Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Managing Conflicts and Peace Building.
Managing Conflicts and Peace Building.
MERITS OF CONFLICTS
Unearths deep seated problems Enhances understanding among parties Challenges leaders to explore solutions Challenges the communities status quo Helps people to change unhelpful behaviors ( habits and other social evils) Avails opportunities for people to be more innovative and creative Promotes group solidarity and cohesiveness
Demerits of conflicts
Destruction of property, physical infrastructure, loss of lives, displacement of families abuse of women and children Erosion of social support system Loss of knowledge and experiences ( as the old die without passing on the wisdom)
Cont
Missed opportunities for socio-economic development Exploitation by external parties Stigmatization and trauma Environmental destruction
Structural/Systemic Structural/Systemic
These are underlying factors that have been built into the policies, structures and fabric of a society and may create pre-conditions for violent conflict. These include; Unequal distribution of resources and opportunities Corruption Authoritarian/totalitarian governance Colonial legacy and or neo-colonialism Religious and ethnic discrimination Endemic poverty
Proximate Causes
These are factors contributing to a climate conducive to violent conflict or its further escalation, sometimes symptomatic of a deeper problem. Proliferation of small arms Institutional failure- Electoral commission resulting to rigging , law courts-denial f ustice
Conflict Indicators ( macro- level) macroSocial Indicators Mounting demographic pressures Massive movement of refugees or internally displaced persons creating complex humanitarian emergencies. Legacy of vengeance seeking group grievance Chronic and sustained human flight
Cont
Economic Indicators Uneven economic development along group lines Sharp and/or even severe economic decline
Cont
Political/Military Indicators Criminalization and or de-legitimization of the state Progressive deterioration of public services Suspension or arbitrary application of the rule of law and wide spread violation of human rights. Security apparatus operates as a state within a state Rise of factionalized elites Intervention of other states or external political actors.
Cont
Mapping of allies and powers How? Ask each party to sketch what they perceive to be their area /community space Ask them to locate areas of conflict
Mapping analysis
For each of the mapped areas of the conflict let each party identify; Issue or issues for the conflict ( their perception) Causes for the conflict Parties in conflict Parties to the conflict Effects of the conflict Possible solutions to the conflict
Cont
Helps parties involved to identify parties in the conflict and other actors to the conflict in a nonthreatening way shows the relationship between parties in a conflict and how they influence each other Provides an opportunities to parties involved to share / generate home-grown solution, deepening understanding among themselves
Cont
The tool helps to understand the position from which each actor is approaching conflict The context within which conflict is taking place. Helps to identify the key needs of each actor.
Cont
Indicate the most important needs and/or fears for each party in the middle of the triangle; remember that this choice is your own perception Compare the different triangles for the different parties, noting the similarities and differences in perceptions
An example
A-Attitudes Arrogance Willingness to change Hopeless ness B- Behaviors Abduction Killing Quarrelling C- Context Poverty Land scarcity Discrimination Injustice
Cont
In any conflict situation, conflict may be managed or resolved in a manner that results to any of the three levels ; a. Lose-lose. Both parties lose. e.g Compromising/taking middle ground,Pay off one party e.g. bribes or resorting to bureaucratic rules /regulations.
Cont
b. Win-lose. One party marshals its forces to win and the other party to lose. Energies are focused on defeating the other party but not solving the problem. E.g. in Law courts, Employer Employee conflicts, Blood compensation, mediations etc c. Win Win. Energies and creativity is geared towards solving the problem ( but not either of the parties)
WinWin-Win situation
Call the conflicting parties together and ask them what happened not who did it?. Involve as many stakeholders as possible. Listen carefully to each of the parties perceptions and interests. Facilitate the parties to discuss issues raised by each of the parties
Cont
Help them identify the problem/name the problem. Facilitate them to generate solutions and suggestions to solve the problem. Make them choose the best option/ suggestion to solve the problem.
Traditional Method
These are methods that particular communities have used over time and are embedded in the community value systems, attitudes and culture. The traditional process is cheaper in terms of time and relatively well understood by most people as compared to the conventional legal system which is too much time consuming and complex Traditional methods differ from one community to the other
Cont
Traditional methods should not be taken as blue print but should be analyzed to answer the following: What are the implications of using traditional methods of conflict resolution? Who is involved? What are the long-term effects? What do communities think of these methods? And what are these methods perpetuating?
Cont
It has a wide network to disseminate information; It has legitimacy; It provides points of refuge for victims of conflicts; and It has the message of reconciliation in its teachings.
Promotion of Democracy
Democracy provides a framework for justice, fairness and equality. Generally, democracy means a way of governing based on peoples consent. It stands for the welfare of all and for the common good. Democracy is an important element of peace building because it recognizes that power belongs to the people. Both pursue;
Cont
Democracy will promote ; Greater freedom for people A just society Equality before the law and Equal opportunities for all.
Active Non-Violence Non Active Non-Violence is a lifestyle. Active Non-Violence is about pro-actively engaging with an often-violent world without resorting to violence oneself . It is about not just being the change you wish to see in the world but also going out to create that change in others
Cont
To meet violence with effective nonviolence requires considerable preparation, self-belief and self-control It can involve anything from talking to friends or neighbours in ones own community or discussions among community leaders.
Cont
ANV seeks to destroy enmity, not the enemy. It is evil that the ANV resistor seeks to defeat not the persons victimized by evil. It seeks friendship and reconciliation rather than defeat or humiliation of an opponent.
Cont
ANV demands that the means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek. It is wrong to use immoral means to attain moral ends and vice versa.
Cont
The aims are: Creating a trusting environment Information sharing (facts and figures) Building and restoring relationships Collective critical analyses (root causes) of the conflict
Cont
Exploring options for dealing with the conflict Establishing action points for the parties involved in the conflict Developing monitoring & evaluation system for the actions implemented. Organizing periodic follow-ups.
Cont
It does not seek to permanently end the conflict because it does not address its root causes It intervenes to prevent the escalation and reduce the cost of that conflict.
Arbitration
Most common in legal settlement of conflicts Judgment is reached according to ones ability to argue the case out rather than address the problem. It is not so much what the problem is but what one wants or how much can one get.
Cont
The arbitrator therefore addresses what the parties are interested in getting, rather the source of the conflict. The arbitrator sees the problem as a dispute over spoils rather than a conflict over needs. The two parties choose the arbitrator. The parties agree on the rules.
Cont
The decision of the arbitrator is biding to all the parties. Often, the outcome is a win-loose one. The problem with arbitration is the grievances, like in a court situation, remain long after the decision has been made.
Mediation
Use of third party or mediator is a as gobetween. A mediator facilitate negotiations between the parties, - get the parties to sit together and talk about the conflict. The mediator helps parties arrive at the best possible solution to their current problem, (may not be the best outcome for the parties).
Cont
Outcomes are achieved through compromise. Compromise leads to lose-lose outcomes.
Reconciliation
It is along term process of overcoming hostilities, mistrust and suspicion between people in conflict Reconciliation is a process of confidence and trust building that leads to healing justice rather than revenge justice The kind of justice that promotes human rights, rule of law of a given society, economic ad gender fairness
Cont
The method involves an effort to get the parties to agree and forgive each other May appoint subcommittees from different parties to dialogue on nature and causes of conflict and come up with recommendations A third party may talk to the two parties separately-gathering information and areas of compromise
Key questions
What do you like/appreciate about the other party? What do you find difficult about the other party? (What has gone wrong, why and how?)
Cont
What do you request of the other party to achieve an amicable solution to the problem? What compromises are you willing to make to have a lasting peace to the conflict ?
Roles
Starter Roles Provokes community to action (social analyst) Awareness raising. Transformational facilitators, process helper, challenges and helps communities to change. Rolemodel.
Cont
Links community with others like minded individuals and institutions (stakeholders) Facilitate formation of horizontal and vertical linkages. Resources persons (Trainer, information sharing) Co-ordinates peace building initiatives.
Cont
Accomplisher roles Analyst, facilitate community to review and evaluate their peace building activities. Planners, facilitates participatory planning of activities. Manager provides visionary leadership. Formation of task force to coordinate peace building activities. Documents / reports peace activities and lessons learnt