MCA IV Semester Project II Review Presentation

Detection of fake online reviews using semi-supervised and supervised learning

By  

G.Manoj Kumar
 

(20BF1F0033)
 

 
Under the guidance of
 
P.LOKESH KUMAR REDDY
Assistant Professor
 

 
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER APPLICATION
 
SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 
Karakambadi Road, TIRUPATI – 517507
 2020– 2022 
 Contents
 ABSTRACT

 INTRODUCTION

 PROBLEM DEFINITION

 EXISTING SYSTEM

DISADVANTAGES OF EXISTING SYSTEM

 PROPOSED SYSTEM

ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED SYSTEM

 Contents

 SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS

 ALGORITHMS

 MODULES

 ARCHITECTURE

 UML DIAGRAMS

 TESTING STRATEGIES
 ABSTRACT

 
 

Online reviews have great impact on today’s business and commerce.

 

Decision making for purchase of online products mostly depends on reviews

given by the users. Hence, opportunistic individuals or groups try to
manipulate product reviews for their own interests. This Project introduces
some semi-supervised and supervised text mining models to detect fake
online reviews as well as compares the efficiency of both techniques on
dataset containing hotel reviews
 INTRODUCTION

 Technologies are swiftly evolving. Old innovations are being constantly substituted
with modern and emerging technologies.

 This emerging innovations allow individuals to carry out their work effectively. The
online marketplace is such a technical advancement.

 Through utilising online portals, can shop and make reservations. Before consuming
those goods or facilities, almost every one of us seeks out feedback.

 They also have a huge influence on advertisements and the marketing of goods and
services. Fake web reviews are becoming extremely relevant with the spread of the
online marketplace.

 For the marketing of their own goods, people may create fake reviews that damage the
real consumers.

 Researchers have been exploring several ways to recognise these bogus web reviews.
Some methods are focused on the quality of the article and some are based on the
actions of the consumer who publishes feedback.
 PROBLEM DEFINITION

This Project introduces some semi-supervised and supervised text mining models to
detect fake online reviews as well as compares the efficiency of both techniques on
dataset containing hotel reviews.
 EXISTING SYSTEM

 Content based methods focus on what is the content of the review. That is the
text of the review or what is told in it. Heydari et al. have attempted to detect
spam review by analyzing the linguistic features of the review.

 Ott used three techniques to perform classification. These three techniques are-
genre identification, detection of psycholinguistic deception and text
categorization.

 Behavior feature based study focuses on the reviewer that includes

characteristics of the person who is giving the review.

 Lim et al. addressed the problem of review spammer detection, or finding users
who are the source of spam reviews. People who post intentional fake reviews
have significantly different behavior than the normal user.
 DISADVANTAGES OF EXISTING SYSTEM

 In the existing work, the system uses only to semi-supervised learning.

 Only Text Classification as sentiment text and it never finds fake  

 PROPOSED SYSTEM

 In the proposed system, each review goes through tokenization process first. Then,
unnecessary words are removed and candidate feature words are generated.

 Each candidate feature words are checked against the dictionary and if its entry is
available in the dictionary then its frequency is counted and added to the column
in the feature vector that corresponds the numeric map of the word.

 Alongside with counting frequency, the length of the review is measured and
added to the feature vector.

 Finally, sentiment score which is available in the data set is added in the feature
vector. We have assigned negative sentiment as zero valued and positive sentiment
as some positive valued in the feature vector.
 ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED SYSTEM

 Detect Unseen Attacks

 Low False Positive rates
 Support Large Datasets
 Able to handle imbalanced Dataset
 HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS

 Processor- Intel (R) Core (TM) i3-4200U

 CPU - 1.6GHz

 RAM:4 GB

 Hard Disk: 500 GB.

 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS

 Operating System - Windows 10

 Server - XAMPP
 Front End - HTML, CSS, JS
 Back end - Python
 Data base - MYSQL
ALGORITHMS

The following the some algorithms used in this project:

 

1.  Naïve Bayes Classifier

MODULES

In this Proposed System, There are two modules. They are:

1. Service Provider

2. Remote User
MODULES

MODULES DESCRIPTION
 

 
 

In this Project, There are two modules :

 

Service provider

 
In this module, login , add movies, view uploaded movies, view positive, view
negative, view neutral, view sentients reviews, view rating results, dislike like results,
view remote users, view movie reviews, view trending movies, view movies
recommended, view fake reviews /ratings, logout

User

 
In the module, the user will register and then login and do such operations like view all
added movies, view all movies reviews, view trending movies, view your profile, view
all movies recommended, logout
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
UML DIAGRAMS

Class Diagram
 

Register
name
password
email
address
phone no.
image
Remote user
Service Provider
name
User name
password
Password
email
phone no.
Log in()
address
Add Movies()
image
View Uploaded movies()
View Postive / Negitave / netural Sentiment Reviews()
Register & login()
View Rating Results()
View all Added Movies()
Dislikes / Likes Results()
View all Movies Reviews()
View Remote Users()
View Trending movies()
View Movie Reviews()
View your profile()
View Trending Movies()
View all Movies Recommeded()
View Movie Recommeded()
Log out()
View Fake Reviews / Rating()
Log out()

Login
User name
password
UML DIAGRAMS

USE CASE DIAGRAM FOR REMOTE USER

 

Register & login

View all Added Movies

View all movies Reviews

Remote User

View Trending movies

View Your Profile

View all Movies Recommended

Log out
UML DIAGRAMS
USE CASE DIAGRAM FOR SERVICE PROVIDER
 

Login

Add Movies

Add Uploaded Movies

View Positive / Negative / Neutral

Sentiment reviews

View rating Results

Dislike / Like Results

Service Provider

View Remote Users

View Movie Reviews

View Trending Movies

View Movie Recommended

View Fake reviews / Rating

Log out
UML DIAGRAMS

Sequence diagram
 

Service provider Server Remote User

Login
Register & Login

1. Add movies

2. View uploaded movies

3. View postive / Negative/ netural sentiment reviews

4. View rating results

5. Dislike / Likes results

6. View remote users

7. View movie reviews

8. View tranding movies

9. View movies recommended

10. View fake reviews / rating

11. View all Added movies

12. View all movies reviews

UML DIAGRAMS

Collaboration diagram
 

Add Movies
View uploaded movies
View positive / Negitive / Netural
sentiment reviews
View rating results
Dislikes / Likes Results
View Remote Users
View Movies Reviews
View Trending Movies
View movies recommended
View Fake Reviews / Rating
1:
: Service : Remote
: Server
provider User
View all Added Movies
View all Movies Reviews 2:
View Trending movies
View your profile
View All Movies recommeded
UML DIAGRAMS

ACTIVITY diagram For Remote User

 

Register & Login

Invalid

Che
ck Valid

View all Added Movies

View all Movies Reviews

View Trending movies

View your profile

View all Movies recommeded

Log out
UML DIAGRAMS
Activity diagram For Service Provider
 

Login
Invalid

Che
ck Valid

Add Movies View Remote Users

View Uploaded Movies View Movie Reviews

View Positive / Negative / Neutral View Trending Movies

Sentiment Reviews

View rating Results View Movie Recommended

Dislike / Likes results View Fake Reviews / Rating

Log out
UML DIAGRAMS

Deployment diagram
 

admin
user

server
SYSTEM TESTING

The Common view of testing held by users is that it is preformed to improve that there are
no errors in a program. This is extremely difficult since designer cannot prove to be one hundred
percent accurate

It requires the focus on basic critical factors:

 Planning

 Project and process control

 Risk management

 Organization and professionalism Inspections

 Measurement tools
SYSTEM TESTING

 Level of Testing

The term end-to-end testing is also used in many organizations and tends to refer to a
combination of Systems Testing and Systems Integration Testing. Also, in some organizations the
term Systems Testing is used interchangeably with end-to-end testing.

 Test Plan

Before going for testing, first decide upon the type of testing to be carried out. The following
factors are taken into consideration:

To ensure whether that information properly flows into and out of program.

To find whether the local data structures maintaining their integrity during all steps in an
algorithm execution or not.
SYSTEM TESTING

To ensure that the module operate properly at boundaries established to limit or restrict
progressing.

To find out whether error-handling paths are working correctly or not. To find out
whether the values are correctly updated or not check for validation

Objectives of Testing
 

 Testing is done to ensure

 No bug occurrence in future usage of the Application.
 Quality Assurance standard is achieved.
 Discover symptoms caused by bugs and provide clear diagnosis so that bugs can be
easily prevented.
SYSTEM TESTING

Test Case Design Techniques

During testing the program to be tested is executed with a set of test cases and output
 

of the program for the test cases is evaluated to determine if the program is performing as
expected. To accomplish this objectives test case design techniques are used:

 Unit Testing.

 Integration Testing.

 User Acceptance Testing.

 Output Testing.

 Validation Testing.