Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Health Information System (HIS) : Kassahun D
Health Information System (HIS) : Kassahun D
Kassahun D.
Learning Objectives
1. Data generation,
2. Compilation,
3. Analysis and synthesis
4. Communication and use
Goal of health information systems
Info-needs / indicators
Resources
Data Collection
Data Processing
Organizational
Data Analysis
Rules
USE OF INFORMATION
FOR DECISION-MAKING
RHIS objectives and goals
GOAL:
Contribute to evidence-based decision-making in the
health sector.
OBJECTIVES:
1.To generate quality information.
2.To use information for action.
Basic requirements for RHIS
Adequate staffing.
Communications equipment.
14
15
RHIS Performance Diagnostic Tool
17
Organizational factors
Resources.
Structure of the health system.
Roles and responsibilities.
Organizational culture.
Example:
•Political or other costs to making the decision.
•Clear roles and responsibilities related to decision-making.
Technical factors
• Standard indicators.
• User-friendly format for reporting.
• Trained people.
• Timely data availability.
• Appropriate technology.
• Data collection forms.
Example:
User-friendly data collection form
User friendly interface
19
Behavioral factors
• Motivation.
• Attitudes and values.
• Confidence.
• Sense of responsibility.
Example:
•Feeling of confidence to make decisions.
•Empowerment.
•Individual political or other costs to making the decision.
•Does my decision matter?
Linking PRISM Tools to PRISM Conceptual Model
RHIS determinants
Technical factors: Performance Diagnostic and
•Complexity of reporting Electronic RHIS Assessment RHIS Performance
forms, procedures Tools Diagnostic Tool
•HIS design
•Computer software Behavioral factors:
•Information technology •Level of knowledge of
complexity RHIS processes:
content of HIS forms •Data collection
•Data quality checking •Data transmission Improved RHIS
skills •Data processing performance Improved Improved
•Problem-solving for HIS •Data analysis •Data quality
tasks
health system health
•Data quality check
•Competence in HIS performance status
•Feedback
Organizational factors: tasks
Critical management •Confidence levels for •Information use
functions & information HIS tasks
needs •Motivation
•Governance
•Planning
•Training
•Supervision
•Quality MAT
•Finance Overview Tool
• Promotion of a culture of
information OBAT
• Availability of resources
Facility/Office Checklist
21
Application of the PRISM Tools
Tools Levels of application
1 RHIS Overview Tool Mainly at national level, but can be used
at subnational levels
2 RHIS Performance Diagnostic Tool Health facility and district or higher levels
(Data Quality & Use of Information)
• PRISM Toolkit
https://www.measureevaluation.org/prism
HMIS in Ethiopia
Health Management Information System (HMIS)
Before 2008 G. C
The health sector didn’t have a standardized HMIS:
There were no:
Standardized set of core indicators, and
Standardized recording and
Reporting tools and procedures
The HMIS was not fully institutionalized
Poor information use at all levels
Very Limited resources for HMIS
Limited application of information technology
Milestones of HMIS development in Ethiopia
2008 to 2013 G.C
HMIS has been reformed to capture core indicators
A set of 108 core indicators were selected
Standardized data recording and reporting tools were
developed
Individual medical records,
Registers,
Tally sheets
Reporting formats
Huge investment on capacity building and HMIS
infrastructure
HIT curriculum was developed
Milestones of HMIS development in Ethiopia
2014-2016 G.C.
The HMIS was revised for the first time
A total of 122 core HMIS indicators were selected.
The recording and reporting procedures and tools were
revised
Since then some improvements have been observed with
regards to:
Data quality and
Information use for evidence-based decision making
Milestones of HMIS development in Ethiopia
1. Information management
• Data collection: Recording of health data using
registers, tally, individual and family folder etc. for
routine and non-routine activities.
• Data processing: is a process of cleaning, entering
and aggregation of data.
• Data analysis and presentation: is a process of
interpretation and comparison of generated
information in the form of sentence, tables and
graphs.
32
Components of HMIS…
33
HMIS tool and procedures
Common Tools
•Registers
•Tally sheets
•Reporting formats
Individual Medical Records Tools
• Individual Folder • Women’s card
• Individual Summary sheet • Appointment card
• Admission and discharge card
• Patient form/Patient card
• Vital sign sheet
• Service Identification (ID) card • Order sheet
• Master Patient Index Card • Medication administration record
• Tracer Card • Laboratory form
• Integrated RH card • Referral form, etc.
Description:
The data compiled in databases and/or reporting forms
Versus with what is in registers at facility level.
Similarly, when data is entered in the computers, data on
reporting forms versus computer file.
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS)
It is a method for testing hypothesis whether data quality is
achieved or not.
It uses a sample size of 12 data elements and tries to check the
reporting accuracy.
If the number of sampled data elements not meeting the standard
exceeds a pre-determined criterion (decision rule), then the lot is
rejected.
Decision rule table is used for determining whether the pre-set
criterion is met or not.
Comparison of LQAS results over time can indicate the level of
change.
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS)
Who: Health facilities will maintain a registry to record the data
consistency check results and to look the trend of the data
quality improvement.
What: pick the aggregated serial number for those having
detail data element (eg FP new acceptors considered as two
data elements having by age & sex aggregation)
Frequency: Monthly.
This is a method for testing hypothesis related with the level of
HMIS data quality whether it is achieved or not.
Data Accuracy Check Sheet
Month/Quarter/Year: September 2006E.C
Value in Consistent
Rando Register Tally Report Yes No
m# Reporting elements
2 New acceptors 15 20 20
Number of weights measured for
16 children <3 years 10 10 10
Measles immunizations for infant
21 <1 year of age 8 8 8
Early neonatal deaths
11 (institutional) 3 - 1
14 Low birth Weight 10 - 10
TT does used (all ages)/dose
28 opened 7 7 7
4 First antenatal attendances 20 - 20
60 Arthemisin/Lumphantrine -
87 Curative Visits<5::Repeat-female 15 - 15
92 Practitioners working in OPD - *2 2
32 VCT females aged >=25years 1 1 1
10 Institutional maternal death 1 - 0
44
Total (YES or NO) 8 4
The “Decision Rule”
45
LQAS… discussion point
The PMT members sit together and look across each line and
then from top to bottom to identify:
missing data values,
unexpected fluctuations beyond maximum/ minimum
values,
inconsistencies between linked data elements, and
mathematical errors.
Visual Scanning (Eye Balling)
Examples:
Family planning acceptors by age and method
disaggregation.
Antenatal first attendance by gestational and age
disaggregation.
Delivery attended by skilled health personnel vs Sum of still
birth and live birth
Inconsistencies of data elements/indicators over time
Comparison of performance across health facility
Frequency: any time
Routine Data Quality Assessment (RDQA)
Indicator Description HF1 HF 2 HF3 HF4 HF5 HF6 HF7 ∑A / ∑B VF= A/B
s
ANC4 Recounted=A 10 50 70 20 30 40 20 240 0.89
Reported=B 12 65 70 20 25 45 30 267
SBA Recounted =A 111 44 2 20 10 9 15 211 0.93
Reported=B 121 43 0 12 25 9 15 225
Penta 3 Recounted=A 25 45 30 12 20 10 0 142 0.83
Reported=B 38 59 30 16 15 13 0 171
Currently Recounted=A 10 22 10 5 40 19 20 126 1.94
on ART
Reported=B 0 12 4 5 32 12 0 65
Meseals Recounted=A 20 55 34 14 45 25 27 220 0.79
Reported=B 12 42 23 22 95 36 47 277
TB all Recounted=A 41 71 29 78 9 1 12 241 1.14
forms
Reported=B 29 36 34 80 6 10 17 212
Data Verification decision rule
System Assessment
• M&E Capabilities, Roles and Responsibilities
• Training
• Indicator Definitions
Plan on sharing the outcome with the levels and sites that
participated in the RDQA
Description of Responsible(
Identified Weaknesses Time Line
Action Point s)
1
2
3
4
HMIS Indicators
• It’s a measurement that measures the value of the change in
meaningful units that can be compared to past and future units
• Input
– Measures resource needed to carry out the activity
• Process
– Monitors activities that are carried out
• Output
– Measures immediate results of activities,
• Outcome
– Changes in knowledge, attitudes, behavior
• Impact
– Long term effects, effects in the health status
HMIS Indicators
The 122 HMIS indicators are divided into eight major categories
based on the HSDP IV Strategic objectives:
– Improve Access to Health Services (97 indicators)
– Community Ownership (2 indicators)
– Resource Mobilization and Utilization (4 indicators)
– Quality of health Services (6 indicators)
– Pharmaceutical Supply and Services (1 indicators)
– Evidence Based Decision Making (4 indicators)
– Health Infrastructure (4 indicators)
– Human Capital and leaders (4 indicators)
Reporting formats
By Type:
Service delivery report forms
Disease (Morbidity & Mortality) report form
PHEM reports
By Health institution:
Health post, Health center ,Hospital , clinics and
WorHO/ZHD/RHB
By reporting Period:
Immediate/ Weekly report
CHIS:
Community-centered at urban
The aim is to create basic health information at the grass root level
Overview of CHIS in Ethiopia _ Tools
Field book,
Family folder is used for rural, while community folder is for urban
Health Extension Programs.
Family Folder is a pouch that helps to record the household and
family characteristics.
It’s issued to every household in the Kebele.
These tools are stored for recording disease information, preventive and
promotive services to individual members of the household.
How Community folder pouch works?
e.g. Naming could be Gote1/G1, G2, G3: Ketena 01, 02, 03, …
The Health Extension Packages are all the same with rural HEP
Instead they use integrated registers. This is because of the mobile life
style of the community.
Overview of eCHIS