COMPETITIVE FACE OFF

MP C407 vs. HP M577

MP C407

HP M577
MP C407 Overview
The MP C407 is a 3rd generation device with
a proven track record. The Workstyle
Innovation Technology Platform brings
forth a new level of advancement to the
product series. Usability, productivity, and
energy efficiency have all improved from
the previous models. From faster printing,
scanning and recovery times, to better
paper handling and power consumption
numbers, the MP C407 is a standout from
its predecessors and strong competition for
MP C407
any manufacturer in this segment.
 Executive Summary
Focus Area MP C407 HP M577
Scanning 50 sheet SPDF that scans at 40/80ipm
100 sheet SPDF scanning at 45/45ipm (simplex/duplex)
Capability (simplex/duplex) & more productive than the HP

Large 10.1” color touch screen with tablet-like

Operation 8” color touch screen with a user friendly layout but
functionality that is easy to use, and more
Panel with limited tablet like functionality
advanced than the panel on HP M577
Similar features as the MP C407 drivers but there is
Useful features with easy downloads, installation
Print Drivers nothing like the Document Server and no true Adobe
steps and simple UI
PS3 support
“AIO Printer Remote” allows printing and scanning
SDC is a mobile tool for printing, scanning and
Mobile but its features are not as comprehensive as the SDC
displaying output on projectors and whiteboards
app
Numerous 3rd party solutions, ICE, Apps and the HP has 3rd party solutions and some embedded apps
Applications
Application Site but there is nothing like the Application Site
Paper Trays & Trays are well built with overhand/underhand Trays are well made with good paper handling, larger
Finishing handles but paper capacity is limited paper input/output capacity and paper weights

Front loading toners are easy to remove and black Front loading toner with higher color toner yields but
Consumables
toner and drum yields are higher the cartridges are all-in-one (Toner/Drum)

= Advantage
Specification Comparison

Item MP C407 HP M577

Print Speed (b&w/color) 42 ppm/36 ppm (Ltr) 40 ppm/40 ppm (Ltr)

Scan Speed (simplex/duplex) 40ipm/80ipm (Mono) 45ipm/45ipm (Mono)

CPU (Mainframe/Panel) 1.46 GHz (Intel)/Dual Core 1GHz 1.2 GHz/ -

Memory (min/max) 2 GB / 2 GB 1.75 GB / 2.5 GB MP C407

Hard Drive 320 GB 320 GB / 500 GB (Govt.)

Power Consumption (Sleep) 0.81 Watts 3.48 Watts

First Page Out Time (Copy) 6.2 sec (B&W) 5.5 sec (B&W)

Operation Panel Size 10.1” Color Touchscreen 8” Color Touchscreen

HP M577
Scanning Capability Comparison
MP C407
MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Faster duplex scan speed: 80ipm vs. the M577dn at 45ipm/40ipm (bw/color)
- Paper left behind warning is available only when scanning originals from the contact
glass is a nice security feature not offered on the HP
- Creating Encrypted and Digital Signature PDF’s is standard (Not supported on the
M577dn but supported on the HP M577c and M577z model)
- Embedded OCR scanning for creating searchable PDF’s (Not supported on the M577dn
but supported on the HP M577z model)
50 Sheet SPDF

What They Both Offer

- Single-pass feeder (Standard)
HP M577 - Max scan size from the document feeder: Legal
- Platen glass size: Legal
- Easy book copying from the scanner glass
- Capability of scanning mixed size originals
- File formats: JPG, TIF, PDF, PDF/A, Compact PDF

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- 100 sheet document feeder capacity vs. 50 sheets on the MP C407
100 Sheet SPDF - Simplex scan speed (bw) : 45ipm vs. 40ipm on the MP C407
Operation Panel (MP C407)
New Smart Operation Panel
(SOP) Overview
– 10.1” Color Touch screen display that’s among the largest in the industry
– New UI simplifies the overall user experience
– Dual Core 1GHz (CPU)
– Tablet-like functionality (Pinch/Flick/Swipe)
– Panel is customizable per user when authentication is enabled
– Resistive touchscreen works when using gloves and prosthetic limbs
– Legacy UI available for customers to match older devices
– Frequently used settings can be saved as an icon on the home screen
– The 72° tilt range on the SOP gives users flexible viewing angles
– Not all functions like Document Server and Address Book have the new UI

New Copy UI New Scan UI

Operation Panel (HP M577)
8” Panel w/ Soft Keys Overview
– 8” color touch screen panel
– Panel is customizable per user when authentication is enabled
– 1.2 GHz processor
– Frequently used function settings can be saved and recalled later
– Good tilt movement on the panel
– Scan preview is supported
– Saved settings can be recalled using the “Quick Sets” menu
– Copy, Scan, Fax UI’s have not changed in years
– Capacitive touch panel not as responsive as other manufacturers
– Home screen UI has no drag & drop functionality

Copy UI Scan UI
Operation Panel Comparison
MP C407 MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Bigger Screen: 10.1” color touch screen display vs. only 8” on the HP M577
-New UI simplifies the overall user experience. HP’s UI hasn’t changed in years
- Drag and drop icon positioning supported for quick customization
- Web browsing is possible out of the box but something not supported on the HP M577
- Resistive touch screen is capable of being used in all situations like wearing gloves for
example. The HP M577 has a capacitive screen which is limited
- Screen customization can be done to multiple devices using SOP Designer software

10.1” Smart Operation Panel

What They Both Offer
- Color touch screen panel for controlling the device functions
HP M577 - Panel has variable tilt range for multiple viewing angles
- Screen customization per user using authentication
- Scan Preview available before sending a scan job

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- FutureSmart firmware allows major UI changes across many generations of device
families

8” Color Touch Panel

Print Drivers Comparison
MP C407 MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Fewer tabs to navigate with only 3 tabs vs. 7 on the HP drivers
- Driver downloads: Website is easier to navigate to find the software needed
- Document Server (DS): The HP M577 can store jobs but it’s not as comprehensive as the
DS’s ability to organize and control documents
- True Adobe PS3 is an option on the MP C407 but not available for the HP M577dn
- Unauthorized Copy control is a nice security feature not offered in the HP driver
- Poster print takes a page and prints it over multiple pages for a poster size copy
- Import/Export driver settings for easy replication across drivers (Not offered in HP
PCL6 Driver Interface driver)
What They Both Offer
HP M577 - Print drivers: PCL5c/PCL6/PS and PCL6/PS Universal Drivers
- Custom driver settings can be saved and recalled at a later time
- All drivers have a similar UI layout for easy switching between PCL, PS, & Universal
- Good help screens from within the driver

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- Driver installer includes PCL6, PS, XPS and Fax all in one installation file the MP C407 has
all separate driver files
- The “EcoSmart” label allows the user to quickly identify eco-friendly settings (The MP
C407 driver has similar settings but they are not highlighted as “Eco”)

PCL6 Driver Layout

Mobile Support Comparison
MP C407
Smart Device Connector (SDC)
HP M577
MP C407 Advantage(s)
- SDC connects to video devices in addition to the MFP: (Projectors / Whiteboards)
- SDC is a useful communication tool allowing printing, scanning and displaying output on
a compatible video device which is something not offered on PageScope Mobile
- SDC supports copy and fax functionality but HP’s mobile solutions do not
- NFC can be used as a mobile connection method which is not supported by HP
- Smart Presenter is a free, easy to use paperless meeting app for iPads/iPhones and HP
has nothing like it
- Bluetooth can be used as a connection method for the mobile app but not on the HP
What They Both Offer
- Mobile solutions are available for connecting tablets and phones to the MFP’s
- Print Sources: Photos, web pages, mail, local folder, cloud
- Mobile connection methods: NFC, QR code, and network search
- Support for IOS and Android devices
- Airprint (IOS) and Mopria (Android) support

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- ePrint mobile allows users to print to devices from anywhere via the cloud but they
require internet access and an account with HP Cloud services (Free). The MP C407 has
Hotspot Enterprise/Express but they are paid options.

HP Mobile Apps
 Apps / Widgets (MP C407)
Single Function Apps / Widgets
Overview
– Many useful apps / widgets available as standard like, ID Card Copy,
Quick Copy and the Eco-friendly widget
– New Application Site allows apps to be downloaded directly to the
device using the panel
– ICE gives more cloud connectivity options than most competitors
– New apps and widgets are continually being developed
– Apps can be installed at the device or remotely using DMNX
– Currently, all apps on the Application Site are free

ID Card Copy Quick Copy ID Card Copy Quick Copy

Application Site
Apps / Widgets Comparison
MP C407
Single Function Apps/Widgets
HP M577
HP Solutions / Embedded Apps
MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Compatible with more 3rd party solutions
- Having ICE installed gives more cloud connectivity options than HP
- Application Site is our app repository and HP has nothing similar
- Currently, all apps on the Application Site are free
- Web browsing is a standard feature but it’s not supported on the HP M577
- Widget style apps on the main panel that give information are not found on the HP
- Larger selection of embedded applications vs. the HP M577
What They Both Offer
- Proprietary and 3rd party solutions available (Nuance, RightFax, etc…)
HP M577 Advantage(s)
- Better targeting of vertical market solutions on the websites in the US
 Paper Trays / Finishing Comparison
MP C407 MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Tray handles: Overhand/Underhand tray handles vs. the HP which only has side handles
that make the tray pull out unevenly (This is important for Section 508 compliance)
- Changing paper is quicker because users must confirm paper size on the panel with HP

What They Both Offer

2 Optional Trays w/ Storage
HP M577
- Max paper weight (Bypass): 220 gm2
- Maximum tray paper size is legal (Standard tray only supports letter)
-100 sheet bypass tray
- Envelope printing via the by pass
- Auto paper size detection
- Bypass tray located on the right side of the device
- No finishing options

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- Higher paper input capacity: 2300 sheets vs. 1350 on the MP C407
- Max paper output capacity: 250 sheets vs. 200 sheets on the MP C407
- Higher max paper weight (Regular Trays): 220 gm2 vs. 163 gm2 on the MP C407
- Lighted output bin which is not available on the MP C407
550 Sheet
Storage Bin
Optional Tray
Consumables Comparison
MP C407 MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Toner cartridges are separate from the drum which can avoid accidental damage due to
mishandling. Drums on the MP C407 are replaced by a service technician but the HP
toners are all-in-one toner/drum units.
- Toner cartridges are easier to remove and replace as they slide in and out smoother
- Black toner yield: 17,500 pages vs. only 6,000 and 12,500 for the HP
- Black drum yield: 60,000 pages vs. 6,000 or 12,500 pages on the HP M577 because this
model uses an all-in-one cartridge (Toner/Drum)
- Color drum yields (c/m/y): 36,000 pages vs. 5,000 or 9,500 on the HP M577 because this
Toner cartridges are front loading model uses an all-in-one cartridge (Toner/Drum)
What They Both Offer
- Front loading toner cartridges requiring 4 steps to remove
HP M577 - Toner cartridges are keyed to assure proper insertion

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- C/M/Y toner yield: 9,500 pages (High Yield) vs. only 8,000 for the MP C407
-Max recommended monthly volume: 7,500 pages vs. 5,000 on the MP C407
- Standard and high yield toners are available

Front loading all-in-one cartridge

Engine / Mainframe / Jam Clearance
MP C407 MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Sounds can be changed to make alerts, warnings and notifications unique which is
something not available on the HP
- Animations are also used to help resolve device issues but the M577 uses static images
- Smaller overall dimensions than the HP M577 for better placement on a desktop
- An MP C407 Page Keeper model is available with a multi-feed detection sensor which is
something not offered in the M577 series

Animations help resolve problems What They Both Offer

- Step by step Instructions and illustrations guide the user to clear device issues
- Paper flows from right to left so jams are cleared primarily from the right side
HP M577 - Good access to areas where jams and misfeeds can occur
- Wireless connectivity is available via an optional card
- How to videos viewable from the panel on basic operations, troubleshooting and more

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- Built-in help screens are easily accessible and gives specific help information in all areas

Images are provided on screen

Eco Capabilities Comparison
MP C407 MP C407 Advantage(s)
- Lower power in sleep mode: 0.81W vs. 3.48W on the HP M577
- Faster recovery from sleep mode: 8 sec vs. 9 sec on the HP
- Eco-Friendly Widget tracks paper and color utilization
- EPEAT Gold vs. Silver on the HP M577, which means the MP C407 is more eco friendly
(EPEAT looks at a device’s environmental impact from design to recycling)
- Toner cartridges are separate from the drum which is more eco-friendly because it
saves on unnecessary waste of a drum unit
Eco Widget / Certifications -TEC value: 1.8kWh/week is low compared to the competitors in the test group
(HP M577dn did not list a TEC value)
- Toner saving setting in the print driver isn’t available in the M577dn driver

HP M577 What They Both Offer

- Energy Star and EPEAT certification
- RoHS Compliant (Restriction of Hazardous Substances)
- Device timers and energy save modes
- Duplex, N-Up and sample printing
- Toner recycling is available for customers to send back used toner to the manufacturer

HP M577 Advantage(s)
- EcoSMART settings in the print driver point easily to eco-friendly options but the MP
C407 doesn’t label the Eco settings clearly
 Optional Accessories (MP C407)

Device w/ Optional Trays /

USB Type B Access Card Reader Additional Options
Output Bin / Storage

100 pg
output bin

NFC Card Reader Wireless Card

 Optional Accessories (HP M577)

Additional USB Common Card Reader Additional Options

Ports

Printer Cabinet

NFC Wireless Option

550 Sheet Optional Tray

(3 additional trays can be added)
Productivity: Executive Summary
PostScript printing showed various advantages during our testing. Despite being 4 ppm slower in
color (36 vs. 40) when compared to the HP, the MP C407 performed at a faster rate and boasted
higher print efficiency numbers in PowerPoint, Excel and Acrobat.

PCL print results showed even greater advantages for the MP C407. Results were similar in Excel but
Word, PowerPoint and Acrobat showed significant advantages for the MP C407. Overall, it proved to
be a much more consistent and efficient device.

Print Duplex Productivity was great on both devices and identical at 86% of efficiency.

Copy testing was split down the middle. The MP C407 showed slight advantages in simplex mode
while the HP M577 had advantages with duplex documents.

When it came to Scanning, the MP C407 did not disappoint. Although monochrome simplex speeds
slightly favored the HP (45 vs. 42). The MP C407 destroyed it with its color and duplex speeds. The
MP C407 also showed advantages when it came to scan file sizes. In both black and white and color it
typically provided smaller file sizes when compared to the HP. The MP C407 also offered better
versatility with its scan settings (dpi choices, compression, etc.)
 Application Performance Print Testing
All Application Performance Testing is conducted with QualityLogic’s PageSense automated
testing software.

Our A4 test suite is made up of 15 test files consisting of a total of 680 printed pages across
4 applications: Microsoft Office 2010 (4 test files for Word, PowerPoint, and Excel) and 3
files for Adobe Acrobat. All tests are run two to three times based on the consistency of the
results, totaling about 4,080 printed pages.
Test files range from simple to very complex test files with embedded graphics and fonts
and contain color elements.

Note: The total number of pages run on each machine for testing is approximately 15,000
(Print/Copy/Scan).
 Reading the Charts….
The following charts use nomenclature you may not be familiar with. Here are some helpful hints:

Blue plus signs indicate a significant productivity advantage (typically areas with a 5% higher
efficiency rating or greater)

The longer the bar, the better in the efficiency charts (all numbers are percentages).

The shorter the bar, the better in the performance charts (all times are in seconds).

All times are cumulative results from an application. In other words; the sum of all given test files per
application

T1P = Time to First Page: This is the first page out time
TLP = Time to Last Page: This is the last page out time
 Improvements from the MP C406
 Intel Processor + SPDF (Single Pass Document Feeder) increase productivity!

Function Area MP C406 MP C407 Difference Result

PS Print Efficiency 43% 65% + 22% MAJOR IMPROVEMENT

PCL Print Efficiency 66% 71% + 5% MINOR IMPROVEMENT

Monochrome Copy Efficiency 61% 86% + 24% MAJOR IMPROVEMENT

Color Copy Efficiency 54% 91% + 37% MAJOR IMPROVEMENT

Mono Simplex Scan speeds 32ipm 42ipm + 10ipm MINOR IMPROVEMENT

Mono Duplex Scan speeds 10ipm 83ipm + 73ipm MAJOR IMPROVEMENT

Color Simplex Scan speeds 20ipm 42ipm + 22ipm MAJOR IMPROVEMENT

Color Duplex Scan speeds 8ipm 83ipm + 75ipm MAJOR IMPROVEMENT

PostScript Print Efficiency

Summary: Here is a closer look at the Efficiency ratings of the MP C407 and HP M577. Efficiency ratings are especially important
when comparing machines with different ppm’s. In this case the MP C407 is 36 ppm in color while the HP M577 is 40 ppm color.

PostScript print results were very close and comparable. The MP C407 had a slight advantage when printing PowerPoint
presentations while Word and Excel yielded nearly identical results. Adobe Acrobat was the biggest differentiator, the MP C407
performed 7% more efficiently than the HP M577 in this application.

Note: The longer the bar, the better.

MP C407 vs. HP M577- PostScript Print

Note: The shorter the bar, the better.

PostScript Print: Win / Loss Ratio
Our test suite is made up of 15 test files across 4 applications: Microsoft Office 2010
(4 test files for Word, PowerPoint, and Excel) and 3 files for Adobe Acrobat.

4 Wins: MP C407 3 Ties: MP C407

8 Losses: MP C407

Summary: Across the entire test suite, the MP C407 won 27% of all test cases against the HP
M577. One could argue that the HP has a 4 ppm advantage in color and should win the
majority of, if not every test case. Regardless of its slower speed the MP C407 proved
to be a worthy competitor to the faster HP M577. Despite its record the MP
C407 was the more efficient device in our head to head comparison.
PCL Print Efficiency

Summary: Here is a closer look at the Efficiency ratings of the MP C407 and HP M577. Efficiency ratings are especially important
when comparing machines with different ppm’s. In this case the MP C407 is 36 ppm in color while the HP M577 is 40 ppm color.

PCL results were much less competitive between these two devices but the MP C407 continued to be more efficient regardless.
Significant advantages were uncovered when printing Word docs, PowerPoint presentations and PDF files, while Excel showed
smaller advantages.

Note: The longer the bar, the better.

MP C407 vs. HP M577 – PCL Print

Note: The shorter the bar, the better.

PCL Print: Win / Loss Ratio
Our test suite is made up of 15 test files across 4 applications: Microsoft Office 2010
(4 test files for Word, PowerPoint, and Excel) and 3 files for Adobe Acrobat.

6 Wins: MP C407

9 Losses: MP C407

Summary: Across the entire test suite, the MP C407 won 40% of all test cases against the HP.
One could argue that the HP has a 4 ppm advantage in color and should win the majority of, if
not every test case. Regardless of its slower speed the MP C407 proved to be a worthy
competitor to the faster HP M577. Despite its record the MP
C407 was the more efficient device in our head to head comparison.
Print Duplex Efficiency – PS & PCL

75%

Summary: Print Duplex Productivity was great on both devices and identical at 86%
of efficiency!

Note: The longer the bar, the better.

MP C407 vs. HP M577 – Copy Efficiency

Note: The longer the bar, the better.

 Scan Productivity : Scan-to-USB
IPM: Images Per Minute

75%

The HP M577 posted lesser ipm speeds than we expected in color. Our dpi settings (300) caused the
HP to perform at a slower rate. The faster specs printed on the brochure (45ipm simplex/duplex) are
based off of settings and selections different from the ones we use during our testing. The CAT Lab
suggests that scans should be saved at 300 dpi or higher to ensure document readability and quality.
 Scan File Sizes
Test File / DPI / File Format MP C407 HP M577 MP C407 HP M577
Covered Bridge - JPG Color Color B/W B/W
200 DPI 273 KB 358 KB N/A N/A
300 DPI 527 KB 702 KB N/A N/A
400 DPI 829 KB 1.2 MB N/A N/A
600 DPI 1.5 MB 2.7 MB N/A N/A
Covered Bridge - PDF Color Color B/W B/W
200 DPI 274 KB 369 KB 456 KB 149 KB
300 DPI 528 KB 717 KB 1 MB 304 KB
400 DPI 831 KB 1.2 MB 1.8 MB 547 KB
600 DPI
Covered Bridge-High Comp PDF
1.5 MB
Color
2.8 MB
Color
75%
3.9 MB
B/W
1 MB
B/W
200 DPI 72 KB N/A N/A N/A
300 DPI 133 KB 182 KB N/A 182 KB
400 DPI 206 KB N/A N/A N/A
600 DPI 390 KB N/A N/A N/A

•Green cells denote smaller file size (BETTER) Red cells denote larger file size (WORSE)
•N/A means that the option is not available (file format and/or DPI selection)
 Scan To OCR

MONOCHROME COLOR
Simplex Duplex Simplex Duplex
  Scanning +Processing= Total Time Scanning +Processing= Total Time Scanning +Processing= Total Time Scanning +Processing= Total Time
MP C407 9 12 21 sec 10 20 30 sec 9 13 22 sec 10 20 30 sec
HP M577 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

75%
Summary: Our Scan to OCR testing incorporates the time taken to scan a 5 page test document at 300
dpi. The file is saved as a searchable PDF (OCR) and is stored on a USB drive. Time is measured from
when we hit "scan" and ends when the control panel alerts us that writing is complete.

Scan-to-OCR results were very strong in both simplex and duplex modes for the MP C407.
Unfortunately we were unable to test Scan to OCR on our HP M577dn because the built-in OCR option
is not available on this device. It is available on both the HP M577c and HP M577z models.
 Printing from Sleep Mode

Warm Up Time From Sleep

  Specification T1P TLP

MP C407 8 sec 15 sec 30 sec

HP M577 9 sec 75%

60 sec 74 sec

Summary: Printing from Sleep Mode testing is based off of a 4 hour sleep. Devices are put to sleep,
cooled down and unused. Time is measured from when we hit “print" and results are measured for the
Time to 1st Page (T1P) and Time to Last Page (TLP).

The MP C407 performed very well when it came to printing out of Sleep Mode. It warms up very
quickly and in turn prints jobs at a much faster rate when compared to the HP M577.
Jams / Misfeeds / Issues During Testing
Product # of Jams / Misfeeds out of 15,000 pages
MP C407 3
HP M577 5

75%
Summary: There were no major issues or problems with the MP C407 or HP M577.
 We test image quality by two distinct methods.

 Subjective: a general look at photographic, text, and tonal properties of a printed image when
viewed by the eye

 Scientific: a scientific analysis of the printed image based on standards set via a benchmark and with
measurable values and statistics
 Executive Summary
Overall, image quality on the MP C407 was excellent; photographic and standard office documents looked crisp and professional. The MP
C407 does a great job printing and copying fonts. Halftones and print resolution were great using both drivers. The MP C407 also delivers
rich black densities as high as 1.49. Print consistency was good across a measured page. Greater consistency leads to less banding, and more
accuracy within various regions of the printed page. The combination of text and graphics would be fine for handouts such as formal reports,
and marketing materials to clients or colleagues that are seeking to impress.

Halftones:
The MP C407 can generate smoother halftones. What this means to customers is a more accurate reproduction of the original image.
So photos will be more realistic for both color and gray scale.

Lines:
The ability to print closely spaced lines without artifacts is not an easy task. While the HP M577 does an acceptable job, the MP C407’s line
reproduction is ahead of the pack. This will lead to better quality prints, copies and scans of technical documents, bar codes, maps, etc.

Photographic Reproduction:
The MP C407 was as good as or better than all of the products in this test group. Printed, Copied and Scanned photos had excellent color
matching, halftone reproduction, smoothness, and saturation.

The MP C407’s ability to print, copy and scan text, fine lines, and photographic images is better then the HP M577 as a whole.
This means customers get a true reproduction of the original.

The HP M577 demonstrated color accuracy issues. Several colors were not true to the original and appeared faded. Print consistency was
great on this device; however , we noticed fonts were faded and broken-up at smaller sizes.
Print Gamut/Consistency PS Driver
MP C407 HP M577

Gamut Overlay Print Consistency

Gamut: The MP C407 PS driver had a significantly larger gamut of 43.69% when compared to the HP M577. The MP
C407 has the ability to print a much larger range of colors; especially when printing blues, greens, yellows and reds.
Print Consistency: The HP M577 had far greater print consistency when printing solid color test targets compared to the
MP C407. Greater consistency leads to less banding, and more accuracy within various regions of the printed page. The
MP C407 was also rated good print consistency.
Gamut and Print Consistency is measured on a Greytag SpectroScan table that takes 450 measurements of solid colored
sheets from top to bottom and side to side.
Printed Text PS Driver
MP C407 HP M577

2 PT Font, 40x Magnification 2 PT Font, 40x Magnification

10 PT Font, 40x Magnification 10 PT Font, 40x Magnification

BOTTOM LINE: The MP C407 provided good results when printing small and large fonts using the PS driver. The MP C407
printed some hollow text making the characters appear incomplete.

The HP M577 printed smaller text too lightly and broken up, making it difficult to make out some of the letters. This was
particularly noticeable with yellow.
Printed Images PS Driver
MP C407 HP M577

BOTTOM LINE: The MP C407 produced excellent results when printing photographic images from the PS driver. The MP
C407 displayed excellent color accuracy and gradations were smooth with no banding. The MP C407 also delivered a closer
representation of the original than the HP M577.
The HP M577 generated average quality prints. The HP demonstrated color accuracy issues and prints appeared faded with
a magenta cast in the blues and the red.
Print Gamut/Consistency PCL6 Driver
MP C407 HP M577

Gamut Overlay Print Consistency

Gamut: The HP M577 PCL6 driver had a 4.04% larger gamut than the MP C407. The HP can print more blues and greens;
while the MP C407 can print more yellows and reds. This is not necessarily an indicator of overall print quality as the MP
C407 print samples were still ranked as good.
Print Consistency: Print consistency on the PCL6 driver was much better on the HP M577 and provided adequate results
when printing solid color test targets and demonstrated acceptable accuracy across the entire page.
Gamut and Print Consistency is measured on a Greytag SpectroScan table that takes 450 measurements of solid colored
sheets from top to bottom and side to side.
Printed Text PCL6 Driver
MP C407 HP M577

2 PT Font, 40x Magnification 2 PT Font, 40x Magnification

10 PT Font, 40x Magnification 10 PT Font, 40x Magnification

BOTTOM LINE: When printing with PCL6, the MP C407 printed small fonts more accurately than the HP M577. Fonts were
solid with no noticeable breakage; however, we discovered some slight toner blasting / speckles on the page with both small
and large text.

The HP M577 printed text was slightly broken up and faded at smaller point sizes.
Larger text printed with no issues.
Printed Images PCL6 Driver
MP C407 HP M577

BOTTOM LINE: : When printing photographic documents with PCL6, the MP C407 looked crisp and professional.
Colors were more vibrant and fine details were more defined when compared to the HP M577.
The HP M577 generated average quality prints when compared to the other devices tested. Several photos showed
color accuracy issues and there was loss of detail in some of the bright and dark areas of photos.
Copied Text
MP C407 6PT HP M577 6PT MP C407 14PT HP M577 14PT

Copy Text (6 & 14 PT Font, 40x Magnification)

BOTTOM LINE: When copying small font sizes, the MP C407 and HP M577 devices exhibited some toner blasting and broken
curves.

Both devices did an excellent job copying larger font sizes.

Copied Images
MP C407 Original HP M577

BOTTOM LINE: The MP C407 produced copies with great color accuracy and fine detail. Color accuracy was particularly
good when comparing the wood tones and color of the lures to the original.

HP M577 produced average quality copies. Color accuracy was slightly off and we noticed cross-hatching in the
backgrounds.
Scan Quality
MP C407 HP M577

SCAN Settings: 300 x 300 dpi, Full Color, Scan to USB, PDF

BOTTOM LINE Scanned image quality on the MP C407 was excellent displaying great detail and generated a precise
outcome when compared to the original. The MP C407 was able to show almost all halftone increments (10% to 100%)
while the HP started at 30% increment on the Katun color test chart. Lines had no breakage and colors had nice solid fills
on both devices; however, the HP M577 colors were slightly off and blacks had tints of CMY in them.
Thank You!
Any Questions?

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY - DO NOT DISTRIBUTE