Analysis Report – Analytics Challenge

Julián David Rojas Castaño

Bogotá D.C., Colombia – 2020

Part 1. Metrics design

Variables:
• Zones with a high quantity of couriers in peak hours.
• Zones with a low quantity of couriers in peak hours.
• Quantity of orders in zones with high quantity of couriers in peak hours.
• Quantity of orders in zones with low quantity of couriers in peak hours.
• Quantity of couriers in zones with high quantity of orders in peak hours.
• Quantity of couriers in zones with low quantity of orders in peak hours.

Metrics:
•
•

Graphic 1. Representation of the problem

Choose one small city.
Determine zones with high and low quantity of couriers in
peak hours.
Check the performance for one week.
It is important to have a contingency plan.
Table 1. Table to track Rappi’s new optimization model

We need to take into account the following conditions and

ensure them:
 
• Deployment cost
• Deployment time
• Scalability
• Faults
• Integration with the couriers Table 2. Table to compare Rappi’s new optimization model vs old one
Part 3. Data analysis

9.689 orders were not taken by any courier, which

is the 8% of the total orders (125.549).

Plot 1. Taken vs non-taken orders

Saturday is the day of all the week with the

highest value (2.090-21.5%) and also Friday has
the highest value (1.630-16.8%) within labor days
(Monday to Friday).

Plot 2. Day vs non-taken orders

𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔=𝟗 𝒙 𝟗𝒙 𝟑=𝟐𝟒𝟑
 Conclusions
It is possible to create an iterative and scalable method to
know with a certainty percentage if the courier will take an
order or not.

When the dataset size is bigger and you add more

variables to the method, the certainty percentage will be
closer to reality.