Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONSUMER PROTECTION - 2019 - Preliminary, Council
CONSUMER PROTECTION - 2019 - Preliminary, Council
Employee welfare:
An employee-member of an Employees’ Provident
Fund Scheme has been held to be a consumer of the
services of the Provident Fund Commissioner. The latter
would be liable to any employee-member for any delay or
deficiency of services [RPF Commissioner V. Shiv
Kumar Joshi- (2000) 1 SCC 98].
It is suggested that this rule may be extended to ESI
dispensaries and hospitals.
THE C. P. ACT 2019- Section 2
After-sales services: Where a machine is purchased
for a commercial purpose, the purchaser as such may not
be a consumer, but in respect of after-sales services he
would be a consumer. Therefore, he can proceed under
the Act for defective service during the warranty period
[Kaleeswari Industries V. Mather & Platt (India) Ltd. –
(1993) 2 CPR 601 TN].
THE C. P. ACT 2019- Section 2
Ration card:
An applicant for a ration card is not a consumer. He
cannot complain under the Act for the denial of the card
to him [Parabchand Jain V. CEO, Nagar Palika- (1995) 2
CPJ 22 MP].
Railway passenger: a railway passenger is a consumer
[Basanta Kumar Sahoo V. Chief Commercial Manager-
(1998) 3 CPJ 286 (Ori)].