisation is
willing to pursue or retain
Source: ISO GUIDE 73: 2009 Risk management — Vocabulary
Common failures when managing risks
• Not establishing the context:
• Misunderstand organisational attitudes and risk appetite

• Not focussing on the appropriate risks (business efficiency vs information


security)
• Business efficiency risk – Information cannot be located quickly as a
result of poor categorisation resulting in more time/ resources
required to find records.
• Information security risk. Information cannot be located as a result of
poor file categorisation resulting in not finding important records.
Common failures when managing risks
• Consequence – If the event occurs what will the consequence be:
• Not establishing the context:
• Critical
• High
• Misunderstand organisational attitudes and risk appetite
• Medium But what do these terms mean?
•• Low
Not focussing on the appropriate risks (business efficiency vs information
• Very low
security
• Likelihood - What is the likelihood that the event will occur and result in the
• Inappropriate
consequence measures used for the analysis
indicated:
• Almost certain
• Likely
• As likely as not But what do these terms mean?
• Possible
• unlikely
Common failures when managing risks
1.• Not
Inappropriate
establishingfile
thecategorisation
context:
2. Cannot find board meeting minutes
• Misunderstand organisational attitudes and risk appetite
State the full story: What could happen, why could it happen (cause)
and •what would the
Not focussing on result be
the appropriate risks (business efficiency vs information
security
“Board meeting minutes cannot be located as a result of poor file
categorisation resulting
• Inappropriate in disputed
measures decisions
used for the analysis having to be reversed”

• Generalisation of risk statements (leads to misunderstanding)


Common failures when managing risks
1.• Not
Ensure board meeting
establishing minutes are categorised appropriately
the context:
• Misunderstand
Would that organisational
stop people attitudes and risk incorrectly
categorising appetite

• Not focussing on the appropriate risks (business efficiency vs information


2. Provide
securitytraining for staff on board meeting minute categorisation
Only appropriate
• Inappropriate if not
measures used already
for the analysisbeing done!

• Generalisation of risk statements (leads to misunderstanding)


• Fake treatment (either won’t mean anything or not followed through)
Questions?
Introduction to Risk Management
26 September 2014
Peter Fowler CPPD

You might also like