Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 6 - Moral and Economic Rights
Unit 6 - Moral and Economic Rights
Unit 6 - Moral and Economic Rights
SCHOOL OF LAW
L340 – IP LAW
UNIT 6 – MORAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS
George Mpundu Kanja
Structure of Presentation
• Introduction – Moral Rights
• Paternity Right
• Integrity Right
• False Attribution of a Work
• Right to Privacy in Relation to Photographs and Films
• Divulgation Right
• Retraction Right
• Duration of Moral Rights
• Waiver of Moral Rights
Structure of Presentation
• Introduction – Economic Rights
• Reproduction right
• Translation right
• Adaptation right
• Public performance right
• Broadcasting right
• Communication right
• Distribution right
• Rental right
• Right of Display
• Right of resale (Droit de suite)
Introduction
• There are two types of rights granted to the
authors under copyright, namely the moral
rights and economic rights.
• Moral rights are those rights which relate to the
protection of the personality of the author and
the integrity of his work, and similar matters.
• They allow the author to take certain actions to
preserve the personal link between himself and
the work.
Introduction
• Economic rights, on the other hand, are those
rights concerning control over the
commercial or industrial exploitation of
works, and other means of use of the works
which involve such acts as reproduction or
representation.
• They allow the owner to derive financial
reward from the use of his works by others.
Introduction
• Some countries such as the USA does not fully recognize
moral rights except those for visual art and as such it is
not a member or party to any international copyright
convention that includes moral rights.
• The USA excludes moral rights mainly because it may
conflict with the exploitation of copyright works, in
particular, for works made for hire or commissioned
work, in that every time the work has to be exploited in
certain way one has to respect the moral rights of the
author or director and if necessary obtain their
permission.
Introduction
• In Zambia the Copyright and Performance Rights Act,
does recognize moral rights.
• Section 24 (2) provides that notwithstanding the transfer
of the copyright, or any part of it, the author or director
of audiovisual work shall have the right:-
• (a) to be identified as the author or director of the
works; and
• (b) to object to any distortion, mutilation or other
modification or derogatory action in relation to the work
that would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation.
Introduction
• Moral rights can only arise and initially be granted to an
individual.
• Thus all authors of original works and directors of films
or audiovisual works are accorded moral rights, while the
owners of the entrepreneurial related rights are not
granted moral rights.
• Related rights often rely on or derived from copyright
works and are secondary rights, such as recording of an
original musical work. They are linked to the
entrepreneurial exploitation of copyright and as such
moral rights are not needed in relation to them.
Paternity Right
• Rattee J stated:
• Before accepting the plaintiff’s view that the
reproduction in the book complained of is prejudicial to
his honour or reputation, I have to be satisfied that that
view is one which is reasonably held, which inevitably
involves the application of an objective test of
reasonableness. It seems to me that there is a possible
defence … that, in fact, the reputation of the plaintiff
would not be harmed one which in the mind of any
reasonable person looking at the reproduction of which
he complains.
Integrity Right
• The Copyright and performance Rights Act does not define what
constitutes “public” as regards a performance.
• Nonetheless, the term “public” as it relates to performance has
been subjected to judicial interpretation.
• Thus in Jennings v Stephens, the plaintiff owned copyright in a
play, which was performed, without the plaintiff’s consent, for
the defendant’s women’s club by amateur players from another
women’s club. The plaintiff claimed the performance had been
“in public”.
• The defendant said that its club was private and the
performance occurred without charge. The Court nevertheless
held that the performance had been “in public”.
PUBLIC PERFORMANCE RIGHT