CENTRO ESPECIALIZADO DE

INGENIERIA Y TECNOLOGIA S.A.C.

MODULO III

ANALISIS Y DISEÑO DE
MURO DE CONTENCION
CON SAP2000

ING. JOSE ANTONIO BELITO MANCHA

 0.30 m to H/12

Minimum
batter
Slope
change
1:48 to reduce
concrete
H
½ D to D
H/8 to H/6

D
May be 0.5 to 0.7 H
s
loped

(
a
)

Figure 12-5 (a)Tentative dimensions for a gravity retaining wall; (b)

broken-back retaining wall.
Figure 12-7 Forces involved in the sliding stability of a retaining wall.
 β
β

δ = angle of wall friction Ws

v a
P = P sin β Wc
Wc Ph P=v P
=aPcos
a sin (90°-
(90°- ∝+∝ δ)
+ δ) Ph
= Pa cos β P
δ Pa

∝ a
a
∝ If -small ∝ β
δ 90 ∝
P

n
eglect

V=
Wc + Pv V = Wc + Ws + Pv

(a)
b)
Figure 12-9 Forces on a gravity wall (a) Coulomb analysis; (b) Rankine analysis
 𝐾 𝑎 ∗ 𝑆𝑐

𝐾 𝑃 ∗𝛾 ∗ 𝐻 𝑚

𝐾 𝑎 ∗𝛾 ∗ 𝐻 𝑚
 1.5 𝑇 / 𝑀 2
Z

Y
𝐾 𝑎 ∗𝛾 ∗ 𝐻 𝑚
5 X

X Ea=1.817ton/m2
0.4 2.00

𝐶 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒=10 𝑡𝑜𝑛/𝑚

 JOINT PATRONS

AX+BY+CZ+D
0.3 0.3 0.3
0.15
3.1
C(0)+D=1.20
D=1.20
CZ+D

C(3.1)+1.2=0.3 0.60 0.6

1.2 0.6
C=-0.29 0 1.2 1.2

0.3 0.15 C(3.1)+0.4=0.15

3.1 C=-0.0806

CZ+D

0.40
0.4 0.2 1.2 0.7 0.8
0 C(0)+D=0.40
D=0.40
2.4
 JOINT PATRONS
1.5 𝑇 / 𝑀 2 =0.333*1.5=0.4995
AX+BY+CZ+D EMPUJE SC
0.3
Z=3.1

CZ+D
EMPUJE ACTIVO
1.2
Z=0 𝐾 𝑎 ∗𝛾 ∗ 𝐻 𝑚 =¿=1.817 𝑡𝑜𝑛/ 𝑚 2 ¿
𝐸 𝑡=1.81+0.4995=2.3165 𝑡𝑜𝑛/ 𝑚 2
C(0)+D=2.3165
D=2.3165
𝐾 𝑝 ∗𝛾 ∗ 𝐻 𝑚=¿=0.8604 𝑡𝑜𝑛/ 𝑚 2 ¿
C(3.1)+2.3165=0.4995
C(0)+D=0.8604 C=-0.5861
D=0.8604
C(0.194)+0.8604=0.00
C=-4.4351