AKAKUS OIL OPERATIONS

OHSAS 18001 – Gap Analysis

Final report
HSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT HISTORY

Background History

Plan, Select Integration &

Identify & Assess Creation & First Review Development Review & Improvement
and define Implementation process

AOO HS MS
2005
2005

GAP Analysis
ERM We have reached the stage where a major INTEGRATION
“ STEP CHANGE “ into implementation and
integration is the high priority
HAZID by
2007
2007

ERM

Operations
HSE Working plan
100% HSE 2008
Team Development
HSMSM
Engineering
Level 2
With only nominal input
HSMSM
from PE/Exploration
2008

Documents GP
2008

ManagementLevel 2
and
Documents GP
Technical
Level 3 groups i.e.
Operations,
Level 3 CP,Engineering,Drilling,etc
WI,
Documents
RA

Management
HSMSM

HSE Working plan Level 2

2009 Documents GP
2009
2009

Level 3
Documents
Level 3
Documents in
progress Level 3
Documents
Approved

HSE Working plan

2010
2010

2010

Document created Document created

References Document not in
Approved and pending
ERM Document place to be
being Management
created
implemented approval

2
AOO ACTUAL SITUATION VS. OHSAS 18001 REQUIREMENTS

AOO ACTUAL SITUATION VS. OHSAS 18001 REQUIREMENTS

Finding overview:
1. Define and document job descriptions. The
key HSE roles for all positions (not just
Finding overview: HSE Dept.)
4.1. General 1. Review Company Management of Change 2. HSE
70 Critical
% positions inMedium
line departments
priority
requirements process to be identified and responsibilities
2. Define & Document Hazard Management defined. Appropriate training programmes
method for complex process (i.e. HAZOP) to be developed
3.
4.2 OH&S Policy Legal Requirements 3. Verify documentation requirements of all
90% Low priority
operational facilities and ensure provision
of up to date documents
OHSAS 18001 MAIN AREAS

4.3 Planning 25%

4.4 Implementation High priority

and operation
10%

4.5. Checking 30%

Finding overview:
4.6. Management
1. review ownership of the incident
Transfer 70 %
50% Medium priority
investigation process to the line
departments and support with training as
appropriate. AOO VS OHSAS 18001 COMPLETION

0% 50 % 100 %

AOO situation Total Completion

3
 Finding overview:
1. Carry out a layout adequacy review
AOO ACTUAL SITUATION VS. OHSAS 18001 REQUIREMENTS
2. (PCS) Access Permission Policy and
OverrideFinding
Managementoverview:
3. Inspection
1. Philosophy:
Hazard Management: the documented
4. Instruments Set Points
hazard Database arrangements are
management
Finding
5. overview:
Corrosion Management
appropriate for routine activity risk
1. Review existing Management
assessment butofnot
Change
for the risks
procedure to ensure that all changes
associated with complex (toprocess hazards.
processes, to the organisation, to HSE
Define and document the process risk
procedures, tomanagement
specifications, etc) are AOO
methodologies ACTUAL SITUATION VS. GAP ANALYSIS FOCUS AREAS
(HAZID,
captured and
OHSAS 18001FindingGAP analyzed
HAZOP, covering the key etc) to be applied
bow-tie analysis,
ANALYSIS
overview:
stages INITIATION, REVIEW, APPROVAL
Main Element toFocus
new facilities
areas and upgrades and to the
1. Technical
IMPLEMENTATION competence
AND FEEDBACK assurance process
assessment of existing facilities
2. HSE Critical positions training process
4.4 Implementation Process safety
and operation (OHSAS18001 4.4.6.)
10%

Competence of GAP ANALYSIS FOCUS AREAS

4.4 Implementation
and operation
personnel 30%
(OHSAS18001 4.4.2):
High priority
Management of
4.3 Planning change 10%
(OHSAS18001 4.3.1.)

4.3 Planning
Hazard management 40%
(OHSAS18001 4.3.1.)

Management
4.4 Implementation Medium priority
and operation
Commitment 70 %
50%
(OHSAS18001 4.4.1.)
AOO VS OHSAS 18001 COMPLETION

0% 50 % 100 %
AOO situation Total Completion

4
 PROPOSAL FOR AKAKUS ACTION PLAN (OVERVIEW)
INCLUDING SUPPORT
Year 1 HIGH PRIORITY
1. Review & Approve annual
OHS objectives and plans
(4.3)
2. Review internal
communications and identify
improvements (4.4)
See Notes 1 2 3 4
1. Implement a joint ER
(Ops,HSE, Const) drill &
Exercise program (4.4)
2. Establish AOO document
and records control system
(4.4)
3. Define and implement
Management of Change
company process (4.3)
1. Undertake a survey of
production facilities and
update operations records
(P&IDs, PFDs, etc) (4.3)
2. Assist AOO Operations on
implementation minimum
operational procedures (4.4)
6
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
STEERING GROUP
LINE SUPERVISION
Year 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY Year 3 LOW PRIORITY
1. Define resource needs, 1. Monitor and measure OHS
responsibilities, roles, performance (4.5)
accountabilities and 2. Begin a programme of
authorities (4.4) internal OHS audits (4.5)
2. Review OHS performance 3. Evaluate compliance with
measurement activities (4.5) legal requirements 4.3)
3. Begin annual OHS MS
Review (4.6)
5 8
1. Review AOO corrective 1. Embed operational control
action tracking system cycle arrangements in the
(4.5) organisation (4.4)
2. Define & implement hazard 2. Verify competence of OHS
management procedures critical role holders and
(4.3) provide training as required
3. Undertake HAZOP (4.3) (4.4)
HAZOP 3. Implement hazard controls
& bowtie from HAZOP (4.3)
worksho
p 7
NOTES OHSAS Certification
1. Participation in a production facilities workshop in Madrid
2. Visit to Block 16 in Ecuador (MoC Methodology)
3. Project management training in Madrid
4. HAZOP and bowtie training in Madrid
5. OHS MS workshop in Madrid
6. Support for HAZOP and Bowtie Workshop (Tripoli and site
level).
7. Emergency Response training at site supervision level
8. Crisis Management (Targeting senior management)
9. Pre-certification audit
10. Availability of further technical HSE engineer support 5
STEERING GROUP (OVERVIEW)

AOO OPERATIONS Inform

REPRESENTATIVE requirements
as per
working plan
AOO ENGINEERING
Inform REPRESENTATIVE
working
plan Inform
AOO HSE MS
progress DEVELOPMENT working
COORDINATOR plan
progress

AOO MANAGEMENT
AKAKUS OIL REPRESENTATIVE SITE
OPERATIONS SUPERVISON
Review
MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
Support to required
COMMITTEE AOO PE &
resources ELSHARARA
steering EXPLORATION
group REPRESENTATIVE ZAWIA

SECOND PARTY
TECHNICAL Provision of
REPRESENTATIVE key local
REMSA
information

6
ACTIVITY PLAN NARRATIVE SHEET (PROPOSAL
EXAMPLE)

OHSAS 18001 Certification project AKAKUS OIL OPERATIONS - STEERING GROUP

REV: ---------- ACTIVITY PLAN TASK

HIGH PRIORITY
DATE: -------- COMPANY MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROCESS
COMMENTS/
ASPECTS NARRATIVE
HYPERLINKS
The direct and underlying cause of many accidents and injuries is failure to
properly recognize and/or manage change. The purpose of this PLAN ACTIVITY
is to provide a process for AKAKUS OIL OPERATIONS to manage change to assure
that risk is not unknowingly incurred.

This PLAN ACTIVITY shall be used to manage permanent and temporary

REQUIREMENT /
changes of the following types:
DESCRIPTION • Physical changes (e.g., permanent or temporary additions, deletions,
replacements and modifications to structures and equipment)
• Procedural changes.
Involved parties shall follow the MOC Process and manage each change during its
execution, and provide the required documentation, communication and training
prior to Closure.

PRECEDING OHSAS 18001 GAP ANALYSIS

ACTIVITIES
STEERING GROUP PARTIES, NO EXTERNAL INVOLVEMENT IS REQUIRED
INPUTS LINE SUPERVISION (SITE LEVEL)

7
ACTIVITY PLAN NARRATIVE SHEET (PROPOSAL)

The Steering groups should work jointly with involved parties to define the necessary
TASKS task to be completed

Responsible Consulted Informed

RCI
(To be agreed by the Date - Signature Date - Signature Date - Signature
STEERING GROUP)
Name 1 Name 2 Name 3

An structured approach to communicate and manage Physical changes (e.g.,

DELIVERABLE permanent or temporary additions, deletions, replacements and modifications to
structures and equipment) or Procedural changes.
1. Existing AKAKUSNET intranet service helps to ensure information is available to
TOOLS the parties during the Management of change process
2. Document control group
Second party available documentation/systems in place
REFERENCES International and recognized standards

TARGET
Target date for completion should be determined by steering group, however it could be
COMPLETION subdivided on stages as per plan convenience
DATE
To be identified from previous or similar locations
EXAMPLES
SUCCESS FACTOR RISKS
SF / RISKS •Management Commitment •No availability of experience resources
•Continuous review •No previous experiences or lesson learn
available