ANPQP Version 2.

1
2 Days Training

Second Day - Afternoon

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Chapter 4 – Focus on Phase 4 Agenda
 Product / Process Review during Phase 4
rn o on
Afte  Definitions ; who approves the PSW and the AFF ?
 Presentation of the PSW and the AFF documents
 Reminder on concessions
 CR RAPP : how to use the Product Process Status Review document
 The Conformity Reference File

Chapter 5 – Focus Phase 5, mass production

 Updating of the Conformity Reference File during Mass production
 Change Management
 Transfer, resourcing
 Non-conforming Product Management

Conclusion
SOS ANPQP

Debriefing – Training Evaluation Sheet

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 2
 Focus on Phase 4 and Category 7 :
Part Production Approval

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 7.1 Production Part Approval

Confirm that the product meets

Renault / Nissan requirements

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 4
 Renault quality rules

Two quality procedures describe the processes:

 « Part Submission Warrant ( PSW) and Supplier Manufacturing Approval (

AFF) procedure  » (RPIFMETHQ20050001 – V2.0)

 « Bought Out Parts Conformity Reference File (ANPQP) »

(RPIFMETHQ20060017 )

These rules are applicable for all Vehicle and Powertrain Projects.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 5
 ANPQP management (ex. : vehicle scope)
PSW Approval

ANPQP Phase 3 To manage what

has « still to be
done »
ANPQP Phase 4

Off-tools validation Supplier Manufacturing

Approval (AFF)

: Kick off meeting

POE Product/Process
status review If needed Pre : P/P status review
Production audit
: P/P status review with OK top
for PSW and AFF presentation

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 6
 Product / Process Progress Status Reviews in phase 4
AM Slot / AMIOD (project milestones
100% OK
100% OK
t o PSW AFF
Criteria
Conve rg en ce
r i t e ria to
gen ce C
Con
v er PSW AFF AF
Approved Approved

P/P R inc. convergence reviews to PSW / AFF P/P R in GFS during mass
production
The evaluation of PSW & AFF criteria :
is made during the Product / Progress Status Reviews
Is conclued by a Report : CR RAPP signed by all Core Team Members

The approved CR RAPP authorizes the Supplier to submit :

 the PSW and the attached documents for signature by SQF.
then
 the AFF and the attached documents for signature by SQF.
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 7
 Convergence reviews to PSW and AFF

The Product Process Status Review Report gives a global summary

of the Part development status.

The main information that the Report shall contain is :

 The open items (i.e. a problem) and the associated detailed
action plans,
 The OK (K0) / NOK Status,
 The permission or not for the Supplier to present the PSW or
AFF,
 Description of the Quality wall or additional inspections to be
implemented

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 8
 PSW & AFF definitions

The Supplier commitments are formalized in 2 forms.

 The Parts Submission Warrant (PSW) gives a decision on the

Supplier’s ability to manufacture and deliver a compliant part.

 The Supplier Manufacturing Approval (AFF) gives a decision on

the Supplier ability to manufacture and deliver a compliant part at
full volume.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 9
 Why a new procedure?

 For application on the vehicle AND the powertrain

perimeter.

 To simplify the process and the PSW/AFF approval

criteria.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 10
Part Submission Warrant (PSW) and Supplier Manufacturing Approval (AFF)
Approval Procedure Version 2.0

The procedure in 7 points

Référence : RPIFMETHQ20050001 – V2.0

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 The 7 points

 Basics
 5 key points to approve a PSW
 Which status for the PSW?
 3 key points to approve the AFF
 Which status for the AFF?
 A key principle: 1 approved PSW/AFF for each Part
Reference, Supplier site, Renault assembly/machining
site.
 Some particular cases

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 12
 Basics

 What is the objective of the PSW Approval?

 Recognizes that what is implemented by the Supplier gives us
confidence in his capacity to respect its commitment of compliance.
 Authorizes consequently the delivery by the Supplier of bought-out
parts in customer plant in the mass production conditions for the
manufacturing or the assembly on saleable powertrain units or vehicles.

 What is the objective of the AFF Approval?

 Confirms that what is implemented guarantees the delivery of bought-o
ut parts which are compliant with our requirements at full volume c
onditions.
 Confirms that the additional activities to ensure the ramp-up, guarantees
the respect for Renault requirements at the requested volumes.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 13
 Basics
 Who is in charge of the implementation of the PSW/AFF Approval
process?
 The GFE/GFS Pilot through the Product-Process Progress Status Reviews
(RAPP).

 What is a « RAPP »?
 This is a review of the different evaluation criteria of the PSW and the AFF.
 Objective: to evaluate the progress of the product-process validation.
 The review is managed by the GFE/GFS Pilot with at least the participation of the
Purchaser, a representative of the Plant SQA and the Supplier.

 When are the PSW and the AFF presented?

 The authorization to present the PSW and the AFF is given during the RAPP and
is formalized in the minutes of the review.

 Who approves the PSW/AFF?

 The SQA manager of the Renault assembly/machining plant.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 14
 5 key points to approve a PSW

Drawings, Inspection Report,

Test Report…  1- Is the product compliant to the
Validation test results
engineering specifications and drawings?
realized by Renault,
Analysis of Appearance Approval,
Assembly Agreement, …
Supplier’s
ANPQP
 2- Is the manufacturing site the one forecasted
deliverables RFQ Answer, Production between Renault and the Supplier for PSW ?
Preparation Monitoring Plan…

Production Preparation  3- Is the manufacturing process the one forecasted

Monitoring Report, Control between Renault and the Supplier for PSW ?
Plan, Process Flow Chart…

Analysis of Capability Results, EDI  4- Is the manufacturing process

Agreement…
Renault under control?
results
 5- Does the product generate or risk to generate
AVES Evaluation… Ki, Vi, PTi on the vehicle/ powertrain?

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 15
 What status for the PSW?

 Approval if all criteria are satisfied.

 Interim Approval if:

 The criteria 1 « product compliant » and/or 4 « process under control » in
not satisfied but judged acceptable.
 And the criteria 5 « Vi, Ki, PTi » is at a level accepted by the Project Team.
 And each point which presents a gap is covered by a concession.
 (The criteria 2 & 3 have to be fully approved)

 If not, the PSW is not presented.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 16
 3 key points to approve the AFF

PSW  1- Is the PSW approved without

Analysis of interim approval?
Supplier’s
ANPQP
deliverables

Ramp-up activity Plan

 2- Is the ramp-up activity plan
validated?

Capacity Submission Warrant,  3- Is the Supplier process at the

Capability Results, Process
audit results…
mass production capacity level?
Analysis of
Renault
results Logistics Agreement, Pre-
production audit Results

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 17
 What status for the AFF?

 Approval if all criteria are satisfied.

 PSW neither approved nor interim approved

AND/OR Ramp-up activity plan not validated
AND/OR Process not at the capacity level

=> AFF not presented

 No Interim Approval for the AFF.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 18
 A key principle: 1 approved PSW/AFF for each Part Reference, Supplier site, Renault
assembly/machining site.

Bought-out Part Ref 11

Supplier X
Supplier Site Y Later

ILN
International Logistic Network

Plant 1
Plant 2

PSW/AFF
New validations ? Suppliers
signed by recommendations ?
the SQA of 1
PSW/AFF All criteria are taken At least the following criteria are
signed by into account to reviewed:
the SQA of 1 approve the PSW/AFF. Assembly/ Machining, Logistics (DCL,
EDI) and Capacity Level for the plant 2.
PSW/AFF
signed by
the SQA of 2
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 19
 A key principle: 1 approved PSW/AFF for each Part Reference, Supplier site, Renault
assembly/machining site.

Bought-out Part Ref 11

Supplier X
Supplier Site Y Later
Other Case

New Supplier Z or
New Supplier Site Z

New Product / New

Part Reference

Plant 1

All criteria are taken New All criteria are taken

PSW/AFF PSW/AFF into account to
into account to
signed by signed by approve the PSW/AFF.
approve the PSW/AFF.
SQA of 1 SQA of 1

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 20
 Some particular cases

 Each Product-Process-Facility site change => new PSW and

new AFF

 Case of carry-over parts => new PSW and new AFF. The
assembly/usinability, logistic, capacity criteria are at least
reviewed. Additional validation tests can be necessary (in
compliance with the use conditions).

 If parts are manufactured with “low production” tools and all

PSW approval criteria are satisfied:
 the PSW can be approved.
 the set up of mass production tools shall be managed as a process
change and will trigger a new PSW.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 21
 Reminders
 The Supplier shall not launch any manufacturing site transfer
before the Supplier Manufacturing Approval.

 The manufacturing site, the process line, the process steps

used to implement PSW & AFF activities, shall be those
identified for mass production.

 Note : a line transfer inside a plant is a process change to be

submitted to Renault/Nissan.
Ligne X91

Ligne X74 Ligne X91

Eg. : Ligne X81 Ligne X81 = Transfer
Ligne X73 Ligne X73
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 22
 Reminder about Concessions
If the PSW is under Interim Approval :
A concession shall be established and validated
in order to allow product delivery and assembly on vehicle

 The concession is submitted by the Supplier to Renault core Team

members

 The dispensation describes clearly the concern, the batch quantity,

the duration, the corrective action plan, the end date.

 The concession must be validated by the relevant Renault services

(DIV, DIVD, DIM, Plant Quality, DLI…)

 As long as the concession is not closed, a copy is included in the

Conformity Reference File.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 23
 The PSW & AFF documents

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Part Submission Warrant (PSW) Format

The Supplier
signs the
document.
Renault SQA
signs for
approval.

Click the documents

attached to the PSW

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 25
 PSW example of List of attached documents

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 26
 Manufacturing Approval (AFF)

The Supplier
signs the
document.
Renault SQA
signs for
approval.

In Version 2.1

NO INTERIM
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 27
 Questions / Anwers

Do you have any question ?

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 28
CR RAPP** : how to manage the PSW/AFF Product Process
Progress Status Review

**CR RAPP= Compte-Rendu des Revues d’Avancement Produit-Process

= Product Process Progress Status Review

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Basics
The CR RAPP is a tool consistent with the PSW/AFF
Approval Procedure.
 Objective of the CR RAPP?
 To evaluate the POE Product-Process conformity
 To have Supplier’s commitment on the part conformity (PSW ) at the mass
production level (AFF).

 How to evaluate & demonstrate the Product Process conformity?

 Evaluation of ANPQP output documents submitted by the Supplier to Renault.
 Evaluation of Renault Input Data & Results delivered by Renault to the Supplier.
 Nota: some ANPQP deliverables are not in the CR RAPP because they don’t
contribute directly to the demonstration of the conformity.
 Example 1: the Change Request, because it’s a tool to manage the change.
 Example 2: The Process AMDEC/FMEA is not a criteria to ensure the part
conformity. It is a tool to build the Control Plan which is a PSW criteria.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 30
 Basics
 What is the CR RAPP content?
 Information relative to the part, the Supplier and the Project involved.
 PSW/AFF evaluation “key questions”
 Associated ANPQP Suppliers output documents and Renault Input Data & Results.
 Action plans
 Decisions taken as a conclusion of each Review.
 Concessions follow-up
 List of the Participants to the Review : GFE/GFS members (inc. Supplier) : GFE/GFS pilot,
the POE Animator (and if necessary the Supplier Process Pilot for high-risked parts), the
Buyer, the Plant SQA representative and the Supplier.

 Who signs the CR RAPP?

 GFE/GFS members (inc. Supplier)

 When to use it?

 In development phase, during the ANPQP Phase 4, for all Product / Process Reviews.
 In serial life, when it’s necessary to approve a new PSW/AFF.

 Where to find the CR RAPP?

 It is available in the AER (Renault Procedures Database) in English and in French :
http://notope01.renault.fr/AER/rpif00.nsf/URLReference/RPIFMETHQ20080007
 A guide to help you to fulfil the CR RAPP is integrated in the format.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 31
 To understand the format of the CR RAPP

Part-Supplier-Project Information

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 32
 To understand the format of the CR RAPP
ANPQP deliverables under Supplier’s responsibility

PSW
PSW Criteria

AFF AFF Criteria

List of ANPQP documents which contribute to each criteria

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 33
 To understand the format of the CR RAPP

Inputs & Results under Renault responsibility

PSW Criteria
PSW

AFF AFF Criteria

List of Renault Input Data (ID) which contribute to each criteria

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 34
 To understand the format of the CR RAPP
PSW

Synthesis of PSW Criteria Status

Automatic Status : Assembly/Machining

Authorization Decision

GFE/S decision : to allow or not the Supplier

to present the PSW for signature

Automatic Status for the PSW

AFF
Synthesis of AFF Criteria Status

GFE/S decision : to allow or not the Supplier

to present the AFF for signature

Automatic Status for the AFF

Renault and Supplier’s Signatures

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 35
 To manage the PSW/AFF convergence with the CR RAPP
Kick Off Review just after
AMSLot / AMIOD :
CR RAPP initialization
Information on Part, Project,
Milestones
Not applicable criteria
identification
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
P/P Progress Reviews : P/P Progress Review
Criteria status up dating with OK criterias
P/P Conformity When all criteria are OK, Renault
Progress Reviews GFE members authorize the Supplier
to present the PSW / the AFF.
Then, the PSW/AFF is approved
by the Plant SQA.
Criteria status
evolutions
36
 Questions / Answers

Do you have any question ?

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 37
 Conformity Reference File

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 POE Conformity Reference File Definition
The POE Conformity Reference File is the POE Product
and Process Conformity Reference which is essential for
SQA to :
monitor product conformity in accordance with the product
validated definition/specification, in serial life,
 maintain confidence that the supplier process is in
accordance with supplier commitment, in serial life.

The supplier commits himself to be compliant with all the

documents which constitute the Conformity Reference
File.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 39
 Principle

Documents used in POE conformity

Product/process status review reference file
All
PSW/AFF documents
and evidence documents sent
with PSW,and AFF, PSW /AFF
(ex : control monitoring plan, Approval
capacity submission warant…)

Other documents
(ex :Supplier master shedule, production
preparation plan, Supplier contact directory, …)
Only some
documents

SQA : check, then

transfer in storage
Working area – ex. : e-room
zone – ex. : I/…
In case of Product / Process change  To update the Conformity Reference File

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 40
 ANPQP & Renault Results > PSW/AFF > Reference File Content

Phase 2
- Result 1 ANPQP additional Results
- Result 2
Ex. : Supplier Contact Directory
-Result 3 …

PSW
Phase 3 - Result 2 Results links to the PSW
- Result 4 - Result 3
- Result 5 …
- Result 4
Results linked to the AFF
- Result 5
Phase 4 - Result 6

- Result 6
- Result 7
- Result 8 … AFF
-Result 7
-Result 8
tput
Supplier Ou + Results of the PSW Approved
Documents lier
utput Supp
uts & Supplier O
Renault Inp
Results Documents ult
uts & Rena
Renault Inp
Results

Results expected at each

Part Milestone are followed CR RAPP Conformity Reference File
in the IV IS (vehicle) /
Powertrain « Grille »
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 41
 Process start
 At each ANPQP phase, the Supplier will gather the documents which
constitute the POE Conformity Reference File (Renault and Supplier’s
documents).
 The SQA checks that the Conformity Reference File is complete and
consistent.
 The creation of a new Conformity Reference file starts at least at the « Off
tools confirmation» milestone which start the ANPQP phase 4.

 But only the SUPPLIER himself. is responsible for document creation,

update and sending.

 In new product cases some documents are already initialized in the

ANPQP phase 2.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 42
 Preparation (Phase 2)
 At the beginning of Phase 2 (Kick-Off Meeting)
Meeting between GFE Pilot, SQA, Purchaser, Supplier, POE
Assistant (+SPP if high risk part) :
 To confirm the language for the Input & Output Documents
 To define generic Part References ANPQP File (“démarches ANPQP”)
 To open the working area e-rooms (external if possible) ; one per Supplier
 To put in the e-rooms, for each the standard arborescence for each ANPQP
File ( « Ref Piece »)
 To fix the “Who Does What” in th GFE (including SPP, Quality Experts…)
 All Inputs & Outputs are shared inside the GFE (e-room)
 During the Phase 2
 To put the documents in the working area (e-room).
 The POE Animator or the GFE Pilot identifies clearly the VALIDATED
documents (OK).
Example : « CSCC – OK – 240208.xls »

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 43
 Progress (Phase 3)
 At the beginning of Phase 3 (Kick-Off Meeting)
Meeting between GFE Pilot, SQA, Purchaser, Supplier, POE
Assistant (+SPP if high risk part) :
 Reminder : All Inputs & Outputs are shared inside the GFE (e-room)
 To check generic Part References ANPQP File (“démarches ANPQP”)
 To check the e-room arborescence
 During the Phase 3 :
 To put the documents in the working area (e-room).
 The POE Animator or the GFE Pilot identifies clearly the VALIDATED
documents (OK).
Example : « AMDEC Process – OK – 241008.xls »
« CSCC – OK – 241008.xls »

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 44
 Finalization (Phase 4)
 At the beginning of 4 (Kick-Off Meeting)
Meeting between GFE Pilot, SQA, Purchaser, Supplier, POE
Assistant (+SPP if high risk part) :

 Reminder : All Inputs & Outputs are shared inside the GFE (e-room)
 Reminder : Conformity Reference File Rules + Communication Kit
 To check generic Part References ANPQP File (“démarches ANPQP”)
 To agree between Ingineering & SQA the generic Part References / piloted
references, in order to be clear for the PSW, the AFF, and the Conformity
Reference Files
 Before PSW
 The POE L’Animateur ou à défaut le Pilote GFE, et le SQF s’assurent que les
livrables sont archivés dans la zone de travail (e-room).
 The POE Animator or the GFE Pilot and the SQA check that all documents
are in the working area (e-room), and that the VALIDATED documents are
clearly identified (OK).

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 45
 Finalization (Phase 4)
 Once the PSW is approved (with or without reserves)
 To check that all documents needed for the Conformity Reference
File are OK, referenced, and present in the working are (e-room)
 Then the SQA transfers the documents in the storage are (ex. : I/…),
and checks that the list is complete

 Once the AFF is approved and until AFF + 3 months

 To check that all documents needed for the Conformity Reference
File are OK, referenced, and present in the working are (e-room)
 Then the SQA transfers the documents in the storage are (ex. : I/…),
and checks that the list is complete

The Supplier shall have all documents needed for the

Conformity Reference File (inc. Renault’s).

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 46
Conformity Reference File – Who Does What : key points

 The GFE Pilot is responsible for generic Part References ANPQP

Files (ANPQP files) creation ;
 The POE Animator creates the e-room and put the standard
arborescence for each ANPQP File ( « Ref Piece »)
 If the e-room is external, the POE Animator makes sure that the
Supplier can access to it
 If the e-room is external, the Supplier submit the Output documents in
the e-room
 If the e-room is internal, the POE Animator collects the documents
and put them in the e-room
 The GFE Pilot, the Purchaser, the SQA Representative are
responsible for Renault Inputs & Results validation, and for Supplier
output documents (+SPP if high risk part)
 The POE Animator ensures that each output validated document
(Renault’s & Supplier’s) is in the e-room and has a clear name
«ex. : CSCC-240508-OK.xls ».

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 47
 Conformity Reference File Content

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Format & Content

The Core Team identifies with the Supplier :

 The format (paper, e-room, CD, IS)
 The list of the requested documents

The major documents class are :

 Supplier Quality Commitment Document (F1, PSW, AFF, …)
 Product Definition and packaging document (drawings,
specification, DCL…)
 Conformity evidence documents (inspection report, test report,
appearance approval report, assembly approval…)
 Manufacturing process key point definition ( process flow chart,
control plan…)

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 49
 Conformity Reference File Document list…

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 50
 …Conformity Reference File Document list

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 51
 Renault Input & Results

The main class of documents are :

 Product compliance validation documents

 Concession documents if necessary
 Audit results documents
 Documents which sum up Renault acceptation/approval are also a part of
the Conformity Reference File.
 For example the last P/P status review report or computing document are
also a part of the file.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 52
 Renault Documents

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 53
 Questions / Anwers

Do you have any question ?

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 54
 Chapter 5
Focus on Phase 5

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Conformity Reference File updating
During Mass Production

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 POE Conformity Reference File updating principles

The POE Conformity Reference File is updated :

 by the supplier who sends it to the SQA of all the customer plants
concerned.

 for each modification accepted/approved by Renault of a document

included in the file.

 for each non-conformity.

 for each supplier improvement process.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 57
 POE Conformity Reference File updating principles

Modification case (Example of modification : product, process,

transfer/location change, control plan modification, control tools
modification, organization…)

The documents which shall be updated are defined case by case

according to the risk origin and level.

When a modification request is accepted by Renault, the list of document

which shall be updated is detailed on the modification request document.

The required documents shall be submitted at least for the PSW

presentation.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 58
 POE Conformity Reference File updating principles

Incomings quality action case

 The documents are updated at least for step 8 of the 8D
process for capitalize and standardize the corrective action
plan.

Supplier progress implementation

 The documents shall be updated to prove that the supplier
improves his process

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 59
 Process Overview
development : Serial :
Specification ……. ANPQP ph. 1 to 4 ANPQP ph 5
Incoming datas

Initial conformity
Renault Documents reference file
P/P
status
review

then Modification , 8D
Supplier Documents Supplier
PSW improvement
AFF

Serial Conformity Reference capture Part status Serial Conformity

File is used for analysis for other plants reference
/ other Projects File Nx
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 60
 Change Management

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Reminder

The Supplier shall inform Renault about every kind of potential

change relative to his commitments :

 Product,
 Process,
 Site transfer and resourcing,
 Control Plan,
 Gauges,
 Organization (Contact directory),
 … F F a n da
a P SW &A
s sh al l have u p d a t ing.
o di fi c a tio n r en c e File
All m
f o rm i t y Refe
Con
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 62
 General Rules for Dealing with Modifications

When the Supplier needs to commence the modification process,

he shall follow the main steps below :

1. Identify the risks and the impacts of the modification,

2. Identify the activities to undertake, and the attached output
documents (AMDEC, Control Plan, Validation Plan…),
3. Plan all activities (from the Renault Decision to the application date)
4. Identify cost implications (inc. short term corrective actions, F4
Sheet, …),

…

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 63
 General Rules for Dealing with Modifications
When the Supplier needs to commence the modification process,
he shall follow the main steps below :
5. Submit the ANPQP Change Request document to Renault, (risk
analysis and actions plans, Master Planning, F4 Sheet… attached)

6. Obtain Renault Decision,

7. Undertake all activities (inc. Drawings / Cada Data up dating),
8. Obtain the PSW & AFF Approvals by customer plants SQA,
9. Update the conformity Reference File,
10. Apply the modification at the expected date.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 64
 ANPQP Documents – Product Change Request or Process/Facility Site
Change Request

Modification described on :
-The ANPQP Change Request for the
technical implications,
-The F4 Sheet for cost implications,
- The document, signed by the
Purchaser, is sent back to the Supplier
for official Decision.

2 documents are available :

-Product Change Request
-Process/ Facility Site Change Request

The Supplier shall not carry out any

Facility Site Transfers between the
suppliers' initial "off-process" trials and
the AFF.
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 65
 Documentation relative to the change

Request for change Renault or Supplier Request

ANPQP Change Request 1

F4 Sheet : cost implications The Supplier

2
describes how to
manage the
Pré-Study change
Documentation

LUP 3 Generates a CO-MODIF Decision Sheet

COMODIF : Renault Decision

To realize the activities

Mise
Miseààjour
jour du
du
4 To submit ANPQP documents Mise
Miseà jour
à jourdu
du
Dossier
To de
update
Dossier de the
And the PSW / AFF Dossier
Dossier dede
Référence POE
Conformity
Référence POE
To apply the change Référence
Référence POE
ReferencePOEFile
5

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 66
 Summary
Outside All production Possible Low risk
perimeter modifications are part derogation Supplier
• Complex and high-risk process
Phases, derived
versions, new customer of a train associated modification modification
• Urgent QC modification
requirements and
decontenting with new
criteria
LUP SQF*
OK
NO
The back scheduling plan The reference schedule fits with the The back
fits with the milestones scheduling plan
for application at a fixed
date of specification and scheduling of
the train fits with the YES
date
milestones

PROJECT COMMITEE COMODIF

YES
TRAINS Train?
NO
Direct
WORKLOAD COMMITEE application

Internal link http://www.intra.renault.fr/projet/modifspartrain/

External link https://suppliers.renault.com/wps/portal/ logisitc>data>modification trains

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 67
 Managing the POE Change Process for IM (Powertrain/Engines)

Possible deviation Process

Mass production modification • Complex and high-risk modification
managed by co-Modif associated modification , managed
• Urgent QC modification by SQA

NO
LUP SQF*
OK

YES
The reference schedule fits with the date of The back scheduling plan fits
specification with the milestones

COMODIF

Application

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 68
 Transfers & Resourcing

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Transfer and resourcing

Main cases :

1. Site Transfer : existing part for which the functional drawing

and the definition are not modified, but the Supplier
manufacturing Site is different (same process, same Process
Flow Chart)

2. Resourcing : existing part for which the functional drawing and

the definition are not modified, but the Supplier is different
=> new product.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 70
 Reminder in case of a resourcing

 The ISO TS 16-949 certification made by an organism

recognised by the ATF (International Automotive Task Force)
is requested to the Supplier.

 If the Supplier is not in the Renault Panel, or the new site

not known, Renault (DQDA) can make an ASES evaluation.

 Based on the evaluation results, the Supplier will manage

the Rank-up actions.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 71
 Requirements in case of Site Transfer

In this context :
The list of the ANPQP requirements has to be made case by case depending
on the risk level and the « Metier » (speciality concerned) needs :

 The Renault Inputs and the expected results shall all be analysed.
 The phasing of the ANPQP activities shall be consistent with the
Projects requirements (e.g. : parts needed, in vehicle validations with
conforming parts, logistics timing plan, vehicles batch definition …).

In any case, Process/Site Transfer Change Note, a Control Plan, a PSW and
a AFF are mandatory.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 72
 Requirements in case of the resourcing
of a TIER N sub-component

When a TIER 1 Supplier is proposing the ressourcing of a

TIER N sub-component :

 He shall obtain the Renault Approval,

 Deploy all Quality Assurance activities necessary with his TIER N

Suppliers,

 Give a good visibility to the Core Team members on the planning, the
activities monitoring and progress.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 73
 Non-conforming Product Management

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Main rules of the non-conforming product management

The SQA representative is the main contact for non-

conforming product management.

He participates to the conformity convergence (8D process).

In case of non-conforming product detection in customer plant, the

Supplier shall use the 8D document.

The Supplier quality PPM will be declared once the PSW is approved
(interim or without reserve) (PPM Q9030A03 Procedure).

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 75
 Conclusion

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Quality Assurance Reminders

Quality assurance goal : to have confidence in obtaining quality

All expected output document shall be accepted/approved by Renault

 Documents are demonstration

 Documents demonstrate Quality and Time targets achievement

 Documents demonstrate Supplier commitments.

 Key documents are included in Conformity Reference File

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 77
 Conclusion
 The ANPQP Standard describes Suppliers Activities : the Supplier
shall manage the activities, obtain the results, complete & submit the
output documents.

 The ANPQP Standard is following the product/process development

logic and mass production life.

 The Core Team animates the ANPQP (planning, organization,

communication…),

 The core Team works with experts.

 The ANPQP converges to contractual Commitments (as PSW & AFF).

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 78
 Key points

The Supplier shall inform Renault for all kind of change

intent (product, process, manufacturing site transfer,
resourcing / Supply Chain modification).

The Supplier :
 Up dates the Conformity Reference File,
 Shall obtain the PSW & AFF documents approvals

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 79
 Product / Process Review Meeting Minutes
CR RAPP

The evaluation of PSW & AFF criteria:

 Is made during the Product / Process Review Meeting
 Is conclude with the Product / Process Review Meeting : CR RAPP
signed by all Core Team members.

The approved CR RAPP authorizes the Supplier to submit :

 the PSW and the attached documents for signature by SQF.
then
 the AFF and the attached documents for signature by SQF.

All demonstrating outputs documents, validated & OK, are attached to the PSW
and the AFF.

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 80
 SOS ANPQP

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 SOS ANPQP

Contacts : anpqp.maintenance@renault.com

Nom Direction Adresse e.mail

Marc Lusardi D.Q.D.A. marc.lusardi@renault.com

Jean-Luc Cavelier D.Q.D.F. jean-luc.cavelier@renault.com
Dominique Chatel-Souchon D.I.M. – D.C.T. dominique.chatel-souchon@renault.com
Gilles Mauny D.Q. D.A.P.P. gilles.mauny@renault.com
Pascale Valette D.Q.I.V. pascale.valette@renault.com
Patrick Guillou D.L. patrick.guillou@renault.com
Béatrice Mello D.Q. anpqp.maintenance@renault.com
Thierry Beaufour D.Q. anpqp.maintenance@renault.com
Jean-Roland Lelasseux D.Q. anpqp.maintenance@renault.com

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 82
 SOS ANPQP
ANPQP Version 2 - Web site :
•Supplier Portal : https://suppliers.renault.com/wps/portal/
> Quality > Understand Renault > ANPQP Version 2.1
•Direct link :
https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v21/V21VGB-MDW/EN/index.htm
http://extranet.intra.renault.fr/anpqp/v21/V21VGB-MDW/EN/index.htm

•AER : http://www.intra.renault.fr/aer, then search “ANPQP”

EDI Support : Homologation : deploiement.fournisseur@renault.com
Support: webmaster.webedi@renault.com
Supplier Quality Information : Renault Inputs, « Who Does What", FAQ, Conformity
Reference File, PSW & AFF Procedure …
To go in Supplier portal : https://suppliers.renault.com/wps/portal/
Quality > Understand Renault > Alliance New Product Quality Procedure
Modifications (Vehicle) :
•Internal link: www.intra.renault.fr/projet/modifspartrain/
•External link: https://suppliers.renault.com/wps/portal/
> Logistics > Consult data > Batched change schedules
DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 83
 Debriefing
Evaluation fill-in form

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF
 Questions, réponses, conclusion

DQ-DO-MQ-AQF 85